1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-05-24 03:46:12 +02:00
Commit Graph

121 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mike Crowe e00dd1e948 describe: Add --first-parent option
Only consider the first parent commit when walking the commit history. This
is useful if you only wish to match tags on your branch after a merge.

Signed-off-by: Mike Crowe <mac@mcrowe.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-20 11:09:03 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 4744b33705 Merge branch 'jc/describe'
The "--match=<pattern>" option of "git describe", when used with
"--all" to allow refs that are not annotated tags to be used as a
base of description, did not restrict the output from the command
to those that match the given pattern.

We may want to have a looser matching that does not restrict to tags,
but that can be done as a follow-up topic; this step is purely a bugfix.

* jc/describe:
  describe: --match=<pattern> must limit the refs even when used with --all
2013-03-25 14:00:24 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 46e1d6eb4d describe: --match=<pattern> must limit the refs even when used with --all
The logic to limit the refs used for describing with a matching pattern
with --match=<pattern> parameter was implemented incorrectly when --all
is in effect.  It just demoted a ref that did not match the pattern to
lower priority---if there aren't other refs with higher priority
that describe the given commit, such an unmatching ref was still used.

When --match is used, reject refs that do not match the given
criteria, so that with or without --all, the output will only use
refs that match the pattern.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-28 13:53:00 -08:00
Greg Price 48dfe969fc Fix ".git/refs" stragglers
A couple of references still survive to .git/refs as a tree
of all refs.  Fix one in docs, one in a -h message, one in
a -h message quoted in docs.

Signed-off-by: Greg Price <price@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-02-24 22:23:32 -08:00
Jeff King 315ea32f1b Merge branch 'jk/peel-ref'
Speeds up "git upload-pack" (what is invoked by "git fetch" on the
other side of the connection) by reducing the cost to advertise the
branches and tags that are available in the repository.

* jk/peel-ref:
  upload-pack: use peel_ref for ref advertisements
  peel_ref: check object type before loading
  peel_ref: do not return a null sha1
  peel_ref: use faster deref_tag_noverify
2012-10-25 06:42:27 -04:00
Jeff King e6dbffa67b peel_ref: do not return a null sha1
The idea of the peel_ref function is to dereference tag
objects recursively until we hit a non-tag, and return the
sha1. Conceptually, it should return 0 if it is successful
(and fill in the sha1), or -1 if there was nothing to peel.

However, the current behavior is much more confusing. For a
regular loose ref, the behavior is as described above. But
there is an optimization to reuse the peeled-ref value for a
ref that came from a packed-refs file. If we have such a
ref, we return its peeled value, even if that peeled value
is null (indicating that we know the ref definitely does
_not_ peel).

It might seem like such information is useful to the caller,
who would then know not to bother loading and trying to peel
the object. Except that they should not bother loading and
trying to peel the object _anyway_, because that fallback is
already handled by peel_ref. In other words, the whole point
of calling this function is that it handles those details
internally, and you either get a sha1, or you know that it
is not peel-able.

This patch catches the null sha1 case internally and
converts it into a -1 return value (i.e., there is nothing
to peel). This simplifies callers, which do not need to
bother checking themselves.

Two callers are worth noting:

  - in pack-objects, a comment indicates that there is a
    difference between non-peelable tags and unannotated
    tags. But that is not the case (before or after this
    patch). Whether you get a null sha1 has to do with
    internal details of how peel_ref operated.

  - in show-ref, if peel_ref returns a failure, the caller
    tries to decide whether to try peeling manually based on
    whether the REF_ISPACKED flag is set. But this doesn't
    make any sense. If the flag is set, that does not
    necessarily mean the ref came from a packed-refs file
    with the "peeled" extension. But it doesn't matter,
    because even if it didn't, there's no point in trying to
    peel it ourselves, as peel_ref would already have done
    so. In other words, the fallback peeling is guaranteed
    to fail.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-04 20:34:28 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy bfb0737d96 i18n: describe: mark parseopt strings for translation
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-08-20 12:23:16 -07:00
Allan Caffee bb571486ae describe: Refresh the index when run with --dirty
When running git describe --dirty the index should be refreshed.  Previously
the cached index would cause describe to think that the index was dirty when,
in reality, it was just stale.

The issue was exposed by python setuptools which hardlinks files into another
directory when building a distribution.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-08-11 13:03:35 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 6c80cd298a Merge branch 'ab/i18n-st'
* ab/i18n-st: (69 commits)
  i18n: git-shortlog basic messages
  i18n: git-revert split up "could not revert/apply" message
  i18n: git-revert literal "me" messages
  i18n: git-revert "Your local changes" message
  i18n: git-revert basic messages
  i18n: git-notes GIT_NOTES_REWRITE_MODE error message
  i18n: git-notes basic commands
  i18n: git-gc "Auto packing the repository" message
  i18n: git-gc basic messages
  i18n: git-describe basic messages
  i18n: git-clean clean.requireForce messages
  i18n: git-clean basic messages
  i18n: git-bundle basic messages
  i18n: git-archive basic messages
  i18n: git-status "renamed: " message
  i18n: git-status "Initial commit" message
  i18n: git-status "Changes to be committed" message
  i18n: git-status shortstatus messages
  i18n: git-status "nothing to commit" messages
  i18n: git-status basic messages
  ...

