In 66713e84e7 (tests: prepare aligned mentions of the default branch
name, 2020-10-23), we started that transition, trying to prepare for a
time when `git init` would use that name for the initial branch.
Even if that time has not arrived, we can complete the transition by
making the test script independent of the default branch name. This also
allows us to drop the `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` prereq from one test
case.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 66713e84e7 (tests: prepare aligned mentions of the default branch
name, 2020-10-23), we started that transition, trying to prepare for a
time when `git init` would use that name for the initial branch.
Even if that time has not arrived, we can complete the transition by
making the test script independent of the default branch name. This also
allows us to drop the `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` prereq from one test
case.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 56300ff356 (t3200: prepare for `main` being shorter than `master`,
2020-10-23) and in 66713e84e7 (tests: prepare aligned mentions of the
default branch name, 2020-10-23), we started to prepare t3200 for a new
world where `git init` uses the branch name `main` for the initial
branch.
We do not even have to wait for that new world: we can easily ensure
that that branch name is used, independent of the exact name `git init`
will give the initial branch, so let's do that.
This also lets us remove the `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` prereq from three
test cases in that script.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 3224b0f0bb (t1400: prepare for `main` being default branch name,
2020-10-23), we prepared t1400 for a time when the default initial
branch name would be `main`.
However, there is no need to wait that long: let's adjust the test
script to stop relying on a specific initial branch name by setting it
explicitly. This allows us to drop the `PREPARE_FOR_MAIN_BRANCH` prereq
from two test cases.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Just like "git diff -w --exit-code" should exit with 0 when ignoring
whitespace differences results in no changes shown, if ignoring
certain changes with "git diff -I<pattern> --exit-code" result in an
empty patch, we should exit with 0.
The test suite did not cover the interaction between "--exit-code"
and "-w"; add one while adding a new test for "--exit-code" + "-I".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
test_perf() runs each test in its own subshell which makes it difficult
to persist variables between tests. test_export() addresses this
shortcoming by grabbing the values of specified variables after a test
runs but before the subshell exits, and writes those values to a file
which is loaded into the environment of subsequent tests.
To grab the values to be persisted, test_export() pipes the output of
the shell's builtin `set` command through `sed` which plucks them out
using a regular expression along the lines of `s/^(var1|var2)/.../p`.
Unfortunately, though, this use of alternation is not portable. For
instance, BSD-lineage `sed` (including macOS `sed`) does not support it
in the default "basic regular expression" mode (BRE). It may be possible
to enable "extended regular expression" mode (ERE) in some cases with
`sed -E`, however, `-E` is neither portable nor part of POSIX.
Fortunately, alternation is unnecessary in this case and can easily be
avoided, so replace it with a series of simple expressions such as
`s/^var1/.../p;s/^var2/.../p`.
While at it, tighten the expressions so they match the variable names
exactly rather than matching prefixes (i.e. use `s/^var1=/.../p`).
If the requirements of test_export() become more complex in the future,
then an alternative would be to replace `sed` with `perl` which supports
alternation on all platforms, however, the simple elimination of
alternation via multiple `sed` expressions suffices for the present.
Reported-by: Sangeeta <sangunb09@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's no need to display the annoying warning on every pull... only
the ones that are not fast-forward.
The current warning tests still pass, but not because of the arguments
or the configuration, but because they are all fast-forward.
We need to test non-fast-forward situations now.
Suggestions-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Refactor the advise() call that teaches users how they can choose
between merge and rebase into a helper function. This revealed that
the caller's logic needs to be further clarified to allow future
actions (like "erroring out" instead of the current "go ahead and
merge anyway") that should happen whether the advice message is
squelched out.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is easy enough to do, and gives a more descriptive name to the
variable that is scoped in a more focused way.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement cases where renames are involved in type changes (i.e. the
side of history that didn't rename the file changed its type from a
regular file to a symlink or submodule). There was some code to handle
this in merge-recursive but only in the special case when the renamed
file had no content changes. The code here works differently -- it
knows process_entry() can handle mode conflicts, so it does a few
minimal tweaks to ensure process_entry() can just finish the job as
needed.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement handling of normal renames. This code replaces the following
from merge-recurisve.c:
* the code relevant to RENAME_NORMAL in process_renames()
* the RENAME_NORMAL case of process_entry()
Also, there is some shared code from merge-recursive.c for multiple
different rename cases which we will no longer need for this case (or
other rename cases):
* handle_rename_normal()
* setup_rename_conflict_info()
The consolidation of four separate codepaths into one is made possible
by a change in design: process_renames() tweaks the conflict_info
entries within opt->priv->paths such that process_entry() can then
handle all the non-rename conflict types (directory/file, modify/delete,
etc.) orthogonally. This means we're much less likely to miss special
implementation of some kind of combination of conflict types (see
commits brought in by 66c62eaec6 ("Merge branch 'en/merge-tests'",
2020-11-18), especially commit ef52778708 ("merge tests: expect improved
directory/file conflict handling in ort", 2020-10-26) for more details).
