mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-11-18 17:13:55 +01:00
ff9054627c
git-rebase uses format-patch's --ignore-if-in-upstream
option, but we never document the user-visible behavior. The
example is placed near the top of the example list rather
than at the bottom because it is:
a. a simple example
b. a reasonably common scenario for many projects (mail
some patches which get accepted upstream, then rebase)
[sp: Corrected direction of 'HEAD..<upstream>' set comparsion]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
405 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
405 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
git-rebase(1)
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
----
|
|
git-rebase - Forward-port local commits to the updated upstream head
|
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS
|
|
--------
|
|
[verse]
|
|
'git-rebase' [-i | --interactive] [-v | --verbose] [-m | --merge]
|
|
[-C<n>] [ --whitespace=<option>] [-p | --preserve-merges]
|
|
[--onto <newbase>] <upstream> [<branch>]
|
|
'git-rebase' --continue | --skip | --abort
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
-----------
|
|
If <branch> is specified, git-rebase will perform an automatic
|
|
`git checkout <branch>` before doing anything else. Otherwise
|
|
it remains on the current branch.
|
|
|
|
All changes made by commits in the current branch but that are not
|
|
in <upstream> are saved to a temporary area. This is the same set
|
|
of commits that would be shown by `git log <upstream>..HEAD`.
|
|
|
|
The current branch is reset to <upstream>, or <newbase> if the
|
|
--onto option was supplied. This has the exact same effect as
|
|
`git reset --hard <upstream>` (or <newbase>).
|
|
|
|
The commits that were previously saved into the temporary area are
|
|
then reapplied to the current branch, one by one, in order. Note that
|
|
any commits in HEAD which introduce the same textual changes as a commit
|
|
in HEAD..<upstream> are omitted (i.e., a patch already accepted upstream
|
|
with a different commit message or timestamp will be skipped).
|
|
|
|
It is possible that a merge failure will prevent this process from being
|
|
completely automatic. You will have to resolve any such merge failure
|
|
and run `git rebase --continue`. Another option is to bypass the commit
|
|
that caused the merge failure with `git rebase --skip`. To restore the
|
|
original <branch> and remove the .dotest working files, use the command
|
|
`git rebase --abort` instead.
|
|
|
|
Assume the following history exists and the current branch is "topic":
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
A---B---C topic
|
|
/
|
|
D---E---F---G master
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
From this point, the result of either of the following commands:
|
|
|
|
|
|
git-rebase master
|
|
git-rebase master topic
|
|
|
|
would be:
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
A'--B'--C' topic
|
|
/
|
|
D---E---F---G master
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
The latter form is just a short-hand of `git checkout topic`
|
|
followed by `git rebase master`.
|
|
|
|
If the upstream branch already contains a change you have made (e.g.,
|
|
because you mailed a patch which was applied upstream), then that commit
|
|
will be skipped. For example, running `git-rebase master` on the
|
|
following history (in which A' and A introduce the same set of changes,
|
|
but have different committer information):
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
A---B---C topic
|
|
/
|
|
D---E---A'---F master
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
will result in:
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
B'---C' topic
|
|
/
|
|
D---E---A'---F master
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
Here is how you would transplant a topic branch based on one
|
|
branch to another, to pretend that you forked the topic branch
|
|
from the latter branch, using `rebase --onto`.
|
|
|
|
First let's assume your 'topic' is based on branch 'next'.
|
|
For example feature developed in 'topic' depends on some
|
|
functionality which is found in 'next'.
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
o---o---o---o---o master
|
|
\
|
|
o---o---o---o---o next
|
|
\
|
|
o---o---o topic
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
We would want to make 'topic' forked from branch 'master',
|
|
for example because the functionality 'topic' branch depend on
|
|
got merged into more stable 'master' branch, like this:
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
o---o---o---o---o master
|
|
| \
|
|
| o'--o'--o' topic
|
|
\
|
|
o---o---o---o---o next
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
We can get this using the following command:
|
|
|
|
git-rebase --onto master next topic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another example of --onto option is to rebase part of a
|
|
branch. If we have the following situation:
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
H---I---J topicB
|
|
/
|
|
E---F---G topicA
|
|
/
|
|
A---B---C---D master
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
then the command
|
|
|
|
git-rebase --onto master topicA topicB
|
|
|
|
would result in:
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
H'--I'--J' topicB
|
|
/
|
|
| E---F---G topicA
|
|
|/
|
|
A---B---C---D master
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
This is useful when topicB does not depend on topicA.
