1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-05-14 09:16:10 +02:00
Commit Graph

112 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeff King aa9ad6fee5 bitmaps: don't recurse into trees already in the bitmap
If an object is already mentioned in a reachability bitmap we are
building, then by definition so are all of the objects it can reach. We
have an optimization to stop traversing commits when we see they are
already in the bitmap, but we don't do the same for trees.

It's generally unavoidable to recurse into trees for commits not yet
covered by bitmaps (since most commits generally do have unique
top-level trees). But they usually have subtrees that are shared with
other commits (i.e., all of the subtrees the commit _didn't_ touch). And
some of those commits (and their trees) may be covered by the bitmap.

Usually this isn't _too_ big a deal, because we'll visit those subtrees
only once in total for the whole walk. But if you have a large number of
unbitmapped commits, and if your tree is big, then you may end up
opening a lot of sub-trees for no good reason.

We can use the same optimization we do for commits here: when we are
about to open a tree, see if it's in the bitmap (either the one we are
building, or the "seen" bitmap which covers the UNINTERESTING side of
the bitmap when doing a set-difference).

This works especially well because we'll visit all commits before
hitting any trees. So even in a history like:

  A -- B

if "A" has a bitmap on disk but "B" doesn't, we'll already have OR-ed in
the results from A before looking at B's tree (so we really will only
look at trees touched by B).

For most repositories, the timings produced by p5310 are unspectacular.
Here's linux.git:

  Test                         HEAD^             HEAD
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.4: simulated clone      6.00(5.90+0.10)   5.98(5.90+0.08) -0.3%
  5310.5: simulated fetch      2.98(5.45+0.18)   2.85(5.31+0.18) -4.4%
  5310.7: rev-list (commits)   0.32(0.29+0.03)   0.33(0.30+0.03) +3.1%
  5310.8: rev-list (objects)   1.48(1.44+0.03)   1.49(1.44+0.05) +0.7%

Any improvement there is within the noise (the +3.1% on test 7 has to be
noise, since we are not recursing into trees, and thus the new code
isn't even run). The results for git.git are likewise uninteresting.

But here are numbers from some other real-world repositories (that are
not public). This one's tree is comparable in size to linux.git, but has
~16k refs (and so less complete bitmap coverage):

  Test                         HEAD^               HEAD
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.4: simulated clone      38.34(39.86+0.74)   33.95(35.53+0.76) -11.5%
  5310.5: simulated fetch      2.29(6.31+0.35)     2.20(5.97+0.41) -3.9%
  5310.7: rev-list (commits)   0.99(0.86+0.13)     0.96(0.85+0.11) -3.0%
  5310.8: rev-list (objects)   11.32(11.04+0.27)   6.59(6.37+0.21) -41.8%

And here's another with a very large tree (~340k entries), and a fairly
large number of refs (~10k):

  Test                         HEAD^               HEAD
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.3: simulated clone      53.83(54.71+1.54)   39.77(40.76+1.50) -26.1%
  5310.4: simulated fetch      19.91(20.11+0.56)   19.79(19.98+0.67) -0.6%
  5310.6: rev-list (commits)   0.54(0.44+0.11)     0.51(0.43+0.07) -5.6%
  5310.7: rev-list (objects)   24.32(23.59+0.73)   9.85(9.49+0.36) -59.5%

This patch provides substantial improvements in these larger cases, and
have any drawbacks for smaller ones (the cost of the bitmap check is
quite small compared to an actual tree traversal).

Note that we have to add a version of revision.c's include_check
callback which handles non-commits. We could possibly consolidate this
into a single callback for all objects types, as there's only one user
of the feature which would need converted (pack-bitmap.c:should_include).
That would in theory let us avoid duplicating any logic. But when I
tried it, the code ended up much worse to read, with lots of repeated
"if it's a commit do this, otherwise do that". Having two separate
callbacks splits that naturally, and matches the existing split of
show_commit/show_object callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-06-15 11:13:11 +09:00
Junio C Hamano 8585d6c04a Merge branch 'ps/rev-list-object-type-filter'
"git rev-list" learns the "--filter=object:type=<type>" option,
which can be used to exclude objects of the given kind from the
packfile generated by pack-objects.

* ps/rev-list-object-type-filter:
  rev-list: allow filtering of provided items
  pack-bitmap: implement combined filter
  pack-bitmap: implement object type filter
  list-objects: implement object type filter
  list-objects: support filtering by tag and commit
  list-objects: move tag processing into its own function
  revision: mark commit parents as NOT_USER_GIVEN
  uploadpack.txt: document implication of `uploadpackfilter.allow`
2021-05-07 12:47:41 +09:00
Junio C Hamano 6e08cbdf38 Merge branch 'jk/prune-with-bitmap-fix'
When the reachability bitmap is in effect, the "do not lose
recently created objects and those that are reachable from them"
safety to protect us from races were disabled by mistake, which has
been corrected.

* jk/prune-with-bitmap-fix:
  prune: save reachable-from-recent objects with bitmaps
  pack-bitmap: clean up include_check after use
2021-05-07 12:47:38 +09:00
Jeff King 1e951c6473 pack-bitmap: clean up include_check after use
When a bitmap walk has to traverse (to fill in non-bitmapped objects),
we use rev_info's include_check mechanism to let us stop the traversal
early. But after setting the function and its data parameter, we never
clean it up. This means that if the rev_info is used for a subsequent
traversal without bitmaps, it will unexpectedly call into our
include_check function (worse, it will do so pointing to a now-defunct
stack variable in include_check_data, likely resulting in a segfault).