That, together with letting worktree/index updating be handled
orthogonally in the merge_switch_to_result() function, dramatically
simplifies the code for various special rename cases.
(To be fair, the code for handling normal renames wasn't all that
complicated beforehand, but it's still much simpler now.)
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement rename/rename(2to1) and rename/add handling, i.e. a file is
renamed into a location where another file is added (with that other
file either being a plain add or itself coming from a rename). Note
that rename collisions can also have a special case stacked on top: the
file being renamed on one side of history is deleted on the other
(yielding either a rename/add/delete conflict or perhaps a
rename/rename(2to1)/delete[/delete]) conflict.
One thing to note here is that when there is a double rename, the code
in question only handles one of them at a time; a later iteration
through the loop will handle the other. After they've both been
handled, process_entry()'s normal add/add code can handle the collision.
This code replaces the following from merge-recurisve.c:
* all the 2to1 code in process_renames()
* the RENAME_TWO_FILES_TO_ONE case of process_entry()
* handle_rename_rename_2to1()
* handle_rename_add()
Also, there is some shared code from merge-recursive.c for multiple
different rename cases which we will no longer need for this case (or
other rename cases):
* handle_file_collision()
* setup_rename_conflict_info()
The consolidation of six separate codepaths into one is made possible
by a change in design: process_renames() tweaks the conflict_info
entries within opt->priv->paths such that process_entry() can then
handle all the non-rename conflict types (directory/file, modify/delete,
etc.) orthogonally. This means we're much less likely to miss special
implementation of some kind of combination of conflict types (see
commits brought in by 66c62eaec6 ("Merge branch 'en/merge-tests'",
2020-11-18), especially commit ef52778708 ("merge tests: expect improved
directory/file conflict handling in ort", 2020-10-26) for more details).
That, together with letting worktree/index updating be handled
orthogonally in the merge_switch_to_result() function, dramatically
simplifies the code for various special rename cases.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement rename/delete conflicts, i.e. one side renames a file and the
other deletes the file. This code replaces the following from
merge-recurisve.c:
* the code relevant to RENAME_DELETE in process_renames()
* the RENAME_DELETE case of process_entry()
* handle_rename_delete()
Also, there is some shared code from merge-recursive.c for multiple
different rename cases which we will no longer need for this case (or
other rename cases):
* handle_change_delete()
* setup_rename_conflict_info()
The consolidation of five separate codepaths into one is made possible
by a change in design: process_renames() tweaks the conflict_info
entries within opt->priv->paths such that process_entry() can then
handle all the non-rename conflict types (directory/file, modify/delete,
etc.) orthogonally. This means we're much less likely to miss special
implementation of some kind of combination of conflict types (see
commits brought in by 66c62eaec6 ("Merge branch 'en/merge-tests'",
2020-11-18), especially commit ef52778708 ("merge tests: expect improved
directory/file conflict handling in ort", 2020-10-26) for more details).
That, together with letting worktree/index updating be handled
orthogonally in the merge_switch_to_result() function, dramatically
simplifies the code for various special rename cases.
To be fair, there is a _slight_ tweak to process_entry() here, because
rename/delete cases will also trigger the modify/delete codepath.
