On PR #421 CI did not work and it was force merged. Thus we managed to have failing CI on master.. :( sorry
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/425
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
The User print will be used in future for list of users for admin
Co-authored-by: Matti R <matti@mdranta.net>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/426
Reviewed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: Alexey ใerentyev <axifive@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
```
$ tea issue 230
#230 issue/pull details: show reactions (open)
@6543 created 2020-10-22 16:39
since reactions are utf8 now and most terminals too, we can display them nicely :)
https://gitea.com/api/v1/repos/gitea/tea/issues/230/reactions
--------
1x ๐ | 1x ๐ | 1x | 1x ๐ | 1x ๐ | 1x ๐ | 1x ๐ | 1x โค๏ธ
```
caveats:
- reactions are not returned as UTF8 (as was claimed in #230), so they need to be parsed. the library I use doesn't (and can't โ ) support all reactions available in gitea
- currently only for issues, as reactions for comments mean an additional API request for each comment..
fixes #230
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/421
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
This PR adds the `--fields` flag to `tea pr ls` (#342), and exposes more fields specific to the `PullRequest` type:
```
--fields value, -f value Comma-separated list of fields to print.
Available values:
index,state,author,author-id,url,title,body,mergeable,base,base-commit,head,diff,patch,created,updated,deadline,assignees,milestone,labels,comments
(default: "index,title,state,author,milestone,updated,labels")
```
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <61625851+justusbunsi@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/415
Reviewed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.io>
- `make build` + `make install` now support the `STATIC=true` parameter, creating statically linked builds that are also position independent executables
- this requires CGO and a static libc on the build system
- `CGO_ENABLED=0` is set for all make build targets, unless `STATIC=true` is set
- Debug symbols are stripped (`-s -w`) for all make build targets
- Release binaries are built statically by gox (no PIE), as before.
I also took the liberty to declutter the makefile from unused & duplicated variables.
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/349
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
I added this check in #327, but it wasn't needed at all
as the error case it intended to catch where already handled by checking if the path exists.
fixes #378
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/398
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
this is a partial fix to #378, making the command available outside of a local repo.
new behaviour:
- when run interactively without local repo context, the head repo prompt is not pre-populated
- when run with flags without local repo context, it will complain unless `--head` is specified
refactor:
- pass TeaContext down to task.CreatePull
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/393
Reviewed-by: Alexey ใerentyev <axifive@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
fixes #380
note: It seems like it was expected that `SSHHost` only contains the host portion. So this may be breaking (although I don't believe many people used the feature like that with a custom ssh port). I can't think of a good reason to *not* specify the port in that field, including the port seems more intuitive
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/391
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
- [x] enhance notification listing
- add `--states` and `--type` filters
- toggle per-user or per-repo listing via `--mine` flag
- print more fields
- [x] add subcommands to mark notifications as read, unread, pinned, unpinned. operates on
- all notifications matching the `--state` and `--mine` filter flags, or
- a notification specified by ID.
- [ ] ~~add a `--fields` flag for notifications listing.~~ *not in this PR*
- [ ] ~~interactive mode~~ *not in this PR*. this would go well together with #324
fixes #243, fixes #155
based on initial work in #283 and #386, but opening a new PR for @6543 to review as I changed quite a lot
---
### โ ๏ธ breaking โ ๏ธ
- `tea notifications --all` has moved to `tea notifications --mine`
- `tea notifications` now only works with the context of a remote repo.
To run this outside of a local git dir, run either `tea n --mine` or `tea n --repo <my/repo>`
---
Co-authored-by: Karl Heinz Marbaise <kama@soebes.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/389
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: Alexey ใerentyev <axifive@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
On some OSs ([i.e. macOS](https://github.com/adrg/xdg#xdg-base-directory)), XDG directories contain spaces, so we need to wrap the resulting path used in autocomplete sourcing commands in quotation marks.
Co-authored-by: Matthew Daley <mattd@bugfuzz.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/383
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reviewed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: nukuta <nukuta@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: nukuta <nukuta@noreply.gitea.io>
Currently, `tea` only supports the $EDITOR env var to open the user's preferred editor (used for reviewing pull requests).
Standard \*nix practice is, however, to check for $VISUAL first and only then use $EDITOR as fallback.
This is also done by Git itself, see man git-var(1).
(Actually, the order there is $GIT_EDITOR > core.editor > $VISUAL > $EDITOR > vi)
Co-authored-by: plgruener <pl.gruener@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/356
Reviewed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: plgruener <plgruener@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: plgruener <plgruener@noreply.gitea.io>
as title, fixes #361
Handling of fish shell is different in urfave/cli; urfave/cli provides a generator for the shell script needed (probably because the fish `completion` syntax isn't flexible enough to let the application handle the completion at runtime? idk)
This means that the fish completion can become out of sync with the tea binary.
If we want to account for that, on each application run we need to
- check if `~/.config/fish/conf.d/tea_completion.fish` exists; if so
- check if the tea version that wrote it is the currently running version
- if not, rewrite the file.
Not sure this is worth the complexity & cost
It generates a completion that also suggests file names, which looks kinda messy: Didn't find a way around this, but [there may be a way](5bb54ace57/fish.go (L160-L180))
![grafik](/attachments/b08541c9-0f37-4c70-a2e3-1ec9da15a430)
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/364
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
The `tea orgs` command is an alias to `tea orgs list`, and as such should have the same flags.
fixes #354
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/357
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
..by explicitly fetching `refs/pulls/:idx/head` from the base repo.
Sorry, I mixed this with a split-up of `PullCheckout()`. I can try to separate that, if preferred
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/341
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Not sure if this is the best way, but it's the simplest way to fix #333.
Everything else is overly complex due to a chicken-egg problem:
Knowing which remote / branch to push involves requires prompting the user,
which requires to have a upstream branch pushed to detect default values.
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/334
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Reviewed-by: khmarbaise <khmarbaise@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
This enables to run commands that need minimal context (i.e. `tea n --all`) to run anywhere.
fixes #329
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/336
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
This avoids creation of local branches, to avoid cluttering the local repo:
- if the commit already exists on the tip of a local branch, check that one out
- otherwise check out the remote tracking branch (`refs/remotes/<remote>/<head>`), and suggest what to do if you want to make changes.
I'm not certain this behaviour is actually better, I suggest leaving this open for a while for people to try out the new behaviour:
```
tea pr checkout 314
make install
```
fixes #293
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/314
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-committed-by: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
better docs
add --mine flag
hm, is there a better name? ๐ค
do time filtering serverside
make printed fields dynamic
add --fields to tea times ls
code review
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/319
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-Committed-By: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
show comments of PR
TODO: there needs to be a way to force running non-interactively
add `tea comment` to post a comment
add --comments flag, prompt only if necessary
don't prompt if --comments is provided, or output is piped
show comments for issues, add --comments flag
tea comment: print resulting comment
Merge branch 'master' into issue-172-comments
remove debug print statement
unrelated, but better than opening another PR for this ;)
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into issue-172-comments
ret err
fix lint
Co-authored-by: Norwin Roosen <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/tea/pulls/313
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-Authored-By: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>
Co-Committed-By: Norwin <noerw@noreply.gitea.io>