There's no code which does this now, but it's an accident waiting to
happen. Let's clean up after ourselves in the bitmap code.

Reported-by: David Emett <dave@sp4m.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-29 10:03:46 +09:00
Patrick Steinhardt 9cf68b27d5 rev-list: allow filtering of provided items
When providing an object filter, it is currently impossible to also
filter provided items. E.g. when executing `git rev-list HEAD` , the
commit this reference points to will be treated as user-provided and is
thus excluded from the filtering mechanism. This makes it harder than
necessary to properly use the new `--filter=object:type` filter given
that even if the user wants to only see blobs, he'll still see commits
of provided references.

Improve this by introducing a new `--filter-provided-objects` option
to the git-rev-parse(1) command. If given, then all user-provided
references will be subject to filtering.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-19 14:09:11 -07:00
Patrick Steinhardt 169a15ebd6 pack-bitmap: implement combined filter
When the user has multiple objects filters specified, then this is
internally represented by having a "combined" filter. These combined
filters aren't yet supported by bitmap indices and can thus not be
accelerated.

Fix this by implementing support for these combined filters. The
implementation is quite trivial: when there's a combined filter, we
simply recurse into `filter_bitmap()` for all of the sub-filters.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-19 14:09:11 -07:00
Patrick Steinhardt 7ab6aafa58 pack-bitmap: implement object type filter
The preceding commit has added a new object filter for git-rev-list(1)
which allows to filter objects by type. Implement the equivalent filter
for packfile bitmaps so that we can answer these queries fast.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-19 14:09:11 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 0623669fc6 Merge branch 'tb/pack-preferred-tips-to-give-bitmap'
A configuration variable has been added to force tips of certain
refs to be given a reachability bitmap.

* tb/pack-preferred-tips-to-give-bitmap:
  builtin/pack-objects.c: respect 'pack.preferBitmapTips'
  t/helper/test-bitmap.c: initial commit
  pack-bitmap: add 'test_bitmap_commits()' helper
2021-04-13 15:28:50 -07:00
Junio C Hamano 58840e62a4 Merge branch 'ps/pack-bitmap-optim'
Optimize "rev-list --use-bitmap-index --objects" corner case that
uses negative tags as the stopping points.

* ps/pack-bitmap-optim:
  pack-bitmap: avoid traversal of objects referenced by uninteresting tag
2021-04-07 16:54:09 -07:00
Taylor Blau 3f267a1128 builtin/pack-objects.c: respect 'pack.preferBitmapTips'
When writing a new pack with a bitmap, it is sometimes convenient to
indicate some reference prefixes which should receive priority when
selecting which commits to receive bitmaps.

A truly motivated caller could accomplish this by setting
'pack.islandCore', (since all commits in the core island are similarly
marked as preferred) but this requires callers to opt into using delta
islands, which they may or may not want to do.

Introduce a new multi-valued configuration, 'pack.preferBitmapTips' to
allow callers to specify a list of reference prefixes. All references
which have a prefix contained in 'pack.preferBitmapTips' will mark their
tips as "preferred" in the same way as commits are marked as preferred
for selection by 'pack.islandCore'.

The choice of the verb "prefer" is intentional: marking the NEEDS_BITMAP
flag on an object does *not* guarantee that that object will receive a
bitmap. It merely guarantees that that commit will receive a bitmap over
any *other* commit in the same window by bitmap_writer_select_commits().

The test this patch adds reflects this quirk, too. It only tests that
a commit (which didn't receive bitmaps by default) is selected for
bitmaps after changing the value of 'pack.preferBitmapTips' to include
it. Other commits may lose their bitmaps as a byproduct of how the
selection process works (bitmap_writer_select_commits() ignores the
remainder of a window after seeing a commit with the NEEDS_BITMAP flag).

This configuration will aide in selecting important references for
multi-pack bitmaps, since they do not respect the same pack.islandCore
configuration. (They could, but doing so may be confusing, since it is
packs--not bitmaps--which are influenced by the delta-islands
configuration).

In a fork network repository (one which lists all forks of a given
repository as remotes), for example, it is useful to set
pack.preferBitmapTips to 'refs/remotes/<root>/heads' and
'refs/remotes/<root>/tags', where '<root>' is an opaque identifier
referring to the repository which is at the base of the fork chain.

Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-03-31 23:14:03 -07:00
Taylor Blau dff5e49e51 pack-bitmap: add 'test_bitmap_commits()' helper
The next patch will add a 'bitmap' test-tool which prints the list of
commits that have bitmaps computed.

The test helper could implement this itself, but it would need access to
the 'bitmaps' field of the 'pack_bitmap' struct. To avoid exposing this
private detail, implement the entirety of the helper behind a
test_bitmap_commits() function in pack-bitmap.c.

There is some precedence for this with test_bitmap_walk() which is used
to implement the '--test-bitmap' flag in 'git rev-list' (and is also
implemented in pack-bitmap.c).

A caller will be added in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-03-31 23:14:03 -07:00
Patrick Steinhardt 540cdc11ad pack-bitmap: avoid traversal of objects referenced by uninteresting tag
When preparing the bitmap walk, we first establish the set of of have
and want objects by iterating over the set of pending objects: if an
object is marked as uninteresting, it's declared as an object we already
have, otherwise as an object we want. These two sets are then used to
compute which transitively referenced objects we need to obtain.

One special case here are tag objects: when a tag is requested, we
resolve it to its first not-tag object and add both resolved objects as
well as the tag itself into either the have or want set. Given that the
uninteresting-property always propagates to referenced objects, it is
clear that if the tag is uninteresting, so are its children and vice
versa. But we fail to propagate the flag, which effectively means that
referenced objects will always be interesting except for the case where
they have already been marked as uninteresting explicitly.