However, we only want a modify/delete message to be printed for a
rename/delete conflict if there is a content change in the renamed file
in addition to the rename. So process_renames() and process_entry()
aren't quite fully orthogonal, but they are pretty close.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement rename/rename(1to2) handling, i.e. both sides of history
renaming a file and rename it differently. This code replaces the
following from merge-recurisve.c:
* all the 1to2 code in process_renames()
* the RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_TWO case of process_entry()
* handle_rename_rename_1to2()
Also, there is some shared code from merge-recursive.c for multiple
different rename cases which we will no longer need for this case (or
other rename cases):
* handle_file_collision()
* setup_rename_conflict_info()
The consolidation of five separate codepaths into one is made possible
by a change in design: process_renames() tweaks the conflict_info
entries within opt->priv->paths such that process_entry() can then
handle all the non-rename conflict types (directory/file, modify/delete,
etc.) orthogonally. This means we're much less likely to miss special
implementation of some kind of combination of conflict types (see
commits brought in by 66c62eaec6 ("Merge branch 'en/merge-tests'",
2020-11-18), especially commit ef52778708 ("merge tests: expect improved
directory/file conflict handling in ort", 2020-10-26) for more details).
That, together with letting worktree/index updating be handled
orthogonally in the merge_switch_to_result() function, dramatically
simplifies the code for various special rename cases.
To be fair, there is a _slight_ tweak to process_entry() here to make
sure that the two different paths aren't marked as clean but are left in
a conflicted state. So process_renames() and process_entry() aren't
quite entirely orthogonal, but they are pretty close.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Implement rename/rename(1to1) handling, i.e. both sides of history
renaming a file but renaming the same way. This code replaces the
following from merge-recurisve.c:
* all the 1to1 code in process_renames()
* the RENAME_ONE_FILE_TO_ONE case of process_entry()
Also, there is some shared code from merge-recursive.c for multiple
different rename cases which we will no longer need for this case (or
other rename cases):
* handle_rename_normal()
* setup_rename_conflict_info()
The consolidation of four separate codepaths into one is made possible
by a change in design: process_renames() tweaks the conflict_info
entries within opt->priv->paths such that process_entry() can then
handle all the non-rename conflict types (directory/file, modify/delete,
etc.) orthogonally. This means we're much less likely to miss special
implementation of some kind of combination of conflict types (see
commits brought in by 66c62eaec6 ("Merge branch 'en/merge-tests'",
2020-11-18), especially commit ef52778708 ("merge tests: expect improved
directory/file conflict handling in ort", 2020-10-26) for more details).
That, together with letting worktree/index updating be handled
orthogonally in the merge_switch_to_result() function, dramatically
simplifies the code for various special rename cases.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove this unreachable code. It was found by SunCC, it's found by a
non-fatal warning emitted by SunCC. It's one of the things it's more
vehement about than GCC & Clang.
It complains about a lot of other similarly unreachable code, e.g. a
BUG(...) without a "return", and a "return 0" after a long if/else,
both of whom have "return" statements. Those are also genuine
redundancies to a compiler, but arguably make the code a bit easier to
read & less fragile to maintain.
These return/break cases are just unnecessary however, and as seen
here the surrounding code just did a plain "return" without a "break"
already.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When 15b52a44 (compat-util: type-check parameters of no-op
replacement functions, 2020-08-06) turned a handful of no-op
C-preprocessor macros into static inline functions to give the
callers a better type checking for their parameters, it forgot
to return anything from the stubbed out setitimer() function,
even though the function was defined to return an int just like the
real thing.
Since the original C-preprocessor macro implementation was to just
turn the call to the function an empty statement, we know that the
existing callers do not check the return value from it, and it does
not matter what value we return. But it is safer to pretend that
the call succeeded by returning 0 than making it fail by returning -1
and clobbering errno with some value.
Reported-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Two "static inline" functions, both of which return void, call
strmap_remove() and tries to return the value it returns as their
return value, which is just bogus, as strmap_remove() returns void
itself. Call it in the void context and fall-thru the control to
the end instead.
Reported-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The subcommand is unusably slow and the reason why nobody reports it
as a performance bug is suspected to be the absense of users. Let's
show a big message that asks the user to tell us that they still
care about the command when an attempt is made to run the command,
with an escape hatch to override it with a command line option.
In a few releases, we may turn it into an error and keep it for a
few more releases before finally removing it (during the whole time,
the plan to remove it would be interrupted by end user raising hand).
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 0b4396f068, (git-p4: make python2.7 the oldest supported version,
2019-12-13) pointed out that git-p4 uses Python 2.7-or-later features
in the code.
