legal: user-generated content #16

Open
opened 2020-11-05 07:24:30 +01:00 by kreyren · 9 comments

DISCLAIMER: I ain't your lawyer and this ain't no legal advise

According to the US law platforms like dotya are responsible for copyrighted material that might be present on them that is afaik not covered by the CDA230 (https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230)

Suggesting to adapt a DMCA handling method so that copyight holders can submit a publicly logged request for the content to be made private to avoid unwated lawsuit.

Or

Figure out a way to make the end-users responsible for the content on the platform (afaik not possible)

Relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_aspects_of_file_sharing
Relevant: https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/sharing-platforms-can-be-held-liable-for-copyright-infringement-rules-cjeu

**DISCLAIMER:** I ain't your lawyer and this ain't no legal advise According to the US law platforms like dotya are responsible for copyrighted material that might be present on them that is afaik not covered by the CDA230 (https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230) Suggesting to adapt a DMCA handling method so that copyight holders can submit a publicly logged request for the content to be made private to avoid unwated lawsuit. Or Figure out a way to make the end-users responsible for the content on the platform (afaik not possible) Relevant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_aspects_of_file_sharing Relevant: https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/sharing-platforms-can-be-held-liable-for-copyright-infringement-rules-cjeu
Owner

@kreyren so basically you are suggesting we figure out something you believe to be infeasible :D ?

@kreyren so basically you are suggesting we figure out something you believe to be infeasible :D ?
Author

@wanderer whaddya mean infeasible

@wanderer whaddya mean infeasible
Owner

@wanderer whaddya mean infeasible

this

Figure out a way to make the end-users responsible for the content on the platform (afaik not possible)

> @wanderer whaddya mean infeasible this > Figure out a way to make the end-users responsible for the content on the platform (afaik not possible)
Author

@wanderer dunno if i understand.. for the mentioned last time i checked it was impossible to do that legally in the US, but i ain't US lawyer

@wanderer dunno if i understand.. for the mentioned last time i checked it was impossible to do that legally in the US, but i ain't US lawyer
Owner

@wanderer dunno if i understand.. for the mentioned last time i checked it was impossible to do that legally in the US, but i ain't US lawyer

so you're saying we should go with the former option

> @wanderer dunno if i understand.. for the mentioned last time i checked it was impossible to do that legally in the US, but i ain't US lawyer so you're saying we should go with the former option
Author

yep while allowing the community to contribute to the code of conduct

yep while allowing the community to contribute to the code of conduct
Owner

yep while allowing the community to contribute to the code of conduct

right.

I started this, contribs are welcome.
https://git.dotya.ml/dotya.ml/CoC

Also - I am endorsing user responsibility - don't host stuff breaking the law here.

> yep while allowing the community to contribute to the code of conduct right. I started this, contribs are welcome. https://git.dotya.ml/dotya.ml/CoC Also - I am endorsing user responsibility - don't host stuff breaking the law here.
wanderer added this to the General project 2020-11-05 09:26:40 +01:00
Author

don't host stuff breaking the law here.

Breaking the law is subjective depending on the culture and juridistical area.. So it has to be explicitedly defined what is considered illegal.

e.g. Pretty sure that this symbol above allegedly randomly selected letter is illegal in slovakia, but legal in czech

Ř

> don't host stuff breaking the law here. Breaking the law is subjective depending on the culture and juridistical area.. So it has to be explicitedly defined what is considered illegal. e.g. Pretty sure that this symbol above allegedly randomly selected letter is illegal in slovakia, but legal in czech **Ř**
Owner

don't host stuff breaking the law here.

Breaking the law is subjective depending on the culture and juridistical area.. So it has to be explicitedly defined what is considered illegal.

e.g. Pretty sure that this symbol above allegedly randomly selected letter is illegal in slovakia, but legal in czech

Ř

well damn me..we're not talking this kind of legality
alright ToS + CoC make for a perfect pair of guardians here

> > don't host stuff breaking the law here. > > Breaking the law is subjective depending on the culture and juridistical area.. So it has to be explicitedly defined what is considered illegal. > > e.g. Pretty sure that this symbol above allegedly randomly selected letter is illegal in slovakia, but legal in czech > > **Ř** well damn me..we're not talking this kind of legality alright ToS + CoC make for a perfect pair of guardians here
wanderer added this to the v1.0 milestone 2020-11-17 21:26:58 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No description provided.