This mislabeling does not impact correctness: we now have it in our
"wants" set, and given that we later do an `AND NOT` of the bitmaps of
"wants" and "haves" sets it is clear that the result must be the same.
But we now start to needlessly traverse the tag's referenced objects in
case it is uninteresting, even though we know that each referenced
object will be uninteresting anyway. In the worst case, this can lead to
a complete graph walk just to establish that we do not care for any
object.

Fix the issue by propagating the `UNINTERESTING` flag to pointees of tag
objects and add a benchmark with negative revisions to p5310. This shows
some nice performance benefits, tested with linux.git:

Test                                                          HEAD~                  HEAD
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5310.3: repack to disk                                        193.18(181.46+16.42)   194.61(183.41+15.83) +0.7%
5310.4: simulated clone                                       25.93(24.88+1.05)      25.81(24.73+1.08) -0.5%
5310.5: simulated fetch                                       2.64(5.30+0.69)        2.59(5.16+0.65) -1.9%
5310.6: pack to file (bitmap)                                 58.75(57.56+6.30)      58.29(57.61+5.73) -0.8%
5310.7: rev-list (commits)                                    1.45(1.18+0.26)        1.46(1.22+0.24) +0.7%
5310.8: rev-list (objects)                                    15.35(14.22+1.13)      15.30(14.23+1.07) -0.3%
5310.9: rev-list with tag negated via --not --all (objects)   22.49(20.93+1.56)      0.11(0.09+0.01) -99.5%
5310.10: rev-list with negative tag (objects)                 0.61(0.44+0.16)        0.51(0.35+0.16) -16.4%
5310.11: rev-list count with blob:none                        12.15(11.19+0.96)      12.18(11.19+0.99) +0.2%
5310.12: rev-list count with blob:limit=1k                    17.77(15.71+2.06)      17.75(15.63+2.12) -0.1%
5310.13: rev-list count with tree:0                           1.69(1.31+0.38)        1.68(1.28+0.39) -0.6%
5310.14: simulated partial clone                              20.14(19.15+0.98)      19.98(18.93+1.05) -0.8%
5310.16: clone (partial bitmap)                               12.78(13.89+1.07)      12.72(13.99+1.01) -0.5%
5310.17: pack to file (partial bitmap)                        42.07(45.44+2.72)      41.44(44.66+2.80) -1.5%
5310.18: rev-list with tree filter (partial bitmap)           0.44(0.29+0.15)        0.46(0.32+0.14) +4.5%

While most benchmarks are probably in the range of noise, the newly
added 5310.9 and 5310.10 benchmarks consistenly perform better.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-03-22 12:10:56 -07:00
René Scharfe ca56dadb4b use CALLOC_ARRAY
Add and apply a semantic patch for converting code that open-codes
CALLOC_ARRAY to use it instead.  It shortens the code and infers the
element size automatically.

Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-03-13 16:00:09 -08:00
Jeff King 16950f8384 rev-list: add --disk-usage option for calculating disk usage
It can sometimes be useful to see which refs are contributing to the
overall repository size (e.g., does some branch have a bunch of objects
not found elsewhere in history, which indicates that deleting it would
shrink the size of a clone).

You can find that out by generating a list of objects, getting their
sizes from cat-file, and then summing them, like:

    git rev-list --objects --no-object-names main..branch
    git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectsize:disk)' |
    perl -lne '$total += $_; END { print $total }'

Though note that the caveats from git-cat-file(1) apply here. We "blame"
base objects more than their deltas, even though the relationship could
easily be flipped. Still, it can be a useful rough measure.

But one problem is that it's slow to run. Teaching rev-list to sum up
the sizes can be much faster for two reasons:

  1. It skips all of the piping of object names and sizes.

  2. If bitmaps are in use, for objects that are in the
     bitmapped packfile we can skip the oid_object_info()
     lookup entirely, and just ask the revindex for the
     on-disk size.

This patch implements a --disk-usage option which produces the same
answer in a fraction of the time. Here are some timings using a clone of
torvalds/linux:

  [rev-list piped to cat-file, no bitmaps]
  $ time git rev-list --objects --no-object-names --all |
    git cat-file --buffer --batch-check='%(objectsize:disk)' |
    perl -lne '$total += $_; END { print $total }'
  1459938510
  real	0m29.635s
  user	0m38.003s
  sys	0m1.093s

  [internal, no bitmaps]
  $ time git rev-list --disk-usage --objects --all
  1459938510
  real	0m31.262s
  user	0m30.885s
  sys	0m0.376s

Even though the wall-clock time is slightly worse due to parallelism,
notice the CPU savings between the two. We saved 21% of the CPU just by
avoiding the pipes.

But the real win is with bitmaps. If we use them without the new option:

  [rev-list piped to cat-file, bitmaps]
  $ time git rev-list --objects --no-object-names --all --use-bitmap-index |
    git cat-file --batch-check='%(objectsize:disk)' |
    perl -lne '$total += $_; END { print $total }'
  1459938510
  real	0m6.244s
  user	0m8.452s
  sys	0m0.311s

then we're faster to generate the list of objects, but we still spend a
lot of time piping and looking things up. But if we do both together:

  [internal, bitmaps]
  $ time git rev-list --disk-usage --objects --all --use-bitmap-index
  1459938510
  real	0m0.219s
  user	0m0.169s
  sys	0m0.049s

then we get the same answer much faster.