Conflicts:
	builtin/branch.c
	builtin/checkout.c
	builtin/clone.c
	builtin/commit.c
	builtin/grep.c
	builtin/merge.c
	builtin/push.c
	builtin/revert.c
	t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh
	t/t7607-merge-overwrite.sh
2011-04-01 17:55:55 -07:00
Junio C Hamano da2584243e Merge branch 'lt/default-abbrev'
* lt/default-abbrev:
  Rename core.abbrevlength back to core.abbrev
  Make the default abbrev length configurable
2011-03-23 14:55:40 -07:00
Linus Torvalds dce9648916 Make the default abbrev length configurable
The default of 7 comes from fairly early in git development, when
seven hex digits was a lot (it covers about 250+ million hash
values). Back then I thought that 65k revisions was a lot (it was what
we were about to hit in BK), and each revision tends to be about 5-10
new objects or so, so a million objects was a big number.

These days, the kernel isn't even the largest git project, and even
the kernel has about 220k revisions (_much_ bigger than the BK tree
ever was) and we are approaching two million objects. At that point,
seven hex digits is still unique for a lot of them, but when we're
talking about just two orders of magnitude difference between number
of objects and the hash size, there _will_ be collisions in truncated
hash values. It's no longer even close to unrealistic - it happens all
the time.

We should both increase the default abbrev that was unrealistically
small, _and_ add a way for people to set their own default per-project
in the git config file.

This is the first step to first make it configurable; the default of 7
is not raised yet.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-11 14:42:54 -08:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason e41f1cb36b i18n: git-describe basic messages
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-03-09 23:52:57 -08:00
Linus Torvalds 11f944dd6b for_each_hash: allow passing a 'void *data' pointer to callback
For the find_exact_renames() function, this allows us to pass the
diff_options structure pointer to the low-level routines.  We will use
that to distinguish between the "rename" and "copy" cases.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-18 22:25:51 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 716958c9a2 Merge branch 'tf/commit-list-prefix'
* tf/commit-list-prefix:
  commit: Add commit_list prefix in two function names.

Conflicts:
	sha1_name.c
2010-12-22 14:40:17 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg d1645d02de describe: Delay looking up commits until searching for an inexact match
Now that struct commit.util is not used until after we've checked that
the argument doesn't exactly match a tag, we can wait until then to
look up the commits for each tag.

This avoids a lot of I/O on --exact-match queries in repositories with
many tags.  For example, 'git describe --exact-match HEAD' becomes
about 12 times faster on a cold cache (3.2s instead of 39s) in a
linux-2.6 repository with 2000 packed tags.  That is a huge win for the
interactivity of the __git_ps1 shell prompt helper when on a detached
HEAD.

Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@ksplice.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-09 11:20:26 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg 3cfa4db322 describe: Store commit_names in a hash table by commit SHA1
describe is currently forced to look up the commit at each tag in
order to store the struct commit_name pointers in struct commit.util.
For --exact-match queries, those lookups are wasteful.  In preparation
for removing them, put the commit_names into a hash table, indexed by
commit SHA1, that can be used to quickly check for exact matches.

Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@ksplice.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-09 11:20:26 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg 1e1ade1833 describe: Do not use a flex array in struct commit_name
Now add_to_known_names overwrites commit_names in place when multiple
tags point to the same commit.  This will make it easier to store
commit_names in a hash table.

Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@ksplice.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-09 11:20:25 -08:00
Anders Kaseorg 56a5f3afa7 describe: Use for_each_rawref
Don't waste time checking for dangling refs; they wouldn't affect the
output of 'git describe' anyway.  Although this does not gain much
performance by itself, it does in conjunction with the next commits.

Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@ksplice.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-12-09 11:20:25 -08:00
Thiago Farina 47e44ed1dc commit: Add commit_list prefix in two function names.
Add commit_list prefix to insert_by_date function and to sort_by_date,
so it's clear that these functions refer to commit_list structure.

Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-11-29 14:01:52 -08:00
Junio C Hamano e22d62d915 Merge branch 'sp/maint-describe-tiebreak-with-tagger-date'
* sp/maint-describe-tiebreak-with-tagger-date:
  describe: Break annotated tag ties by tagger date
  tag.c: Parse tagger date (if present)
  tag.c: Refactor parse_tag_buffer to be saner to program
  tag.h: Remove unused signature field
  tag.c: Correct indentation
2010-05-21 04:02:17 -07:00
Linus Torvalds 81b50f3ce4 Move 'builtin-*' into a 'builtin/' subdirectory
This shrinks the top-level directory a bit, and makes it much more
pleasant to use auto-completion on the thing. Instead of

	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab>
	Display all 180 possibilities? (y or n)
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-sh
	builtin-shortlog.c     builtin-show-branch.c  builtin-show-ref.c
	builtin-shortlog.o     builtin-show-branch.o  builtin-show-ref.o
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shor<tab>
	builtin-shortlog.c  builtin-shortlog.o
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shortlog.c

you get

	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab>		[type]
	builtin/   builtin.h
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin		[auto-completes to]
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sh<tab>	[type]
	shortlog.c     shortlog.o     show-branch.c  show-branch.o  show-ref.c     show-ref.o
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sho		[auto-completes to]
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shor<tab>	[type]
	shortlog.c  shortlog.o
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shortlog.c

which doesn't seem all that different, but not having that annoying
break in "Display all 180 possibilities?" is quite a relief.

NOTE! If you do this in a clean tree (no object files etc), or using an
editor that has auto-completion rules that ignores '*.o' files, you
won't see that annoying 'Display all 180 possibilities?' message - it
will just show the choices instead.  I think bash has some cut-off
around 100 choices or something.

So the reason I see this is that I'm using an odd editory, and thus
don't have the rules to cut down on auto-completion.  But you can
simulate that by using 'ls' instead, or something similar.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-22 14:29:41 -08:00