* clean: remove last mentions to rpmbuild
Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@gmail.com>
* fix: goproxy
Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@gmail.com>
* fix: properly add the PostRemove script, not the PostInstall script
* feat: provide more field support for rpms
New RPM fields
---
* Description
* OS <= info.Platform
* Licence
* URL <= info.Homepage
* Vendor
* Packager <= info.Maintainer
* Provides
* Require <= info.Depends
* Obsolete <= info.Replaces
* Suggests
* Conflicts
Fixes
---
* RPM Compression types are supported again
* RPM Config files are supported again
* `rpmpack` will support all the rpm file types, so we could extend this more latter
* chore: disable wsl (a new linter in 1.20.x got golangci-lint) until we decide to enable it
* chore: address PR comments
* fix: rules tests, overridables
Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@gmail.com>
* doc: gogoc
Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@gmail.com>
* fix: rpm template
Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@gmail.com>
* fix: rpm template
Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@gmail.com>
* fix: improve rpm release config
Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@gmail.com>
* fix: template
Signed-off-by: Carlos Alexandro Becker <caarlos0@gmail.com>
* fix: Define sourcedir and rpmfilename macros for rpmbuild
Our build system has a complex rmpbuld environment set up where
macros don't match with the defaults that nfpm exepcts. This
change will enforce those defaults which makes nfpm less
dependant on the build environment.
* feat: Add Group and Prefix tags for RPMs
These tags are only implemented for RPMs because there is
no good parallel to draw to deb tags.
See #57
* fix: moved rpm only tags into their own block
* test: added test for RPM block
* fix: fixed rpm only tags test
* test: Testing spec file for RPM specific tags
See: #57
* add support for build rpm packages for aarch64
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hartmann <chris@lollyrock.com>
* add unit test to verify the manipulation of the arch field
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hartmann <chris@lollyrock.com>
* add acceptance test for arm64 builds
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hartmann <chris@lollyrock.com>
* use newer travis ubuntu distro
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hartmann <chris@lollyrock.com>
* enable binfmt in docker
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hartmann <chris@lollyrock.com>
* feat: Add optional packager tag to rpm spec
Using the `Maintainer` tag from deb as the `Packager` tag for rpm
See #57
* feat: Optional epoch field added to both rpm and dep packages
See #57
* test: Adding test for deb epoch field
Adding a unit test for the epoch field and fixing the implementation
of version number with epoch for deb packager.
See #57
The Debian policy[1] declares the following control file fields as
required for binary packages:
* Package
* Version
* Section
* Priority
* Architecture
* Maintainer
* Description
All other fields are optional. A few programs handling .deb packages
emit warnings when optional fields exist without a value.
With this change the template generating the control file is updated to
omit empty values. Comments are added to denote mandatory fields.
A newly added test verifies the generated control file.
[1]
<https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#
binary-package-control-files-debian-control>
Signed-off-by: Michael Hanselmann <public@hansmi.ch>
