mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-06-02 12:56:31 +02:00
db8a9ff038
Linus reported that the bash completion for git show often dropped the ref portion of the argument (stuff before the :) when trying to complete a file name of a file in another branch or tag. Björn Steinbrink tracked it down to the gvfs completion script which comes standard on many Fedora Core based systems. That is removing : from COMP_WORDBREAKS, making readline treat the entire argument (including the ref) as the name that must be completed. When the git completion routines supplied a completion of just the filename, readline replaced everything. Since Git users often need to use "ref:path" or "ref:ref" sort of arguments, and expect completion support on both sides of the : we really want the : in COMP_WORDBREAKS to provide a good user experience. This is also the default that ships with bash as it can be useful in other contexts, such as rcp/scp. We now try to add : back to COMP_WORDBREAKS if it has been removed by a script that loaded before us. However if this doesn't work (as the : is stripped after we load) we fallback in the completion routines to include "ref:" as part of the prefix for completions, allowing readine to fully insert the argument the user wanted. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| blameview | ||
| completion | ||
| continuous | ||
| convert-objects | ||
| emacs | ||
| examples | ||
| fast-import | ||
| gitview | ||
| hg-to-git | ||
| hooks | ||
| p4import | ||
| patches | ||
| stats | ||
| vim | ||
| workdir | ||
| README | ||
| remotes2config.sh | ||
Contributed Software Although these pieces are available as part of the official git source tree, they are in somewhat different status. The intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them, and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved faster. I am not expecting to touch these myself that much. As far as my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are owned by their respective primary authors. I am willing to help if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners" have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree owners. IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch. If you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer). This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the drill. I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused and inactive ones from time to time. If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves there are some general interests (it does not have to be a list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport), submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your stuff there. -jc