[Proposal] Set up woodpecker CI #45
Labels
No Label
FCKPTN
WIP
bug
docs done
docs needed
duplicate
enhancement
feature
gemini
invalid
legal-ish
needs help
onionz
proposal
question
resolved
security
spam
todo
upstream-related
wontfix
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: dotya.ml/community#45
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
See https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker, it's droneCI that complies with 4 freedoms
Thanks for the proposal.
I am familiar with Woodpecker CI and I have been following the development a little.
Is the idea to also migrate dotya.ml stuff from Drono to Woodpecker?
I guess deploying a smaller, restricted testing instance wouldn't hurt for a start.
Or do you have a specific workload in mind @kreyren?
If there aren't any limitations to the use of Woodpecker CI in comparison to DroneCI then i am for deprecating DroneCI else i like the idea of having both options.
Also can you make the CI to be available for people outside of dotya.ml? See my discussion with finaboo https://freespeech.firedragonstudios.com/web/statuses/106812422161729554
Drone cannot be used outside of a SCM and our instance is paired with this Gitea instance, I think Woodpecker works the same.
Checked the discussion, which reminds me the need to put together proper ToS (#16) and ToU.
I really am not a fan of 90GB repos full of game-assets, aside from the fact that we're probably not quite ready for that scale.
git.dotya.ml is a small, community-run instance, perhaps it'd be well suited to formulate a purpose/mission document or something.
Make a new repo and give me access to submit issues we will do some mapping of policies and i will propose you finished ToS/ToU
Would help to register dotya as spolek in czechia so that we can do economy management simmilar to codeberg or as spolecnost s rucenym omezenym to do some custom witchery.
I don't see a need for that would include that in the ToS/ToU
alright, thanks.
yeah, this has been brought up befeore, you're right, this needs to get done but I can't quite get myself to it. btw the country would probably be slovakia but never mind, same thing.
I meant as preventive measures etc.
I can propose you the legal work for registering codeberg-like organization if you want, but we have to agree on business plan or funding.
Ideally contact me on matrix we can discuss these things
I recently took a look at their GitHub and got a feeling the project is really moving forward and getting traction. and they now even got matrix builds and optionally split configs! inclined to give it a try.
@wanderer invoke
# pacman -Suy woodpecker-server woodpecker-ci
plz I want to use it to automate kreyren/pman soonRelevant: https://containers.fan/posts/setup-gitea-with-woodpecker-ci/
Should be the same process to DroneCI
@kreyren indeed, it should be a rather straight-forward set-up, I'll get it working soon™.
is that a threat? :D
i prefer the term 'motivational encouragement'~