[Proposal] Set up woodpecker CI #45

Open
opened 2 months ago by kreyren · 7 comments
kreyren commented 2 months ago

See https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker, it's droneCI that complies with 4 freedoms

See https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker, it's droneCI that complies with 4 freedoms
kreyren added the
proposal
label 2 months ago
Owner

Thanks for the proposal.
I am familiar with Woodpecker CI and I have been following the development a little.

Is the idea to also migrate dotya.ml stuff from Drono to Woodpecker?

I guess deploying a smaller, restricted testing instance wouldn't hurt for a start.

Or do you have a specific workload in mind @kreyren?

Thanks for the proposal. I am familiar with Woodpecker CI and I have been following the development a little. Is the idea to also migrate dotya.ml stuff from Drono to Woodpecker? I guess deploying a smaller, restricted testing instance wouldn't hurt for a start. Or do you have a specific workload in mind @kreyren?
Poster

If there aren't any limitations to the use of Woodpecker CI in comparison to DroneCI then i am for deprecating DroneCI else i like the idea of having both options.

Also can you make the CI to be available for people outside of dotya.ml? See my discussion with finaboo https://freespeech.firedragonstudios.com/web/statuses/106812422161729554

If there aren't any limitations to the use of Woodpecker CI in comparison to DroneCI then i am for deprecating DroneCI else i like the idea of having both options. Also can you make the CI to be available for people outside of dotya.ml? See my discussion with finaboo https://freespeech.firedragonstudios.com/web/statuses/106812422161729554
Owner

Drone cannot be used outside of a SCM and our instance is paired with this Gitea instance, I think Woodpecker works the same.

Checked the discussion, which reminds me the need to put together proper ToS (https://git.dotya.ml/dotya.ml/community/issues/16) and ToU.

I really am not a fan of 90GB repos full of game-assets, aside from the fact that we're probably not quite ready for that scale.

git.dotya.ml is a small, community-run instance, perhaps it'd be well suited to formulate a purpose/mission document or something.

Drone cannot be used outside of a SCM and our instance is paired with this Gitea instance, I think Woodpecker works the same. Checked the discussion, which reminds me the need to put together proper ToS (https://git.dotya.ml/dotya.ml/community/issues/16) and ToU. I really am not a fan of 90GB repos full of game-assets, aside from the fact that we're probably not quite ready for that scale. [git.dotya.ml](https://git.dotya.ml) is a small, community-run instance, perhaps it'd be well suited to formulate a *purpose/mission* document or something.
wanderer added this to the General project 2 months ago
Poster

Checked the discussion, which reminds me the need to put together proper ToS (https://git.dotya.ml/dotya.ml/community/issues/16) and ToU. -- @wanderer

Make a new repo and give me access to submit issues we will do some mapping of policies and i will propose you finished ToS/ToU

I really am not a fan of 90GB repos full of game-assets, aside from the fact that we're probably not quite ready for that scale. -- @wanderer

Would help to register dotya as spolek in czechia so that we can do economy management simmilar to codeberg or as spolecnost s rucenym omezenym to do some custom witchery.

git.dotya.ml is a small, community-run instance, perhaps it'd be well suited to formulate a purpose/mission document or something. -- @wanderer

I don't see a need for that would include that in the ToS/ToU

> Checked the discussion, which reminds me the need to put together proper ToS (https://git.dotya.ml/dotya.ml/community/issues/16) and ToU. -- @wanderer Make a new repo and give me access to submit issues we will do some mapping of policies and i will propose you finished ToS/ToU > I really am not a fan of 90GB repos full of game-assets, aside from the fact that we're probably not quite ready for that scale. -- @wanderer Would help to register dotya as spolek in czechia so that we can do economy management simmilar to codeberg or as spolecnost s rucenym omezenym to do some custom witchery. > git.dotya.ml is a small, community-run instance, perhaps it'd be well suited to formulate a purpose/mission document or something. -- @wanderer I don't see a need for that would include that in the ToS/ToU
Owner

Make a new repo and give me access to submit issues we will do some mapping of policies and i will propose you finished ToS/ToU

alright, thanks.

Would help to register dotya as spolek in czechia so that we can do economy management simmilar to codeberg or as spolecnost s rucenym omezenym to do some custom witchery.

yeah, this has been brought up befeore, you're right, this needs to get done but I can't quite get myself to it. btw the country would probably be slovakia but never mind, same thing.

I don't see a need for that would include that in the ToS/ToU

I meant as preventive measures etc.

> Make a new repo and give me access to submit issues we will do some mapping of policies and i will propose you finished ToS/ToU alright, thanks. > Would help to register dotya as spolek in czechia so that we can do economy management simmilar to codeberg or as spolecnost s rucenym omezenym to do some custom witchery. yeah, this has been brought up befeore, you're right, this needs to get done but I can't quite get myself to it. btw the country would probably be slovakia but never mind, same thing. > I don't see a need for that would include that in the ToS/ToU I meant as preventive measures etc.
Poster

I can propose you the legal work for registering codeberg-like organization if you want, but we have to agree on business plan or funding.

I can propose you the legal work for registering codeberg-like organization if you want, but we have to agree on business plan or funding.
Poster

Ideally contact me on matrix we can discuss these things

Ideally contact me on matrix we can discuss these things
Sign in to join this conversation.
Loading…
There is no content yet.