1
0
mirror of https://git.openwrt.org/openwrt/openwrt.git synced 2024-10-22 07:31:37 +02:00
openwrt/target/linux/generic/pending-4.19/411-mtd-partial_eraseblock_write.patch
Hauke Mehrtens 9261e7447e kernel: Make the patches apply on top of 4.19
This makes the patches which were just copied in the previous commit
apply on top of kernel 4.19.

The patches in the backports-4.19 folder were checked if they are really
in kernel 4.19 based on the title and only removed if they were found in
the upstream kernel.

The following additional patches form the pending folder went into
upstream Linux 4.19:
pending-4.19/171-usb-dwc2-Fix-inefficient-copy-of-unaligned-buffers.patch
pending-4.19/190-2-5-e1000e-Fix-wrong-comment-related-to-link-detection.patch
pending-4.19/478-mtd-spi-nor-Add-support-for-XM25QH64A-and-XM25QH128A.patch
pending-4.19/479-mtd-spi-nor-add-eon-en25qh32.patch
pending-4.19/950-tty-serial-exar-generalize-rs485-setup.patch
pending-4.19/340-MIPS-mm-remove-mips_dma_mapping_error.patch

Bigger changes were introduced to the m25p80 spi nor driver, as far as I
saw it in the new code, it now has the functionality provided in this
patch:
pending-4.19/450-mtd-m25p80-allow-fallback-from-spi_flash_read-to-reg.patch

Part of this patch went upstream independent of OpenWrt:
hack-4.19/220-gc_sections.patch
This patch was reworked to match the changes done upstream.

The MIPS DMA API changed a lot, this patch was rewritten to match the
new DMA handling:
pending-4.19/341-MIPS-mm-remove-no-op-dma_map_ops-where-possible.patch

I did bigger manual changes to the following patches and I am not 100% sure if they are all correct:
pending-4.19/0931-w1-gpio-fix-problem-with-platfom-data-in-w1-gpio.patch
pending-4.19/411-mtd-partial_eraseblock_write.patch
pending-4.19/600-netfilter_conntrack_flush.patch
pending-4.19/611-netfilter_match_bypass_default_table.patch
pending-4.19/670-ipv6-allow-rejecting-with-source-address-failed-policy.patch
hack-4.19/211-host_tools_portability.patch
hack-4.19/221-module_exports.patch
hack-4.19/321-powerpc_crtsavres_prereq.patch
hack-4.19/902-debloat_proc.patch

This is based on patchset from Marko Ratkaj <marko.ratkaj@sartura.hr>

Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
2018-12-15 14:28:48 +01:00

133 lines
3.9 KiB
Diff

From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: mtd: implement write support for partitions covering only a part of an eraseblock (buffer data that would otherwise be erased)
lede-commit: 87a8e8ac1067f58ba831c4aae443f3655c31cd80
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
---
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/linux/mtd/mtd.h | 4 +++
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
#include "mtdcore.h"
#include "mtdsplit/mtdsplit.h"
+#define MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL 0x8000 /* partition only covers parts of an erase block */
+
/* Our partition linked list */
static LIST_HEAD(mtd_partitions);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(mtd_partitions_mutex);
@@ -221,6 +223,53 @@ static int part_erase(struct mtd_info *m
{
struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
int ret;
+ size_t wrlen = 0;
+ u8 *erase_buf = NULL;
+ u32 erase_buf_ofs = 0;
+ bool partial_start = false;
+
+ if (mtd->flags & MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL) {
+ size_t readlen = 0;
+ u64 mtd_ofs;
+
+ erase_buf = kmalloc(part->parent->erasesize, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!erase_buf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ mtd_ofs = part->offset + instr->addr;
+ erase_buf_ofs = do_div(mtd_ofs, part->parent->erasesize);
+
+ if (erase_buf_ofs > 0) {
+ instr->addr -= erase_buf_ofs;
+ ret = mtd_read(part->parent,
+ instr->addr + part->offset,
+ part->parent->erasesize,
+ &readlen, erase_buf);
+
+ instr->len += erase_buf_ofs;
+ partial_start = true;
+ } else {
+ mtd_ofs = part->offset + part->mtd.size;
+ erase_buf_ofs = part->parent->erasesize -
+ do_div(mtd_ofs, part->parent->erasesize);
+
+ if (erase_buf_ofs > 0) {
+ instr->len += erase_buf_ofs;
+ ret = mtd_read(part->parent,
+ part->offset + instr->addr +
+ instr->len - part->parent->erasesize,
+ part->parent->erasesize, &readlen,
+ erase_buf);
+ } else {
+ ret = 0;
+ }
+ }
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ kfree(erase_buf);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ }
instr->addr += part->offset;
ret = part->parent->_erase(part->parent, instr);
@@ -228,6 +277,24 @@ static int part_erase(struct mtd_info *m
instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
instr->addr -= part->offset;
+ if (mtd->flags & MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL) {
+ if (partial_start) {
+ part->parent->_write(part->parent,
+ instr->addr, erase_buf_ofs,
+ &wrlen, erase_buf);
+ instr->addr += erase_buf_ofs;
+ } else {
+ instr->len -= erase_buf_ofs;
+ part->parent->_write(part->parent,
+ instr->addr + instr->len,
+ erase_buf_ofs, &wrlen,
+ erase_buf +
+ part->parent->erasesize -
+ erase_buf_ofs);
+ }
+ kfree(erase_buf);
+ }
+
return ret;
}
@@ -536,19 +603,22 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partiti
remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
- /* FIXME: Let it be writable if it is on a boundary of
- * _minor_ erase size though */
- slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
- printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't start on an erase/write block boundary -- force read-only\n",
- part->name);
+ slave->mtd.flags |= MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL;
+ if (((u32)slave->mtd.size) > parent->erasesize)
+ slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
+ else
+ slave->mtd.erasesize = slave->mtd.size;
}
- tmp = part_absolute_offset(parent) + slave->mtd.size;
+ tmp = part_absolute_offset(parent) + slave->offset + slave->mtd.size;
remainder = do_div(tmp, wr_alignment);
if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) && remainder) {
- slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
- printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't end on an erase/write block -- force read-only\n",
- part->name);
+ slave->mtd.flags |= MTD_ERASE_PARTIAL;
+
+ if ((u32)slave->mtd.size > parent->erasesize)
+ slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
+ else
+ slave->mtd.erasesize = slave->mtd.size;
}
mtd_set_ooblayout(&slave->mtd, &part_ooblayout_ops);