For "--all", that answer will correspond closely to "du objects/pack",
of course. But we're actually checking reachability here, so we're still
fast when we ask for more interesting things:

  $ time git rev-list --disk-usage --use-bitmap-index v5.0..v5.10
  374798628
  real	0m0.429s
  user	0m0.356s
  sys	0m0.072s

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-02-11 09:57:55 -08:00
Taylor Blau 78232bf65d rebuild_existing_bitmaps(): convert to new revindex API
Remove another instance of looking at the revindex directly by instead
calling 'pack_pos_to_index()'. Unlike other patches, this caller only
cares about the index position of each object in the loop.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-13 21:53:46 -08:00
Taylor Blau 011f3fd5cd try_partial_reuse(): convert to new revindex API
Remove another instance of direct revindex manipulation by calling
'pack_pos_to_offset()' instead (the caller here does not care about the
index position of the object at position 'pos').

Note that we cannot just use the existing "offset" variable to store the
value we get from pack_pos_to_offset(). It is incremented by
unpack_object_header(), but we later need the original value. Since
we'll no longer have revindex->offset to read it from, we'll store that
in a separate variable ("header" since it points to the entry's header
bytes).

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-13 21:53:46 -08:00
Taylor Blau a78a90324d get_size_by_pos(): convert to new revindex API
Remove another caller that holds onto a 'struct revindex_entry' by
replacing the direct indexing with calls to 'pack_pos_to_offset()' and
'pack_pos_to_index()'.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-13 21:53:46 -08:00
Taylor Blau cf98f2e8e0 show_objects_for_type(): convert to new revindex API
Avoid storing the revindex entry directly, since this structure will
soon be removed from the public interface. Instead, store the offset and
index position by calling 'pack_pos_to_offset()' and
'pack_pos_to_index()', respectively.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-13 21:53:46 -08:00
Taylor Blau 57665086af bitmap_position_packfile(): convert to new revindex API
Replace find_revindex_position() with its counterpart in the new API,
offset_to_pack_pos().

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-01-13 21:53:45 -08:00
Taylor Blau 83578051a9 pack-bitmap: factor out 'add_commit_to_bitmap()'
'find_objects()' currently needs to interact with the bitmaps khash
pretty closely. To make 'find_objects()' read a little more
straightforwardly, remove some of the khash-level details into a new
function that describes what it does: 'add_commit_to_bitmap()'.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-08 14:49:06 -08:00
Taylor Blau 98c31f366a pack-bitmap: factor out 'bitmap_for_commit()'
A couple of callers within pack-bitmap.c duplicate logic to lookup a
given object id in the bitamps khash. Factor this out into a new
function, 'bitmap_for_commit()' to reduce some code duplication.

Make this new function non-static, since it will be used in later
commits from outside of pack-bitmap.c.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-08 14:49:04 -08:00
Jeff King 449fa5ee06 pack-bitmap-write: ignore BITMAP_FLAG_REUSE
The on-disk bitmap format has a flag to mark a bitmap to be "reused".
This is a rather curious feature, and works like this:

  - a run of pack-objects would decide to mark the last 80% of the
    bitmaps it generates with the reuse flag

  - the next time we generate bitmaps, we'd see those reuse flags from
    the last run, and mark those commits as special:

      - we'd be more likely to select those commits to get bitmaps in
        the new output

      - when generating the bitmap for a selected commit, we'd reuse the
        old bitmap as-is (rearranging the bits to match the new pack, of
        course)

However, neither of these behaviors particularly makes sense.

Just because a commit happened to be bitmapped last time does not make
it a good candidate for having a bitmap this time. In particular, we may
choose bitmaps based on how recent they are in history, or whether a ref
tip points to them, and those things will change. We're better off
re-considering fresh which commits are good candidates.

Reusing the existing bitmap _is_ a reasonable thing to do to save
computation. But only reusing exact bitmaps is a weak form of this. If
we have an old bitmap for A and now want a new bitmap for its child, we
should be able to compute that only by looking at trees and that are new
to the child. But this code would consider only exact reuse (which is
perhaps why it was eager to select those commits in the first place).

Furthermore, the recent switch to the reverse-edge algorithm for
generating bitmaps dropped this optimization entirely (and yet still
performs better).

So let's do a few cleanups:

 - drop the whole "reusing bitmaps" phase of generating bitmaps. It's
   not helping anything, and is mostly unused code (or worse, code that
   is using CPU but not doing anything useful)

 - drop the use of the on-disk reuse flag to select commits to bitmap

 - stop setting the on-disk reuse flag in bitmaps we generate (since
   nothing respects it anymore)

We will keep a few innards of the reuse code, which will help us
implement a more capable version of the "reuse" optimization:

 - simplify rebuild_existing_bitmaps() into a function that only builds
   the mapping of bits between the old and new orders, but doesn't
   actually convert any bitmaps

 - make rebuild_bitmap() public; we'll call it lazily to convert bitmaps
   as we traverse (using the mapping created above)

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-08 14:48:17 -08:00
Taylor Blau c6b0c3910c pack-bitmap.c: check reads more aggressively when loading
Before 'load_bitmap_entries_v1()' reads an actual EWAH bitmap, it should
check that it can safely do so by ensuring that there are at least 6
bytes available to be read (four for the commit's index position, and
then two more for the xor offset and flags, respectively).

Likewise, it should check that the commit index it read refers to a
legitimate object in the pack.

The first fix catches a truncation bug that was exposed when testing,
and the second is purely precautionary.

There are some possible future improvements, not pursued here. They are:

  - Computing the correct boundary of the bitmap itself in the caller
    and ensuring that we don't read past it. This may or may not be
    worth it, since in a truncation situation, all bets are off: (is the
    trailer still there and the bitmap entries malformed, or is the
    trailer truncated?). The best we can do is try to read what's there
    as if it's correct data (and protect ourselves when it's obviously
    bogus).

