The patch-id computation did not ignore the "incomplete last line"
marker like whitespaces.
* rs/patch-id-with-incomplete-line:
patch-id: ignore newline at end of file in diff_flush_patch_id()
"ls-files -o" mishandled the top-level directory of another git
working tree that hangs in the current git working tree.
* en/dir-nonbare-embedded:
dir: avoid prematurely marking nonbare repositories as matches
t3000: fix some test description typos
The "--batch-size" option of "git multi-pack-index repack" command
is now used to specify that very small packfiles are collected into
one until the total size roughly exceeds it.
* ds/midx-repack-to-batch-size:
multi-pack-index: repack batches below --batch-size
The purpose of "git init --separate-git-dir" is to initialize a
new project with the repository separate from the working tree,
or, in the case of an existing project, to move the repository
(the .git/ directory) out of the working tree. It does not make
sense to use --separate-git-dir with a bare repository for which
there is no working tree, so disallow its use with bare
repositories.
* es/init-no-separate-git-dir-in-bare:
init: disallow --separate-git-dir with bare repository
midx and commit-graph files now use the byte defined in their file
format specification for identifying the hash function used for
object names.
* ds/sha256-leftover-bits:
multi-pack-index: use hash version byte
commit-graph: use the "hash version" byte
t/README: document GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH
A few end-user facing messages have been updated to be
hash-algorithm agnostic.
* jc/object-names-are-not-sha-1:
messages: avoid SHA-1 in end-user facing messages
The regexp to identify the function boundary for FORTRAN programs
has been updated.
* pb/userdiff-fortran-update:
userdiff: improve Fortran xfuncname regex
userdiff: add tests for Fortran xfuncname regex
When given more than one target line ranges, "git blame -La,b
-Lc,d" was over-eager to coalesce groups of original lines and
showed incorrect results, which has been corrected.
* jk/blame-coalesce-fix:
blame: only coalesce lines that are adjacent in result
t8003: factor setup out of coalesce test
t8003: check output of coalesced blame
Ring buffer with size 4 used for bin-hex translation resulted in a
wrong object name in the sequencer's todo output, which has been
corrected.
* ak/sequencer-fix-find-uniq-abbrev:
rebase -i: fix possibly wrong onto hash in todo
The commit labels used to explain each side of conflicted hunks
placed by the sequencer machinery have been made more readable by
humans.
* en/sequencer-merge-labels:
sequencer: avoid garbled merge machinery messages due to commit labels
Updates to "git merge" tests, in preparation for a new merge
strategy backend.
* en/merge-tests:
t6425: be more flexible with rename/delete conflict messages
t642[23]: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving pair renames
t6422, t6426: be more flexible for add/add conflicts involving renames
t6423: add an explanation about why one of the tests does not pass
t6416, t6423: clarify some comments and fix some typos
t6422: fix multiple errors with the mod6 test expectations
t6423: fix test setup for a couple tests
t6416, t6422: fix incorrect untracked file count
t6422: fix bad check against missing file
t6418: tighten delete/normalize conflict testcase
Collect merge-related tests to t64xx
Whitespace is ignored when calculating patch IDs. This is done by
removing all whitespace from diff lines before hashing them, including
a newline at the end of a file. If that newline is missing, however,
diff reports that fact in a separate line containing "\ No newline at
end of file\n", and this marker is hashed like a context line.
This goes against our goal of making patch IDs independent of
whitespace. Use the same heuristic that 2485eab55c (git-patch-id: do
not trip over "no newline" markers, 2011-02-17) added to git patch-id
instead and skip diff lines that start with a backslash and a space
and are longer than twelve characters.
Reported-by: Tilman Vogel <tilman.vogel@web.de>
Initial-test-by: Tilman Vogel <tilman.vogel@web.de>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If you run fetch but record the result in remote-tracking branches,
and either if you do nothing with the fetched refs (e.g. you are
merely mirroring) or if you always work from the remote-tracking
refs (e.g. you fetch and then merge origin/branchname separately),
you can get away with having no FETCH_HEAD at all.
Teach "git fetch" a command line option "--[no-]write-fetch-head".