In addition, git-p4 gained enough support for Python 3 from
6cec21a82f, (git-p4: encode/decode communication with p4 for
python3, 2019-12-13).
Let's update our documentation to reflect that fact.
Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test update.
* js/t5526-with-no-particular-primary-branch-name:
t5526: drop the prereq expecting the default branch name `main`
t5526: avoid depending on a specific default branch name
Tighten error checking in the codepath that responds to "git fetch".
* jk/check-config-parsing-error-in-upload-pack:
upload-pack: propagate return value from object filter config callback
Newer versions of xsltproc can assign IDs in HTML documents it
generates in a consistent manner. Use the feature to help format
HTML version of the user manual reproducibly.
* ae/doc-reproducible-html:
doc: make HTML manual reproducible
The glossary described a branch as an "active" line of development,
which is misleading---a stale and non-moving branch is still a
branch.
* so/glossary-branch-is-not-necessarily-active:
glossary: improve "branch" definition
"@" sometimes worked (e.g. "git push origin @:there") as a part of
a refspec element, but "git push origin @" did not work, which has
been corrected.
* fc/atmark-in-refspec:
refspec: make @ a synonym of HEAD
tests: push: trivial cleanup
tests: push: improve cleanup of HEAD tests
"git $cmd $args", when $cmd is not a recognised subcommand, by
default tries to see if $cmd is a typo of an existing subcommand
and optionally executes the corrected command if there is only one
possibility, depending on the setting of help.autocorrect; the
users can now disable the whole thing, including the cycles spent
to find a likely typo, by setting the configuration variable to
'never'.
* dd/help-autocorrect-never:
help.c: help.autocorrect=never means "do not compute suggestions"
register_rename_src() simply references the passed pair inside
rename_src. In contrast, add_rename_dst() did something entirely
different for rename_dst. Instead of copying the passed pair, it made a
copy of the second diff_filespec from the passed pair, referenced it,
and then set the diff_rename_dst.pair field to NULL. Later, when a
pairing is found, record_rename_pair() allocated a full diff_filepair
via diff_queue() and pointed its src and dst fields at the appropriate
diff_filespecs. This contrast between register_rename_src() for the
rename_src data structure and add_rename_dst() for the rename_dst data
structure is oddly inconsistent and requires more memory and work than
necessary. Let's just reference the original diff_filepair in
rename_dst as-is, just as we do with rename_src. Add a new
rename_dst.is_rename field, since the rename_dst.p field is never NULL
unlike the old rename_dst.pair field.
Taking advantage of this change and the fact that same-named paths will
be adjacent, we can get rid of the sorting of the array and most of the
lookups on it, allowing us to instead just append as we go. However,
there is one remaining reason to still keep locate_rename_dst():
handling broken pairs (i.e. when break detection is on). Those are
somewhat rare, but we can set up a simple strintmap to get the map
between the source and the index. Doing that allows us to still have a
fast lookup without sorting the rename_dst array. Since the sorting had
been done in a weakly quadratic manner, when many renames are involved
this time could add up.
There is still a strcmp() in add_rename_dst() that I have left in place
to make it easier to verify that the algorithm has the same results.
This strcmp() is there to check for duplicate destination entries (which
was the easiest way at the time to avoid segfaults in the
diffcore-rename code when trees had multiple entries at a given path).
The underlying double free()s are no longer an issue with the new
algorithm, but that can be addressed in a subsequent commit.
This patch is being submitted in a different order than its original
development, but in a large rebase of many commits with lots of renames
and with several optimizations to inexact rename detection, both setup
time and write back to output queue time from diffcore_rename() were
sizeable chunks of overall runtime. This patch accelerated the setup
time by about 65%, and final write back to the output queue time by
about 50%, resulting in an overall drop of 3.5% on the execution time of
rebasing a few dozen patches.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
register_rename_src() took pains to create an array in rename_src which
was sorted by pathname of the contained diff_filepair. The sorting was
entirely unnecessary since callers pass filepairs to us in sorted
order. We can simply append to the end of the rename_src array,
speeding up diffcore_rename() setup time.
Also, note that I dropped the return type on the function since it was
unconditionally discarded anyway.
This patch is being submitted in a different order than its original
development, but in a large rebase of many commits with lots of renames
and with several optimizations to inexact rename detection,
diffcore_rename() setup time was a sizeable chunk of overall runtime.