  - Avoid the magic "6" by teaching read_be32() and read_u8() (both of
    which are custom helpers for this function) to check sizes before
    advancing the pointers.

  - Adding more tests in this area. Testing these truncation situations
    are remarkably fragile to even subtle changes in the bitmap
    generation. So, the resulting tests are likely to be quite brittle.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-08 14:48:17 -08:00
Jeff King 2978b00691 rev-list: die when --test-bitmap detects a mismatch
You can use "git rev-list --test-bitmap HEAD" to check that bitmaps
produce the same answer we'd get from a regular traversal. But if we
detect an error, we only print "mismatch", and still exit with a
successful error code.

That makes the uses of --test-bitmap in the test suite (e.g., in t5310)
mostly pointless: even if we saw an error, the tests wouldn't notice.
Let's instead call die(), which will let these tests work as designed,
and alert us if the bitmaps are bogus.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-08 14:48:15 -08:00
Jeff King ec6c7b4367 pack-bitmap: bounds-check size of cache extension
A .bitmap file may have a "name hash cache" extension, which puts a
sequence of uint32_t values (one per object) at the end of the file.
When we see a flag indicating this extension, we blindly subtract the
appropriate number of bytes from our available length. However, if the
.bitmap file is too short, we'll underflow our length variable and wrap
around, thinking we have a very large length. This can lead to reading
out-of-bounds bytes while loading individual ewah bitmaps.

We can fix this by checking the number of available bytes when we parse
the header. The existing "truncated bitmap" test is now split into two
tests: one where we don't have this extension at all (and hence actually
do try to read a truncated ewah bitmap) and one where we realize
up-front that we can't even fit in the cache structure. We'll check
stderr in each case to make sure we hit the error we're expecting.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-08 14:48:15 -08:00
Jeff King ca51090200 pack-bitmap: fix header size check
When we parse a .bitmap header, we first check that we have enough bytes
to make a valid header. We do that based on sizeof(struct
bitmap_disk_header). However, as of 0f4d6cada8 (pack-bitmap: make bitmap
header handling hash agnostic, 2019-02-19), that struct oversizes its
checksum member to GIT_MAX_RAWSZ. That means we need to adjust for the
difference between that constant and the size of the actual hash we're
using. That commit adjusted the code which moves our pointer forward,
but forgot to update the size check.

This meant we were overly strict about the header size (requiring room
for a 32-byte worst-case hash, when sha1 is only 20 bytes). But in
practice it didn't matter because bitmap files tend to have at least 12
bytes of actual data anyway, so it was unlikely for a valid file to be
caught by this.

Let's fix it by pulling the header size into a separate variable and
using it in both spots. That fixes the bug and simplifies the code to make
it harder to have a mismatch like this in the future. It will also come
in handy in the next patch for more bounds checking.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-12-08 14:48:15 -08:00
Jeff King 9639474b6d pack-bitmap: pass object filter to fill-in traversal
Sometimes a bitmap traversal still has to walk some commits manually,
because those commits aren't included in the bitmap packfile (e.g., due
to a push or commit since the last full repack). If we're given an
object filter, we don't pass it down to this traversal. It's not
necessary for correctness because the bitmap code has its own filters to
post-process the bitmap result (which it must, to filter out the objects
that _are_ mentioned in the bitmapped packfile).

And with blob filters, there was no performance reason to pass along
those filters, either. The fill-in traversal could omit them from the
result, but it wouldn't save us any time to do so, since we'd still have
to walk each tree entry to see if it's a blob or not.

But now that we support tree filters, there's opportunity for savings. A
tree:depth=0 filter means we can avoid accessing trees entirely, since
we know we won't them (or any of the subtrees or blobs they point to).
The new test in p5310 shows this off (the "partial bitmap" state is one
where HEAD~100 and its ancestors are all in a bitmapped pack, but
HEAD~100..HEAD are not). Here are the results (run against linux.git):

  Test                                                  HEAD^               HEAD
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [...]
  5310.16: rev-list with tree filter (partial bitmap)   0.19(0.17+0.02)     0.03(0.02+0.01) -84.2%

The absolute number of savings isn't _huge_, but keep in mind that we
only omitted 100 first-parent links (in the version of linux.git here,
that's 894 actual commits). In a more pathological case, we might have a
much larger proportion of non-bitmapped commits. I didn't bother
creating such a case in the perf script because the setup is expensive,
and this is plenty to show the savings as a percentage.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-04 21:57:58 -07:00
Taylor Blau b0a8d4820b pack-bitmap.c: support 'tree:0' filtering
In the previous patch, we made it easy to define other filters that
exclude all objects of a certain type. Use that in order to implement
bitmap-level filtering for the '--filter=tree:<n>' filter when 'n' is
equal to 0.

The general case is not helped by bitmaps, since for values of 'n > 0',
the object filtering machinery requires a full-blown tree traversal in
order to determine the depth of a given tree. Caching this is
non-obvious, too, since the same tree object can have a different depth
depending on the context (e.g., a tree was moved up in the directory
hierarchy between two commits).

But, the 'n = 0' case can be helped, and this patch does so. Running
p5310.11 in this tree and on master with the kernel, we can see that
this case is helped substantially:

  Test                                  master              this tree
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.11: rev-list count with tree:0   10.68(10.39+0.27)   0.06(0.04+0.01) -99.4%

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-04 21:57:58 -07:00
Taylor Blau 856e12c18a pack-bitmap.c: make object filtering functions generic
In 4f3bd5606a (pack-bitmap: implement BLOB_NONE filtering, 2020-02-14),
filtering support for bitmaps was added for the 'LOFC_BLOB_NONE' filter.