|
|
|
|
A range of commits could also be removed with rebase. If we have
|
|
the following situation:
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
E---F---G---H---I---J topicA
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
then the command
|
|
|
|
git-rebase --onto topicA~5 topicA~3 topicA
|
|
|
|
would result in the removal of commits F and G:
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
E---H'---I'---J' topicA
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
This is useful if F and G were flawed in some way, or should not be
|
|
part of topicA. Note that the argument to --onto and the <upstream>
|
|
parameter can be any valid commit-ish.
|
|
|
|
In case of conflict, git-rebase will stop at the first problematic commit
|
|
and leave conflict markers in the tree. You can use git diff to locate
|
|
the markers (<<<<<<) and make edits to resolve the conflict. For each
|
|
file you edit, you need to tell git that the conflict has been resolved,
|
|
typically this would be done with
|
|
|
|
|
|
git add <filename>
|
|
|
|
|
|
After resolving the conflict manually and updating the index with the
|
|
desired resolution, you can continue the rebasing process with
|
|
|
|
|
|
git rebase --continue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you can undo the git-rebase with
|
|
|
|
|
|
git rebase --abort
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS
|
|
-------
|
|
<newbase>::
|
|
Starting point at which to create the new commits. If the
|
|
--onto option is not specified, the starting point is
|
|
<upstream>. May be any valid commit, and not just an
|
|
existing branch name.
|
|
|
|
<upstream>::
|
|
Upstream branch to compare against. May be any valid commit,
|
|
not just an existing branch name.
|
|
|
|
<branch>::
|
|
Working branch; defaults to HEAD.
|
|
|
|
--continue::
|
|
Restart the rebasing process after having resolved a merge conflict.
|
|
|
|
--abort::
|
|
Restore the original branch and abort the rebase operation.
|
|
|
|
--skip::
|
|
Restart the rebasing process by skipping the current patch.
|
|
|
|
-m, \--merge::
|
|
Use merging strategies to rebase. When the recursive (default) merge
|
|
strategy is used, this allows rebase to be aware of renames on the
|
|
upstream side.
|
|
|
|
-s <strategy>, \--strategy=<strategy>::
|
|
Use the given merge strategy; can be supplied more than
|
|
once to specify them in the order they should be tried.
|
|
If there is no `-s` option, a built-in list of strategies
|
|
is used instead (`git-merge-recursive` when merging a single
|
|
head, `git-merge-octopus` otherwise). This implies --merge.
|
|
|
|
-v, \--verbose::
|
|
Display a diffstat of what changed upstream since the last rebase.
|
|
|
|
-C<n>::
|
|
Ensure at least <n> lines of surrounding context match before
|
|
and after each change. When fewer lines of surrounding
|
|
context exist they all must match. By default no context is
|
|
ever ignored.
|
|
|
|
--whitespace=<nowarn|warn|error|error-all|strip>::
|
|
This flag is passed to the `git-apply` program
|
|
(see gitlink:git-apply[1]) that applies the patch.
|
|
|
|
-i, \--interactive::
|
|
Make a list of the commits which are about to be rebased. Let the
|
|
user edit that list before rebasing. This mode can also be used to
|
|
split commits (see SPLITTING COMMITS below).
|
|
|
|
-p, \--preserve-merges::
|
|
Instead of ignoring merges, try to recreate them. This option
|
|
only works in interactive mode.
|
|
|
|
include::merge-strategies.txt[]
|
|
|
|
NOTES
|
|
-----
|
|
When you rebase a branch, you are changing its history in a way that
|
|
will cause problems for anyone who already has a copy of the branch
|
|
in their repository and tries to pull updates from you. You should
|
|
understand the implications of using 'git rebase' on a repository that
|
|
you share.
|
|
|
|
When the git rebase command is run, it will first execute a "pre-rebase"
|
|
hook if one exists. You can use this hook to do sanity checks and
|
|
reject the rebase if it isn't appropriate. Please see the template
|
|
pre-rebase hook script for an example.
|
|
|
|
You must be in the top directory of your project to start (or continue)
|
|
a rebase. Upon completion, <branch> will be the current branch.
|
|
|
|
INTERACTIVE MODE
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
Rebasing interactively means that you have a chance to edit the commits
|
|
which are rebased. You can reorder the commits, and you can
|
|
remove them (weeding out bad or otherwise unwanted patches).
