1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-06-03 14:36:10 +02:00
git/t/t6016-rev-list-graph-simpli...
Antonio Russo c8302c6c00 t6016: move to lib-log-graph.sh framework
t6016 manually reconstructs git log --graph output by using the reported
commit hashes from `git rev-parse`.  Each tag is converted into an
environment variable manually, and then `echo`-ed to an expected output
file, which is in turn compared to the actual output.

The expected output is difficult to read and write, because, e.g.,
each line of output must be prefaced with echo, quoted, and properly
escaped.  Additionally, the test is sensitive to trailing whitespace,
which may potentially be removed from graph log output in the future.

In order to reduce duplication, ease troubleshooting of failed tests by
improving readability, and ease the addition of more tests to this file,
port the operations to `lib-log-graph.sh`, which is already used in
several other tests, e.g., t4215.  Give all merges a simple commit
message, and use a common `check_graph` macro taking a heredoc of the
expected output which does not required extensive escaping.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Russo <aerusso@aerusso.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-04 12:20:49 -08:00

244 lines
3.6 KiB
Bash
Executable File

#!/bin/sh
# There's more than one "correct" way to represent the history graphically.
# These tests depend on the current behavior of the graphing code. If the
# graphing code is ever changed to draw the output differently, these tests
# cases will need to be updated to know about the new layout.
test_description='--graph and simplified history'
. ./test-lib.sh
. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-log-graph.sh
check_graph () {
cat >expect &&
lib_test_cmp_graph --format=%s "$@"
}
test_expect_success 'set up rev-list --graph test' '
# 3 commits on branch A
test_commit A1 foo.txt &&
test_commit A2 bar.txt &&
test_commit A3 bar.txt &&
git branch -m master A &&
# 2 commits on branch B, started from A1
git checkout -b B A1 &&
test_commit B1 foo.txt &&
test_commit B2 abc.txt &&
# 2 commits on branch C, started from A2
git checkout -b C A2 &&
test_commit C1 xyz.txt &&
test_commit C2 xyz.txt &&
# Octopus merge B and C into branch A
git checkout A &&
git merge B C -m A4 &&
git tag A4 &&
test_commit A5 bar.txt &&
# More commits on C, then merge C into A
git checkout C &&
test_commit C3 foo.txt &&
test_commit C4 bar.txt &&
git checkout A &&
git merge -s ours C -m A6 &&
git tag A6 &&
test_commit A7 bar.txt
'
test_expect_success '--graph --all' '
check_graph --all <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
| * C3
* | A5
| |
| \
*-. | A4
|\ \|
| | * C2
| | * C1
| * | B2
| * | B1
* | | A3
| |/
|/|
* | A2
|/
* A1
EOF
'
# Make sure the graph_is_interesting() code still realizes
# that undecorated merges are interesting, even with --simplify-by-decoration
test_expect_success '--graph --simplify-by-decoration' '
git tag -d A4 &&
check_graph --all --simplify-by-decoration <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
| * C3
* | A5
| |
| \
*-. | A4
|\ \|
| | * C2
| | * C1
| * | B2
| * | B1
* | | A3
| |/
|/|
* | A2
|/
* A1
EOF
'
test_expect_success 'setup: get rid of decorations on B' '
git tag -d B2 &&
git tag -d B1 &&
git branch -d B
'
# Graph with branch B simplified away
test_expect_success '--graph --simplify-by-decoration prune branch B' '
check_graph --simplify-by-decoration --all <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
| * C3
* | A5
* | A4
|\|
| * C2
| * C1
* | A3
|/
* A2
* A1
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph --full-history -- bar.txt' '
check_graph --full-history --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
* | A5
* | A4
|\|
* | A3
|/
* A2
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph --full-history --simplify-merges -- bar.txt' '
check_graph --full-history --simplify-merges --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
* | A5
* | A3
|/
* A2
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph -- bar.txt' '
check_graph --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
* A7
* A5
* A3
| * C4
|/
* A2
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph --sparse -- bar.txt' '
check_graph --sparse --all -- bar.txt <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
* A5
* A4
* A3
| * C4
| * C3
| * C2
| * C1
|/
* A2
* A1
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph ^C4' '
check_graph --all ^C4 <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
* A5
* A4
|\
| * B2
| * B1
* A3
EOF
'
test_expect_success '--graph ^C3' '
check_graph --all ^C3 <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
* A5
* A4
|\
| * B2
| * B1
* A3
EOF
'
# I don't think the ordering of the boundary commits is really
# that important, but this test depends on it. If the ordering ever changes
# in the code, we'll need to update this test.
test_expect_success '--graph --boundary ^C3' '
check_graph --boundary --all ^C3 <<-\EOF
* A7
* A6
|\
| * C4
* | A5
| |
| \
*-. \ A4
|\ \ \
| * | | B2
| * | | B1
* | | | A3
o | | | A2
|/ / /
o / / A1
/ /
| o C3
|/
o C2
EOF
'
test_done