In the future, we would like to add support for filters that behave as
if they exclude a certain type of object, for e.g., the tree depth
filter with depth 0.

To prepare for this, make some of the functions used for filtering more
generic, such as 'find_tip_blobs' and 'filter_bitmap_blob_none' so that
they can work over arbitrary object types.

To that end, create 'find_tip_objects' and
'filter_bitmap_exclude_type', and redefine the aforementioned functions
in terms of those.

Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-04 21:57:58 -07:00
Junio C Hamano e8e71848ea Merge branch 'jk/nth-packed-object-id'
Code cleanup to use "struct object_id" more by replacing use of
"char *sha1"

* jk/nth-packed-object-id:
  packfile: drop nth_packed_object_sha1()
  packed_object_info(): use object_id internally for delta base
  packed_object_info(): use object_id for returning delta base
  pack-check: push oid lookup into loop
  pack-check: convert "internal error" die to a BUG()
  pack-bitmap: use object_id when loading on-disk bitmaps
  pack-objects: use object_id struct in pack-reuse code
  pack-objects: convert oe_set_delta_ext() to use object_id
  pack-objects: read delta base oid into object_id struct
  nth_packed_object_oid(): use customary integer return
2020-03-05 10:43:03 -08:00
Junio C Hamano 0df82d99da Merge branch 'jk/object-filter-with-bitmap'
The object reachability bitmap machinery and the partial cloning
machinery were not prepared to work well together, because some
object-filtering criteria that partial clones use inherently rely
on object traversal, but the bitmap machinery is an optimization
to bypass that object traversal.  There however are some cases
where they can work together, and they were taught about them.

* jk/object-filter-with-bitmap:
  rev-list --count: comment on the use of count_right++
  pack-objects: support filters with bitmaps
  pack-bitmap: implement BLOB_LIMIT filtering
  pack-bitmap: implement BLOB_NONE filtering
  bitmap: add bitmap_unset() function
  rev-list: use bitmap filters for traversal
  pack-bitmap: basic noop bitmap filter infrastructure
  rev-list: allow commit-only bitmap traversals
  t5310: factor out bitmap traversal comparison
  rev-list: allow bitmaps when counting objects
  rev-list: make --count work with --objects
  rev-list: factor out bitmap-optimized routines
  pack-bitmap: refuse to do a bitmap traversal with pathspecs
  rev-list: fallback to non-bitmap traversal when filtering
  pack-bitmap: fix leak of haves/wants object lists
  pack-bitmap: factor out type iterator initialization
2020-03-02 15:07:18 -08:00
Jeff King 500e4f2366 pack-bitmap: use object_id when loading on-disk bitmaps
A pack bitmap file contains the index position of the commit for each
bitmap, which we then translate into an object id via
nth_packed_object_sha1(). In preparation for that function going away,
we can switch to the more type-safe nth_packed_object_id().

Note that even though the result ends up in an object_id this does incur
an extra copy of the hash (into our temporary object_id, and then into
the final malloc'd stored_bitmap struct). This shouldn't make any
measurable difference. If it did, we could avoid this copy _and_ the
copy of the rest of the items by allocating the stored_bitmap struct
beforehand and reading directly into it from the bitmap file. Or better
still, if this is a bottleneck, we could introduce an on-disk index to
the bitmap file so we don't have to read every single entry to use just
one of them. So it's not worth worrying about micro-optimizing out this
one hash copy.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-24 12:55:53 -08:00
Jeff King 0763671b8e nth_packed_object_oid(): use customary integer return
Our nth_packed_object_sha1() function returns NULL for error. So when we
wrapped it with nth_packed_object_oid(), we kept the same semantics. But
it's a bit funny, because the caller actually passes in an out
parameter, and the pointer we return is just that same struct they
passed to us (or NULL).

It's not too terrible, but it does make the interface a little
non-idiomatic. Let's switch to our usual "0 for success, negative for
error" return value. Most callers either don't check it, or are
trivially converted. The one that requires the biggest change is
actually improved, as we can ditch an extra aliased pointer variable.

Since we are changing the interface in a subtle way that the compiler
wouldn't catch, let's also change the name to catch any topics in
flight. We can drop the 'o' and make it nth_packed_object_id(). That's
slightly shorter, but also less redundant since the 'o' stands for
"object" already.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-24 12:55:42 -08:00
Junio C Hamano a14aebeac3 Merge branch 'jk/packfile-reuse-cleanup'
The way "git pack-objects" reuses objects stored in existing pack
to generate its result has been improved.

* jk/packfile-reuse-cleanup:
  pack-bitmap: don't rely on bitmap_git->reuse_objects
  pack-objects: add checks for duplicate objects
  pack-objects: improve partial packfile reuse
  builtin/pack-objects: introduce obj_is_packed()
  pack-objects: introduce pack.allowPackReuse
  csum-file: introduce hashfile_total()
  pack-bitmap: simplify bitmap_has_oid_in_uninteresting()
  pack-bitmap: uninteresting oid can be outside bitmapped packfile
  pack-bitmap: introduce bitmap_walk_contains()
  ewah/bitmap: introduce bitmap_word_alloc()
  packfile: expose get_delta_base()
  builtin/pack-objects: report reused packfile objects
2020-02-14 12:54:19 -08:00
Jeff King 84243da129 pack-bitmap: implement BLOB_LIMIT filtering
Just as the previous commit implemented BLOB_NONE, we can support
BLOB_LIMIT filters by looking at the sizes of any blobs in the result
and unsetting their bits as appropriate. This is slightly more expensive
than BLOB_NONE, but still produces a noticeable speedup (these results
are on git.git):

