From 080b3330159a19407dddb407dc917925ac40c4d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jack O'Connor <oconnor663@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 23:46:29 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] explicitly #error on big-endian ARM

---
 c/blake3_neon.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/c/blake3_neon.c b/c/blake3_neon.c
index 46691f5..a6f6da9 100644
--- a/c/blake3_neon.c
+++ b/c/blake3_neon.c
@@ -2,7 +2,12 @@
 
 #include <arm_neon.h>
 
-// TODO: This is probably incorrect for big-endian ARM. How should that work?
+#ifdef __ARM_BIG_ENDIAN
+#error "This implementation only supports little-endian ARM."
+// It might be that all we need for big-endian support here is to get the loads
+// and stores right, but step zero would be finding a way to test it in CI.
+#endif
+
 INLINE uint32x4_t loadu_128(const uint8_t src[16]) {
   // vld1q_u32 has alignment requirements. Don't use it.
   uint32x4_t x;