In "dir_struct", each exclusion element in the exclusion stack records a
base string (pointer to the beginning with length) so that we can tell
where it came from, but this pointer is just pointing at the parameter
that is given by the caller to the push_exclude_per_directory()
function.
While read_directory_recursive() runs, calls to excluded() makes use
the data in the exclusion elements, including this base string. The
caller of read_directory_recursive() is not supposed to free the
buffer it gave to push_exclude_per_directory() earlier, until it
returns.
The test case Bruce Stephens gave in the mailing list discussion
was simplified and added to the t3700 test.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows to refresh only a subset of the project files, based on
the specified pathspecs.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The hashed contents did not matter in the end result, but it passed
an uninitialized variable to printf, which caused it to emit empty
while giving an error/usage message.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 20314271679e169f324c118c69c8d9e0399feec9 git add was fixed if unmerged
entries are in the index and core.filemode=false. core.symlinks=false is
a similar case, which touches the same code path. Here is a test that
makes sure that the symlink property in the index is preserved, too.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a merge left unmerged entries, git add failed to pick up the
file mode from the index, when core.filemode == 0. If more than one
unmerged entry is there, the order of stage preference is 2, 1, 3.
Noticed by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The function common_prefix() is used to find the common subdirectory of
a couple of pathnames. When checking if the next pathname matches up with
the prefix, it incorrectly checked the whole path, not just the prefix
(including the slash). Thus, the expensive part of the loop was executed
always.
The other bug is more serious: if the first and the last pathname in the
list have a longer common prefix than the common prefix for _all_ pathnames
in the list, the longer one would be chosen. This bug was probably hidden
by the fact that bash's wildcard expansion sorts the results, and the code
just so happens to work with sorted input.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When we do not trust executable bit from lstat(2), we copied
existing ce_mode bits without checking if the filesystem object
is a regular file (which is the only thing we apply the "trust
executable bit" business) nor if the blob in the index is a
regular file (otherwise, we should do the same as registering a
new regular file, which is to default non-executable).
Noticed by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When '*.ig' is ignored, and you have two files f.ig and d.ig/foo
in the working tree,
$ git add .
correctly ignored f.ig but failed to ignore d.ig/foo. This was
caused by a thinko in an earlier commit 4888c534, when we tried
to allow adding otherwise ignored files.
After reverting that commit, this takes a much simpler approach.
When we have an unmatched pathspec that talks about an existing
pathname, we know it is an ignored path the user tried to add,
so we include it in the set of paths directory walker returned.
This does not let you say "git add -f D" on an ignored directory
D and add everything under D. People can submit a patch to
further allow it if they want to, but I think it is a saner
behaviour to require explicit paths to be spelled out in such a
case.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
An earlier commit f28b34a broke symlinks when trust-executable-bit
is not set because it incorrectly assumed that everything was a
regular file.
Reported by Juergen Ruehle.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This test should be testing update-index --add, not git-add as the
latter is implemented in terms of the former.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If the user has configured core.filemode=0 then we shouldn't set
the execute bit in the index when adding a new file as the user
has indicated that the local filesystem can't be trusted.
This means that when adding files that should be marked executable
in a repository with core.filemode=0 the user must perform a
'git update-index --chmod=+x' on the file before committing the
addition.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This adds support to git-add to allow the common -- to separate
command-line options and file names. It adds documentation and a new
git-add test case as well.
[jc: this should apply to 1.2.X maintenance series, so I reworked
git-ls-files --error-unmatch test. ]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