  Test                                         HEAD~2            HEAD
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.9:  rev-list count with blob:none       1.80(1.77+0.02)   0.22(0.20+0.02) -87.8%
  5310.10: rev-list count with blob:limit=1k   1.99(1.96+0.03)   0.29(0.25+0.03) -85.4%

The implementation is similar to the BLOB_NONE one, with the exception
that we have to go object-by-object while walking the blob-type bitmap
(since we can't mask out the matches, but must look up the size
individually for each blob). The trick with using ctz64() is taken from
show_objects_for_type(), which likewise needs to find individual bits
(but wants to quickly skip over big chunks without blobs).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-14 10:46:22 -08:00
Jeff King 4f3bd5606a pack-bitmap: implement BLOB_NONE filtering
We can easily support BLOB_NONE filters with bitmaps. Since we know the
types of all of the objects, we just need to clear the result bits of
any blobs.

Note two subtleties in the implementation (which I also called out in
comments):

  - we have to include any blobs that were specifically asked for (and
    not reached through graph traversal) to match the non-bitmap version

  - we have to handle in-pack and "ext_index" objects separately.
    Arguably prepare_bitmap_walk() could be adding these ext_index
    objects to the type bitmaps. But it doesn't for now, so let's match
    the rest of the bitmap code here (it probably wouldn't be an
    efficiency improvement to do so since the cost of extending those
    bitmaps is about the same as our loop here, but it might make the
    code a bit simpler).

Here are perf results for the new test on git.git:

  Test                                    HEAD^             HEAD
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.9: rev-list count with blob:none   1.67(1.62+0.05)   0.22(0.21+0.02) -86.8%

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-14 10:46:22 -08:00
Jeff King 6663ae0a08 pack-bitmap: basic noop bitmap filter infrastructure
Currently you can't use object filters with bitmaps, but we plan to
support at least some filters with bitmaps. Let's introduce some
infrastructure that will help us do that:

  - prepare_bitmap_walk() now accepts a list_objects_filter_options
    parameter (which can be NULL for no filtering; all the current
    callers pass this)

  - we'll bail early if the filter is incompatible with bitmaps (just as
    we would if there were no bitmaps at all). Currently all filters are
    incompatible.

  - we'll filter the resulting bitmap; since there are no supported
    filters yet, this is always a noop.

There should be no behavior change yet, but we'll support some actual
filters in a future patch.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-14 10:46:22 -08:00
Jeff King 4eb707ebd6 rev-list: allow commit-only bitmap traversals
Ever since we added reachability bitmap support, we've been able to use
it with rev-list to get the full list of objects, like:

  git rev-list --objects --use-bitmap-index --all

But you can't do so without --objects, since we weren't ready to just
show the commits. However, the internals of the bitmap code are mostly
ready for this: they avoid opening up trees when walking to fill in the
bitmaps. We just need to actually pass in the rev_info to
traverse_bitmap_commit_list() so it knows which types to bother
triggering our callback for.

For completeness, the perf test now covers both the existing --objects
case, as well as the new commits-only behavior (the objects one got way
faster when we introduced bitmaps, but obviously isn't improved now).

Here are numbers for linux.git:

  Test                         HEAD^               HEAD
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.7: rev-list (commits)   8.29(8.10+0.19)       1.76(1.72+0.04) -78.8%
  5310.8: rev-list (objects)   8.06(7.94+0.12)       8.14(7.94+0.13) +1.0%

That run was cheating a little, as I didn't have any commit-graph in the
repository, and we'd built it by default these days when running git-gc.
Here are numbers with a commit-graph:

  Test                         HEAD^               HEAD
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
  5310.7: rev-list (commits)   0.70(0.58+0.12)     0.51(0.46+0.04) -27.1%
  5310.8: rev-list (objects)   6.20(6.09+0.10)     6.27(6.16+0.11) +1.1%

Still an improvement, but a lot less impressive.

We could have the perf script remove any commit-graph to show the
out-sized effect, but it probably makes sense to leave it in what would
be a more typical setup.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-14 10:46:22 -08:00
Jeff King d90fe06ea7 pack-bitmap: refuse to do a bitmap traversal with pathspecs
rev-list has refused to use bitmaps with pathspec limiting since
c8a70d3509 (rev-list: disable --use-bitmap-index when pruning commits,
2015-07-01). But this is true not just for rev-list, but for anyone who
calls prepare_bitmap_walk(); the code isn't equipped to handle this
case.  We never noticed because the only other callers would never pass
a pathspec limiter.

But let's push the check down into prepare_bitmap_walk() anyway. That's
a more logical place for it to live, as callers shouldn't need to know
the details (and must be prepared to fall back to a regular traversal
anyway, since there might not be bitmaps in the repository).

It would also prepare us for a day where this case _is_ handled, but
that's pretty unlikely. E.g., we could use bitmaps to generate the set
of commits, and then diff each commit to see if it matches the pathspec.
That would be slightly faster than a naive traversal that actually walks
the commits. But you'd probably do better still to make use of the newer
commit-graph feature to make walking the commits very cheap.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-14 10:46:22 -08:00
Jeff King acac50dd8c pack-bitmap: fix leak of haves/wants object lists
When we do a bitmap-aware revision traversal, we create an object_list
for each of the "haves" and "wants" tips. After creating the result
bitmaps these are no longer needed or used, but we never free the list
memory.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-13 09:08:58 -08:00
Jeff King 551cf8b655 pack-bitmap: factor out type iterator initialization
When count_object_type() wants to iterate over the bitmap of all objects
of a certain type, we have to pair up OBJ_COMMIT with bitmap->commits,
and so forth. Since we're about to add more code to iterate over these
bitmaps, let's pull the initialization into its own function.

