Although the various "Already up to date" messages resulting from merge
attempts share identical phrasing, they use a mix of punctuation ranging
from "." to "!" and even "Yeeah!", which leads to extra work for
translators. Ease the job of translators by settling upon "." as
punctuation for all such messages.
While at it, take advantage of printf_ln() to further ease the
translation task so translators need not worry about line termination,
and fix a case of missing line termination in the (unused)
merge_ort_nonrecursive() function.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a corner case bug in "git mv" on case insensitive systems,
which was introduced in 2.29 timeframe.
* tb/git-mv-icase-fix:
git mv foo FOO ; git mv foo bar gave an assert
CALLOC_ARRAY() macro replaces many uses of xcalloc().
* rs/calloc-array:
cocci: allow xcalloc(1, size)
use CALLOC_ARRAY
git-compat-util.h: drop trailing semicolon from macro definition
Fix macros that can silently inject unintended null-statements.
* rs/avoid-null-statement-after-macro-call:
mem-pool: drop trailing semicolon from macro definition
block-sha1: drop trailing semicolon from macro definition
The data structure used by fsmonitor interface was not properly
duplicated during an in-core merge, leading to use-after-free etc.
* js/fsmonitor-unpack-fix:
fsmonitor: do not forget to release the token in `discard_index()`
fsmonitor: fix memory corruption in some corner cases
"git bisect" reimplemented more in C during 2.30 timeframe did not
take an annotated tag as a good/bad endpoint well. This regression
has been corrected.
* jk/bisect-peel-tag-fix:
bisect: peel annotated tags to commits
The fsmonitor interface read from its input without making sure
there is something to read from. This bug is new in 2.31
timeframe.
* jh/fsmonitor-prework:
fsmonitor: avoid global-buffer-overflow READ when checking trivial response
In 56c6910028 (fsmonitor: change last update timestamp on the
index_state to opaque token, 2020-01-07), we forgot to adjust
`discard_index()` to release the "last-update" token: it is no longer a
64-bit number, but a free-form string that has been allocated.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 56c6910028 (fsmonitor: change last update timestamp on the
index_state to opaque token, 2020-01-07), we forgot to adjust the part
of `unpack_trees()` that copies the FSMonitor "last-update" information
that we copy from the source index to the result index since 679f2f9fdd
(unpack-trees: skip stat on fsmonitor-valid files, 2019-11-20).
Since the "last-update" information is no longer a 64-bit number, but a
free-form string that has been allocated, we need to duplicate it rather
than just copying it.
This is important because there _are_ cases when `unpack_trees()` will
perform a oneway merge that implicitly calls `refresh_fsmonitor()`
(which will allocate that "last-update" token). This happens _after_
that token was copied into the result index. However, we _then_ call
`check_updates()` on that index, which will _also_ call
`refresh_fsmonitor()`, accessing the "last-update" string, which by now
would be released already.
In the instance that lead to this patch, this caused a segmentation
fault during a lengthy, complicated rebase involving the todo command
`reset` that (crucially) had to updated many files. Unfortunately, it
seems very hard to trigger that crash, therefore this patch is not
accompanied by a regression test.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch fixes a bug where git-bisect doesn't handle receiving
annotated tags as "git bisect good <tag>", etc. It's a regression in
27257bc466 (bisect--helper: reimplement `bisect_state` & `bisect_head`
shell functions in C, 2020-10-15).
The original shell code called:
sha=$(git rev-parse --verify "$rev^{commit}") ||
die "$(eval_gettext "Bad rev input: \$rev")"
which will peel the input to a commit (or complain if that's not
possible). But the C code just calls get_oid(), which will yield the oid
of the tag.
The fix is to peel to a commit. The error message here is a little
non-idiomatic for Git (since it starts with a capital). I've mostly left
it, as it matches the other converted messages (like the "Bad rev input"
we print when get_oid() fails), though I did add an indication that it
was the peeling that was the problem. It might be worth taking a pass
through this converted code to modernize some of the error messages.
Note also that the test does a bare "grep" (not i18ngrep) on the
expected "X is the first bad commit" output message. This matches the
rest of the test script.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
4f37d45706 ("clone: respect remote unborn HEAD", 2021-02-05) introduces
a new feature (if the remote has an unborn HEAD, e.g. when the remote
repository is empty, use it as the name of the branch) that only works
in protocol v2, but did not ensure that one of its tests always uses
protocol v2, and thus that test would fail if
GIT_TEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION=0 (or 1) is used. Therefore, add "-c
protocol.version=2" to the appropriate test.
(The rest of the tests from that commit have "-c protocol.version=2"
already added.)
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow BLOCK_GROWTH_SIZE to be used like an integer literal by removing
the trailing semicolon from its definition. Also wrap the expression in
parentheses, to allow it to be used with operators without leading to
unexpected results. It doesn't matter for the current use site, but
make it follow standard macro rules anyway to avoid future surprises.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
23119ffb4e (block-sha1: put expanded macro parameters in parentheses,
2012-07-22) added a trailing semicolon to the definition of SHA_MIX
without explanation. It doesn't matter with the current code, but make
sure to avoid potential surprises by removing it again.