|
|
|
|
The interactive mode is meant for this type of workflow:
|
|
|
|
1. have a wonderful idea
|
|
2. hack on the code
|
|
3. prepare a series for submission
|
|
4. submit
|
|
|
|
where point 2. consists of several instances of
|
|
|
|
a. regular use
|
|
1. finish something worthy of a commit
|
|
2. commit
|
|
b. independent fixup
|
|
1. realize that something does not work
|
|
2. fix that
|
|
3. commit it
|
|
|
|
Sometimes the thing fixed in b.2. cannot be amended to the not-quite
|
|
perfect commit it fixes, because that commit is buried deeply in a
|
|
patch series. That is exactly what interactive rebase is for: use it
|
|
after plenty of "a"s and "b"s, by rearranging and editing
|
|
commits, and squashing multiple commits into one.
|
|
|
|
Start it with the last commit you want to retain as-is:
|
|
|
|
git rebase -i <after-this-commit>
|
|
|
|
An editor will be fired up with all the commits in your current branch
|
|
(ignoring merge commits), which come after the given commit. You can
|
|
reorder the commits in this list to your heart's content, and you can
|
|
remove them. The list looks more or less like this:
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
pick deadbee The oneline of this commit
|
|
pick fa1afe1 The oneline of the next commit
|
|
...
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The oneline descriptions are purely for your pleasure; `git-rebase` will
|
|
not look at them but at the commit names ("deadbee" and "fa1afe1" in this
|
|
example), so do not delete or edit the names.
|
|
|
|
By replacing the command "pick" with the command "edit", you can tell
|
|
`git-rebase` to stop after applying that commit, so that you can edit
|
|
the files and/or the commit message, amend the commit, and continue
|
|
rebasing.
|
|
|
|
If you want to fold two or more commits into one, replace the command
|
|
"pick" with "squash" for the second and subsequent commit. If the
|
|
commits had different authors, it will attribute the squashed commit to
|
|
the author of the first commit.
|
|
|
|
In both cases, or when a "pick" does not succeed (because of merge
|
|
errors), the loop will stop to let you fix things, and you can continue
|
|
the loop with `git rebase --continue`.
|
|
|
|
For example, if you want to reorder the last 5 commits, such that what
|
|
was HEAD~4 becomes the new HEAD. To achieve that, you would call
|
|
`git-rebase` like this:
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
$ git rebase -i HEAD~5
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
And move the first patch to the end of the list.
|
|
|
|
You might want to preserve merges, if you have a history like this:
|
|
|
|
------------------
|
|
X
|
|
\
|
|
A---M---B
|
|
/
|
|
---o---O---P---Q
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
Suppose you want to rebase the side branch starting at "A" to "Q". Make
|
|
sure that the current HEAD is "B", and call
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
$ git rebase -i -p --onto Q O
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPLITTING COMMITS
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
In interactive mode, you can mark commits with the action "edit". However,
|
|
this does not necessarily mean that 'git rebase' expects the result of this
|
|
edit to be exactly one commit. Indeed, you can undo the commit, or you can
|
|
add other commits. This can be used to split a commit into two:
|
|
|
|
- Start an interactive rebase with 'git rebase -i <commit>^', where
|
|
<commit> is the commit you want to split. In fact, any commit range
|
|
will do, as long as it contains that commit.
|
|
|
|
- Mark the commit you want to split with the action "edit".
|
|
|
|
- When it comes to editing that commit, execute 'git reset HEAD^'. The
|
|
effect is that the HEAD is rewound by one, and the index follows suit.
|
|
However, the working tree stays the same.
|
|
|
|
- Now add the changes to the index that you want to have in the first
|
|
commit. You can use gitlink:git-add[1] (possibly interactively) and/or
|
|
gitlink:git-gui[1] to do that.
|
|
|
|
- Commit the now-current index with whatever commit message is appropriate
|
|
now.
|
|
|
|
- Repeat the last two steps until your working tree is clean.
|
|
|
|
- Continue the rebase with 'git rebase --continue'.
|
|
|
|
If you are not absolutely sure that the intermediate revisions are
|
|
consistent (they compile, pass the testsuite, etc.) you should use
|
|
gitlink:git-stash[1] to stash away the not-yet-committed changes
|
|
after each commit, test, and amend the commit if fixes are necessary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authors
|
|
------
|
|
Written by Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> and
|
|
Johannes E. Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
|
|
|
|
Documentation
|
|
--------------
|
|
Documentation by Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
|
|
|
|
GIT
|
|
---
|
|
Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite
|