We can also use this to simplify traverse_bitmap_commit_list(). It
accomplishes the same thing by manually passing the object type and the
bitmap to show_objects_for_type(), but using our helper we just need the
object type.

Note there's one small code change here: previously we'd simply return
zero when counting an unknown object type, and now we'll BUG(). This
shouldn't matter in practice, as all of the callers pass in only usual
commit/tree/blob/tag types.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-13 09:08:58 -08:00
Jeff King d2ea031046 pack-bitmap: don't rely on bitmap_git->reuse_objects
We no longer compute bitmap_git->reuse_objects, so we
cannot rely on it anymore to terminate the loop early;
we have to iterate to the end.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-23 10:51:50 -08:00
Jeff King bb514de356 pack-objects: improve partial packfile reuse
The old code to reuse deltas from an existing packfile
just tried to dump a whole segment of the pack verbatim.
That's faster than the traditional way of actually adding
objects to the packing list, but it didn't kick in very
often. This new code is really going for a middle ground:
do _some_ per-object work, but way less than we'd
traditionally do.

The general strategy of the new code is to make a bitmap
of objects from the packfile we'll include, and then
iterate over it, writing out each object exactly as it is
in our on-disk pack, but _not_ adding it to our packlist
(which costs memory, and increases the search space for
deltas).

One complication is that if we're omitting some objects,
we can't set a delta against a base that we're not
sending. So we have to check each object in
try_partial_reuse() to make sure we have its delta.

About performance, in the worst case we might have
interleaved objects that we are sending or not sending,
and we'd have as many chunks as objects. But in practice
we send big chunks.

For instance, packing torvalds/linux on GitHub servers
now reused 6.5M objects, but only needed ~50k chunks.

Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-23 10:51:50 -08:00
Jeff King 8ebf529661 pack-bitmap: simplify bitmap_has_oid_in_uninteresting()
Let's refactor bitmap_has_oid_in_uninteresting() using
bitmap_walk_contains().

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-23 10:51:50 -08:00
Jeff King 59b2829ec5 pack-bitmap: uninteresting oid can be outside bitmapped packfile
bitmap_has_oid_in_uninteresting() only used bitmap_position_packfile(),
not bitmap_position(). So it wouldn't find objects which weren't in the
bitmapped packfile (i.e., ones where we extended the bitmap to handle
loose objects, or objects in other packs).

As we could reuse a delta against such an object it is suboptimal not
to use bitmap_position(), so let's use it instead of
bitmap_position_packfile().

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-23 10:51:50 -08:00
Jeff King 40d18ff8c6 pack-bitmap: introduce bitmap_walk_contains()
We will use this helper function in a following commit to
tell us if an object is packed.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-01-23 10:51:50 -08:00
Junio C Hamano d8ce144e11 Merge branch 'jk/misc-uninitialized-fixes'
Various fixes to codepaths gcc 9 had trouble following dataflow.

* jk/misc-uninitialized-fixes:
  pack-objects: drop packlist index_pos optimization
  test-read-cache: drop namelen variable
  diff-delta: set size out-parameter to 0 for NULL delta
  bulk-checkin: zero-initialize hashfile_checkpoint
  pack-objects: use object_id in packlist_alloc()
  git-am: handle missing "author" when parsing commit
2019-09-30 13:19:30 +09:00
Jeff King 3a37876b5d pack-objects: drop packlist index_pos optimization
Once upon a time, the code to add an object to our packing list in
pack-objects all lived in a single function. It computed the position
within the hash table once, then used it to check if the object was
already present, and if not, to add it.

Later, in 2834bc27c1 (pack-objects: refactor the packing list,
2013-10-24), this was split into two functions: packlist_find() and
packlist_alloc(). We ended up with an "index_pos" variable that gets
passed through several functions to make it from one to the other.

The resulting code is rather confusing to follow. The "index_pos"
variable is sometimes undefined, if we don't yet have a hash table. This
works out in practice because in that case packlist_alloc() won't use it
at all, since it will have to create/grow the hash table. But it's hard
to verify that, and it does cause gcc 9.2.1's -Wmaybe-uninitialized to
complain when compiled with "-flto -O3" (rightfully, since we do pass
the uninitialized value as a function parameter, even if nobody ends up
using it).

All of this is to save computing the hash index again when we're
inserting into the hash table, which I found doesn't make a measurable
difference in the program runtime (which is not surprising, since we're
doing all kinds of other heavyweight things for each object).

Let's just drop this index_pos variable entirely, simplifying the code
(and pleasing the compiler).

We might be better still refactoring this custom hash table to use one
of our existing implementations (an oidmap, or a kh_oid_map). I stopped
short of that here, but this would be the likely first step towards that
anyway.

Reported-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-06 11:03:42 -07:00
René Scharfe dad3f0607b tag: factor out get_tagged_oid()
Add a function for accessing the ID of the object referenced by a tag
safely, i.e. without causing a segfault when encountering a broken tag
where ->tagged is NULL.

Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-09-05 14:10:18 -07:00
Jeff King d2bc62b1fa pack-bitmap: convert khash_sha1 maps into kh_oid_map
All of the users of our khash_sha1 maps actually have a "struct
object_id". Let's use the more descriptive type.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-06-20 10:35:05 -07:00