content(dnscrypt): partially reword the post
All checks were successful
continuous-integration/drone/push Build is passing

This commit is contained in:
surtur 2022-08-28 17:29:07 +02:00
parent bcd6f3bf1a
commit 6923776886
Signed by: wanderer
GPG Key ID: 19CE1EC1D9E0486D

@ -1,24 +1,29 @@
--- ---
title: "DNSCrypt" title: "DNSCrypt - running the server"
date: 2021-08-06T23:38:45+02:00 date: 2021-08-06T23:38:45+02:00
draft: false draft: false
toc: true toc: true
enableGitInfo: true enableGitInfo: true
lastmod: 2022-28-08T17:20:10+02:00
tags: [dnscrypt, dns, privacy, security, censorship] tags: [dnscrypt, dns, privacy, security, censorship]
--- ---
### why are you doing this? ### why are you doing this?
There are many publicly available [open resolvers using DoT, DoH or There are many publicly available [open resolvers using DoT, DoH or
DNSCrypt](https://dnscrypt.info/public-servers) to secure the traffic. However, DNSCrypt](https://dnscrypt.info/public-servers) just sitting around the
we have still felt the need to run our own, especially since it's such a interwebs, waiting to secure the DNS traffic and protect it from whoever is
critical part of the infrastructure. Since now it's a reality, we're offering looking.
it for public use.
However, we have still felt the need to run our own, especially since
DNS is such a critical piece of infrastructure.
And now we're offering it for public use.
### so what is it? ### so what is it?
What we're running is a non-censoring, non-logging, DNSSEC-capable, DNSCrypt-enabled DNS What we're running is a non-censoring, non-logging, DNSSEC-capable, DNSCrypt-enabled DNS
resolver using resolver using
[dnscrypt-server-docker](https://github.com/dnscrypt/dnscrypt-server-docker) project. [dnscrypt-server-docker](https://github.com/dnscrypt/dnscrypt-server-docker) project.
Our resolver is available over both IPv4 and IPv6. Of course, our resolver is available over both IPv4 and IPv6.
### can I haz some plz ### can I haz some plz
> Since the name servers are not (yet) a part of any listing of public > Since the name servers are not (yet) a part of any listing of public