The latest update to avoid misspelled revs interfered when we
were not interested in parsing non flags or arguments not meant
for rev-list. This makes these two forms work again:
git whatchanged -- git-fetch-script
We could enable "!def" in the part this change touches to make
the above work without '--', but then it would cause misspelled
v2.6.14..v2.6.16 to be given to diff-tree and defeats the whole
point of the previous fix.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Earier specifying an abbreviation shorter than minimum fell back
to full 40 letters, which was nonsense. Make it to fall back to
the minimum number (currently 4).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When displaying Merge: lines, we used to take the real commit
parents from the commit objects. Use the parsed parents from
the commit object instead, so that we honor fake parent
information from info/grafts.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The usage of rev-parse to serve as a flag/option parser
for git-whatchanged and other commands have serious limitation
that the flags cannot be something that is supported by
rev-parse itself, and it cannot worked around easily. Since
this is rarely used "poor-man's describe", rename the option for
now as an easier workaround.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We do not allow abbreviation shorter than 4 letters in other
parts of the system so do not attempt to generate such.
Noticed by Uwe Zeisberger.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The new option behaves just like --verify, but outputs an
abbreviated object name that is unique within the repository.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The minimum length of abbreviated object name was hardcoded in
different places to be 4, risking inconsistencies in the future.
Also there were three different "default abbreviation
precision". Use two C preprocessor symbols to clean up this
mess.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The one thing I've considered doing (I really should) is to add a "stop
when you don't find the file" option to "git-rev-list". This patch does
some of the work towards that: it removes the "parent" thing when the
file disappears, so a "git annotate" could do do something like
git-rev-list --remove-empty --parents HEAD -- "$filename"
and it would get a good graph that stops when the filename disappears
(it's not perfect though: it won't remove all the unintersting commits).
It also simplifies the logic of finding tree differences a bit, at the
cost of making it a tad less efficient.
The old logic was two-phase: it would first simplify _only_ merges tree as
it traversed the tree, and then simplify the linear parts of the remainder
independently. That was pretty optimal from an efficiency standpoint
because it avoids doing any comparisons that we can see are unnecessary,
but it made it much harder to understand than it really needed to be.
The new logic is a lot more straightforward, and compares the trees as it
traverses the graph (ie everything is a single phase). That makes it much
easier to stop graph traversal at any point where a file disappears.
As an example, let's say that you have a git repository that has had a
file called "A" some time in the past. That file gets renamed to B, and
then gets renamed back again to A. The old "git-rev-list" would show two
commits: the commit that renames B to A (because it changes A) _and_ as
its parent the commit that renames A to B (because it changes A).
With the new --remove-empty flag, git-rev-list will show just the commit
that renames B to A as the "root" commit, and stop traversal there
(because that's what you want for "annotate" - you want to stop there, and
for every "root" commit you then separately see if it really is a new
file, or if the paths history disappeared because it was renamed from some
other file).
With this patch, you should be able to basically do a "poor mans 'git
annotate'" with a fairly simple loop:
push("HEAD", "$filename")
while (revision,filename = pop()) {
for each i in $(git-rev-list --parents --remove-empty $revision -- "$filename")
pseudo-parents($i) = git-rev-list parents for that line
if (pseudo-parents($i) is non-empty) {
show diff of $i against pseudo-parents
continue
}
/* See if the _real_ parents of $i had a rename */
parent($i) = real-parent($i)
if (find-rename in $parent($i)->$i)
push $parent($i), "old-name"
}
which should be doable in perl or something (doing stacks in shell is just
too painful to be worth it, so I'm not going to do this).
Anybody want to try?
Linus
This ports the "combined diff" to diff-files so that differences
to the working tree files since stage 2 and stage 3 are shown
the same way as combined diff output from diff-tree for the
merge commit would be shown if the current working tree files
are committed.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It considered an otherwise unchanged line that had line removals
in front of it an interesting line, which caused hunks to have
one extra the trailing context line.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Earlier round showed the commit log header and "diff --combined"
header even for paths that had no interesting hunk under --cc
flag. Move the header display logic around to squelch them.
With this, a merge that does not have any interesting merges
will not be shown with --cc option, unless -m is used at the
same time.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Santi Bejar points out that a hunk that changes from all the
same common parents except one is uninteresting. The earlier
round marked changes from only one parent uninteresting, but
this also marks hunks that have the same change from all but one
parent uninteresting, which is a natural extension of the
original idea to Octopus merges.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Remove extra whitespace between the change indicators and the
body text. That is more in line with the uncombined unified
diff output (pointed out by Santi Bejar).
When showing --cc, say so instead of saying just --combined.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
... and use the established pattern of tail initialized to point
at the head pointer for an empty list, and updated to point at
the next pointer field of the item at the tail when appending.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Building on the previous '-c' (combined) option, '--cc' option
squelches the output further by omitting hunks that consist of
difference with solely one parent.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
A new option '-c' to diff-tree changes the way a merge commit is
displayed when generating a patch output. It shows a "combined
diff" (hence the option letter 'c'), which looks like this:
$ git-diff-tree --pretty -c -p fec9ebf1 | head -n 18
diff-tree fec9ebf... (from parents)
Merge: 0620db3... 8a263ae...
Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sun Jan 15 22:25:35 2006 -0800
Merge fixes up to GIT 1.1.3
diff --combined describe.c
@@@ +98,7 @@@
return (a_date > b_date) ? -1 : (a_date == b_date) ? 0 : 1;
}
- static void describe(char *arg)
- static void describe(struct commit *cmit, int last_one)
++ static void describe(char *arg, int last_one)
{
+ unsigned char sha1[20];
+ struct commit *cmit;
There are a few things to note about this feature:
- The '-c' option implies '-p'. It also implies '-m' halfway
in the sense that "interesting" merges are shown, but not all
merges.
- When a blob matches one of the parents, we do not show a diff
for that path at all. For a merge commit, this option shows
paths with real file-level merge (aka "interesting things").
- As a concequence of the above, an "uninteresting" merge is
not shown at all. You can use '-m' in addition to '-c' to
show the commit log for such a merge, but there will be no
combined diff output.
- Unlike "gitk", the output is monochrome.
A '-' character in the nth column means the line is from the nth
parent and does not appear in the merge result (i.e. removed
from that parent's version).
A '+' character in the nth column means the line appears in the
merge result, and the nth parent does not have that line
(i.e. added by the merge itself or inherited from another
parent).
The above example output shows that the function signature was
changed from either parents (hence two "-" lines and a "++"
line), and "unsigned char sha1[20]", prefixed by a " +", was
inherited from the first parent.
The code as sent to the list was buggy in few corner cases,
which I have fixed since then.
It does not bother to keep track of and show the line numbers
from parent commits, which it probably should.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The files with conflicts need to be hand resolved, and it is a
good discipline for the committer to explain which branch was
taken and why. Pre-fill the merge message template with the
list of conflicted paths to encourage it.
This is from Linus.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If the index records an insanely long symbolic link, copying
into the temporary would overflow the buffer (noticed by Mark
Wooding).
Because read_sha1_file() terminates the returned buffer with NUL
since late May 2005, there is no reason to copy it anymore.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Needs iconv and third party lib/headers are inside /usr/local
Signed-off-by: Alecs King <alecsk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Commit 5c7d3c95 broke that by making the git-describe command part of
a pipe.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Zeisberger <zeisberg@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Johannes noticed the recent addition of this new flag
inadvertently took over existing --update-head-ok (-u). Require
longer abbreviation to this new option which would be needed in
a rare setup.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes read_tree_recursive and read_tree take a struct tree
instead of a buffer. It also move the declaration of read_tree into
tree.h (where struct tree is defined), and updates ls-tree and
diff-index (the only places that presently use read_tree*()) to use
the new versions.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Alas, not all shells named sh are capable enough to run
GIT-VERSION-GEN.
Signed-off-by: Jason Riedy <ejr@cs.berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In the last round of bug fixes the signed-off-by line was still be
generated but it was not including a signed-off-by line :(
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If you pass it a filename without the "--" marker to separate it from
revision information and flags, we now require that the file in question
actually exists. This makes mis-typed revision information not be silently
just considered a strange filename.
With the "--" marker, you can continue to pass in filenames that do not
actually exists - useful for querying what happened to a file that you
no longer have in the repository.
[ All scripts should use the "--" format regardless, to make things
unambiguous. So this change should not affect any existing tools ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
remove environment variables relating to the current repository
before execing the 'remote' half of a local push or pull operation
[jc: the original from Matt spelled out the environment variable
names, which I changed to the preprocessor symbols defined in
cache.h. Also it missed GRAFT_ENVIRONMENT.]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-peek-remote needs to handle a -u|--upload-pack parameter just like
git-fetch (and git-fetch has to pass it on to git-peek-remote).
(This is actually a follow-up to my previous git-fetch patch.)
Signed-off-by: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@heater.watson.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Without this, there is no way to specify a remote executable when
invoking git-pull/git-fetch as there is for git-clone.
[jc: I have a mild suspicion that this is a broken environment (aka
sysadmin disservice). It may be legal to configure your sshd to
spawn named program without involving shell at all, and if your
sysadmin does so and you have your git programs under your home
directory, you would need something like this, but then I suspect
you would need such workaround everywhere, not just git. But we
have these options we can use to work around the issue, so there
is no strong reason not to reject this patch, either. ]
Signed-off-by: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@watson.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
asciidoc 7.0.4 and newer considers such includes from parent directory
unsafe.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Instead of showing all the history since the beginning of time
leading to the the branch head, show only the changes this new
branch brings to the world.
This originally came from Linus and tested by Andreas Ericsson.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is the update hook we use in all our git-repos.
It has some improvements over the original version, namely:
* Don't send every commit since dawn of time when adding a new tag.
* When updating an annotated tag, just send the diffs since the last tag.
* Add diffstat output for 'normal' commits (top) and annotated tags (bottom).
* Block un-annotated tags in shared repos.
I'm a bit uncertain about that last one, but it demonstrates how to
disallow updates of a ref which we use, so I kept it.
Note that git-describe is needed for the "changes since last annotated tag"
thing to work.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We forgot to update the primary link from git.html leading to
the tutorial, and also forgot to build and install the renamed
core-tutorial document.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It is a common mistake to leave an unsed `origin` branch behind
if a shared public repository was created by first cloning from
somewhere else. Subsequent `git push` into it with the default
"push all the matching ref" would push the `origin` branch from
the developer repository uselessly.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The current Documentation/tutorial.txt concentrates on the lower-level
git interfaces. So it's useful to people developing alternative
porcelains, to advanced users, etc., but not so much to beginning users.
I think it makes sense for the main tutorial to address those
beginnning users, so with this patch I'm proposing that we move
Documentation/tutorial.txt to Documentation/core-tutorial.txt and
replace it by a new tutorial.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
