mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-11-19 09:13:55 +01:00
da4902a730
In v1.7.4-rc0~11^2~2 (bash: get --pretty=m<tab> completion to work with bash v4, 2010-12-02) we started to use _get_comp_words_by_ref() to access completion-related variables. That was large change, and to make it easily reviewable, we invoked _get_comp_words_by_ref() in each completion function and systematically replaced every occurance of bash's completion-related variables ($COMP_WORDS and $COMP_CWORD) with variables set by _get_comp_words_by_ref(). This has the downside that _get_comp_words_by_ref() is invoked several times during a single completion. The worst offender is perhaps 'git log mas<TAB>': during the completion of 'master' _get_comp_words_by_ref() is invoked no less than six times. However, the variables $prev, $cword, and $words provided by _get_comp_words_by_ref() are not modified in any of the completion functions, and the previous commit ensures that the $cur variable is not modified as well. This makes it possible to invoke _get_comp_words_by_ref() to get those variables only once in our toplevel completion functions _git() and _gitk(), and all other completion functions will inherit them. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| blameview | ||
| buildsystems | ||
| ciabot | ||
| completion | ||
| continuous | ||
| convert-objects | ||
| emacs | ||
| examples | ||
| fast-import | ||
| git-shell-commands | ||
| gitview | ||
| hg-to-git | ||
| hooks | ||
| p4import | ||
| patches | ||
| stats | ||
| svn-fe | ||
| thunderbird-patch-inline | ||
| vim | ||
| workdir | ||
| git-resurrect.sh | ||
| README | ||
| remotes2config.sh | ||
| rerere-train.sh | ||
Contributed Software Although these pieces are available as part of the official git source tree, they are in somewhat different status. The intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them, and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved faster. I am not expecting to touch these myself that much. As far as my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are owned by their respective primary authors. I am willing to help if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners" have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree owners. IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch. If you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer). This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the drill. I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused and inactive ones from time to time. If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves there are some general interests (it does not have to be a list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport), submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your stuff there. -jc