This patch dropped execution time of rebasing 35 commits with lots of
renames by 2% overall.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While creating the last commit, I found a number of other cases where
git would segfault when faced with trees that have duplicate entries.
None of these segfaults are in the diffcore-rename code (they all occur
in cache-tree and unpack-trees). Further, to my knowledge, no one has
ever been adversely affected by these bugs, and given that it has been
15 years and folks have fixed a few other issues with historical
duplicate entries (as noted in the last commit), I am not sure we will
ever run into anyone having problems with these. So I am not sure these
are worth fixing, but it doesn't hurt to at least document these
failures in the same test file that is concerned with duplicate tree
entries.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 4d6be03b95 ("diffcore-rename: avoid processing duplicate
destinations", 2015-02-26) added t4058 to demonstrate that a workaround
it added to avoid double frees (namely to just turn off rename detection
when trees had duplicate entries) would indeed avoid segfaults. The
tests, though, give the impression that the expected diffs are "correct"
when in reality they are just "don't segfault, and do something
semi-reasonable under the circumstances". Add some notes to make this
clearer.
Also, commit 25d5ea410f ("[PATCH] Redo rename/copy detection logic.",
2005-05-24) added a similar workaround to avoid segfaults, but for
rename_src rather than rename_dst. I do not see any tests in the
testsuite to cover the collision detection of entries limited to the
source side, so add a couple.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Inexact rename detection works by comparing all sources to all
destinations, computing similarities, and then finding the best matches
among those that are sufficiently similar.
However, it is preceded by exact rename detection that works by
checking if there are files with identical hashes. If exact renames are
found, we can exclude some files from inexact rename detection.
The inexact rename detection loops over the full set of files, but
immediately skips those for which rename_dst[i].is_rename is true and
thus doesn't compare any sources to that destination. As such, these
paths shouldn't be included in the progress counter.
For the eagle eyed, this change hints at an actual optimization -- the
first one I presented at Git Merge 2020. I'll be submitting that
optimization later, once the basic merge-ort algorithm has merged.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
diffcore-rename had two different checks of the form
if ((a < limit || b < limit) &&
a * b <= limit * limit)
This can be simplified to
if (st_mult(a, b) <= st_mult(limit, limit))
which makes it clearer how we are checking for overflow, and makes it
much easier to parse given the drop from 8 to 4 variable appearances.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
too_many_rename_candidates() got the number of rename destinations via
an argument to the function, but the number of rename sources via a
global variable. That felt rather inconsistent. Pass in the number of
rename sources as an argument as well.
While we are at it... We had a local variable, num_src, that served two
purposes. Initially it was set to the global value, but later was used
for counting a subset of the number of sources. Since we now have a
function argument for the former usage, introduce a clearer variable
name for the latter usage.
This patch has no behavioral changes; it's just renaming and passing an
argument instead of grabbing it from the global namespace. (You may
find it easier to view the patch using git diff's --color-words option.)
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our main data structures are rename_src and rename_dst. For counters of
these data structures, num_sources and num_destinations seem natural;
definitely more so than using num_create for the latter.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Eventually we want to be omit the advice when we can fast-forward
in which case there is no reason to require the user to choose
between rebase or merge.
In order to do so, we need to delay giving the advice up to the
point where we can check if we can fast-forward or not.
Additionally, config_get_rebase() was probably never its true home.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We would like to be able to make this check before the decision to
rebase is made in a future step. Besides, using a separate helper
makes the code easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add code which determines which kind of special rename case each rename
corresponds to, but leave the handling of each type unimplemented for
now. Future commits will implement each one.
There is some tenuous resemblance to merge-recursive's
process_renames(), but comparing the two is very unlikely to yield any
insights. merge-ort's process_renames() is a bit complex and I would
prefer if I could simplify it more, but it is far easier to grok than
merge-recursive's function of the same name in my opinion. Plus,
merge-ort handles more rename conflict types than merge-recursive does.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Johannes Schindelin
Junio C Hamano
Jiang Xin
Jean-Noël Avila
Baptiste Fontaine
Eric Sunshine
Emir Sarı
Felipe Contreras
Elijah Newren
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Peter Krefting
Đoàn Trần Công Danh