This allows the macro to be used almost like a function: Users can
combine it with operators of their choice, but still must not pass an
expression with side-effects as a parameter, as it would be evaluated
multiple times.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allocating a pre-cleared single element is quite common and it is
misleading to use CALLOC_ARRAY(); these allocations that would be
affected without this change are not allocating an array.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Disable the recent mergetool's hideresolved feature by default for
backward compatibility and safety.
* jn/mergetool-hideresolved-is-optional:
doc: describe mergetool configuration in git-mergetool(1)
mergetool: do not enable hideResolved by default
fc47391e24 (drop vcs-svn experiment, 2020-08-13) removed most vcs-svn
files. Drop the remaining header files as well, as they are no longer
used.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add and apply a semantic patch for converting code that open-codes
CALLOC_ARRAY to use it instead. It shortens the code and infers the
element size automatically.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make CALLOC_ARRAY usable like a function by requiring callers to supply
the trailing semicolon, which all of the current ones already do. With
the extra semicolon e.g. the following code wouldn't compile because it
disconnects the "else" from the "if":
if (condition)
CALLOC_ARRAY(ptr, n);
else
whatever();
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In particular, this describes mergetool.hideResolved, which can help
users discover this setting (either because it may be useful to them
or in order to understand mergetool's behavior if they have forgotten
setting it in the past).
Tested by running
make -C Documentation git-mergetool.1
man Documentation/git-mergetool.1
and reading through the page.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When 98ea309b3f (mergetool: add hideResolved configuration,
2021-02-09) introduced the mergetool.hideResolved setting to reduce
the clutter in viewing non-conflicted sections of files in a
mergetool, it enabled it by default, explaining:
No adverse effects were noted in a small survey of popular mergetools[1]
so this behavior defaults to `true`.
In practice, alas, adverse effects do appear. A few issues:
1. No indication is shown in the UI that the base, local, and remote
versions shown have been modified by additional resolution. This
is inherent in the design: the idea of mergetool.hideResolved is to
convince a mergetool that expects pristine local, base, and remote
files to show partially resolved verisons of those files instead;
there is no additional source of information accessible to the
mergetool to see where the resolution has happened.
(By contrast, a mergetool generating the partial resolution from
conflict markers for itself would be able to hilight the resolved
sections with a different color.)
A user accustomed to seeing the files without partial resolution
gets no indication that this behavior has changed when they upgrade
Git.
2. If the computed merge did not line up the files correctly (for
example due to repeated sections in the file), the partially
resolved files can be misleading and do not have enough information
to reconstruct what happened and compute the correct merge result.
3. Resolving a conflict can involve information beyond the textual
conflict. For example, if the local and remote versions added
overlapping functionality in different ways, seeing the full
unresolved versions of each alongside the base gives information
about each side's intent that makes it possible to come up with a
resolution that combines those two intents. By contrast, when
starting with partially resolved versions of those files, one can
produce a subtly wrong resolution that includes redundant extra
code added by one side that is not needed in the approach taken
on the other.
All that said, a user wanting to focus on textual conflicts with
reduced clutter can still benefit from mergetool.hideResolved=true as
a way to deemphasize sections of the code that resolve cleanly without
requiring any changes to the invoked mergetool. The caveats described
above are reduced when the user has explicitly turned this on, because
then the user is aware of them.
Flip the default to 'false'.
Reported-by: Dana Dahlstrom <dahlstrom@google.com>
Helped-by: Seth House <seth@eseth.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code to fsck objects received across multiple packs during a
single git fetch session has been broken when the packfile URI
feature was in use. A workaround has been added by disabling the
codepath to avoid keeping a packfile that is too small.
* jt/transfer-fsck-across-packs-fix:
fetch-pack: do not mix --pack_header and packfile uri
Clang no longer produces a libFuzzer.a. Instead, you can include
libFuzzer by using -fsanitize=fuzzer. Therefore we should use that in
the example command for building fuzzers.
We also add -fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link to the CFLAGS to ensure that all
the required instrumentation is added when compiling git [1], and remove
-fsanitize-coverage=trace-pc-guard as it is deprecated.
I happen to have tested with LLVM 11 - however -fsanitize=fuzzer appears
to work in a wide range of reasonably modern clangs.
(On my system: what used to be libFuzzer.a now lives under the following
path, which is tricky albeit not impossible for a novice such as myself
to find:
/usr/lib64/clang/11.0.0/lib/linux/libclang_rt.fuzzer-x86_64.a )
[1] https://releases.llvm.org/11.0.0/docs/LibFuzzer.html#fuzzer-usage
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hunt <ajrhunt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Pass the number of elements first and ther size second, as expected
by xcalloc(). Provide a semantic patch, which was actually used to
generate the rest of this patch.
The semantic patch would generate flip-flop diffs if both arguments
are sizeofs. We don't have such a case, and it's hard to imagine
the usefulness of such an allocation. If it ever occurs then we
could deal with it by duplicating the rule in the semantic patch to
make it cancel itself out, or we could change the code to use
CALLOC_ARRAY.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Eric Sunshine
Junio C Hamano
Johannes Schindelin
Kyle Meyer
Jeff King
Jonathan Tan
René Scharfe
Andrzej Hunt
Jiang Xin
Jonathan Nieder
Matthias Rüster
Daniel Santos
Tran Ngoc Quan
Christopher Diaz Riveros
Bagas Sanjaya