The default is to write FETCH_HEAD, and the option is primarily
meant to be used with the "--no-" prefix to override this default,
because there is no matching fetch.writeFetchHEAD configuration
variable to flip the default to off (in which case, the positive
form may become necessary to defeat it).
Note that under "--dry-run" mode, FETCH_HEAD is never written;
otherwise you'd see list of objects in the file that you do not
actually have. Passing `--write-fetch-head` does not force `git
fetch` to write the file.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, to countermand the implicit "-m" option when the
"--first-parent" option is used with "git log", we added the
"--[no-]diff-merges" option in the jk/log-fp-implies-m topic. To
leave the door open to allow the "--diff-merges" option to take
values that instructs how patches for merge commits should be
computed (e.g. "cc"? "-p against first parent?"), redefine
"--diff-merges" to take non-optional value, and implement "off"
that means the same thing as "--no-diff-merges".
* so/log-diff-merges-opt:
t/t4013: add test for --diff-merges=off
doc/git-log: describe --diff-merges=off
revision: change "--diff-merges" option to require parameter
"git log --first-parent -p" showed patches only for single-parent
commits on the first-parent chain; the "--first-parent" option has
been made to imply "-m". Use "--no-diff-merges" to restore the
previous behaviour to omit patches for merge commits.
* jk/log-fp-implies-m:
doc/git-log: clarify handling of merge commit diffs
doc/git-log: move "-t" into diff-options list
doc/git-log: drop "-r" diff option
doc/git-log: move "Diff Formatting" from rev-list-options
log: enable "-m" automatically with "--first-parent"
revision: add "--no-diff-merges" option to counteract "-m"
log: drop "--cc implies -m" logic
Recent versions of "git diff-files" shows a diff between the index
and the working tree for "intent-to-add" paths as a "new file"
patch; "git apply --cached" should be able to take "git diff-files"
and should act as an equivalent to "git add" for the path, but the
command failed to do so for such a path.
* rp/apply-cached-with-i-t-a:
t4140: test apply with i-t-a paths
apply: make i-t-a entries never match worktree
apply: allow "new file" patches on i-t-a entries
"git bisect" learns the "--first-parent" option to find the first
breakage along the first-parent chain.
* al/bisect-first-parent:
bisect: combine args passed to find_bisection()
bisect: introduce first-parent flag
cmd_bisect__helper: defer parsing no-checkout flag
rev-list: allow bisect and first-parent flags
t6030: modernize "git bisect run" tests
Further preliminary change to refs API.
* hn/reftable-prep-part-2:
Make HEAD a PSEUDOREF rather than PER_WORKTREE.
Modify pseudo refs through ref backend storage
t1400: use git rev-parse for testing PSEUDOREF existence
Stop when "sendmail.*" configuration variables are defined, which
could be a mistaken attempt to define "sendemail.*" variables.
* dd/send-email-config:
git-send-email: die if sendmail.* config is set
The logic to find the ref transaction hook script attempted to
cache the path to the found hook without realizing that it needed
to keep a copied value, as the API it used returned a transitory
buffer space. This has been corrected.
* ps/ref-transaction-hook:
t1416: avoid hard-coded sha1 ids
refs: fix interleaving hook calls with reference-transaction hook
Similar to the commit-graph format, the multi-pack-index format has a
byte in the header intended to track the hash version used to write the
file. This allows one to interpret the hash length without having the
context of the repository config specifying the hash length. This was
not modified as part of the SHA-256 work because the hash length was
automatically up-shifted due to that config.
Since we have this byte available, we can make the file formats more
obviously incompatible instead of relying on other context from the
repository.
Add a new oid_version() method in midx.c similar to the one in
commit-graph.c. This is specifically made separate from that
implementation to avoid artificially linking the formats.
The test impact requires a few more things than the corresponding change
in the commit-graph format. Specifically, 'test-tool read-midx' was not
writing anything about this header value to output. Since the value
available in 'struct multi_pack_index' is hash_len instead of a version
value, we output "20" or "32" instead of "1" or "2".
Since we want a user to not have their Git commands fail if their
multi-pack-index has the incorrect hash version compared to the
repository's hash version, we relax the die() to an error() in
load_multi_pack_index(). This has some effect on 'git multi-pack-index
verify' as we need to check that a failed parse of a file that exists is
actually a verify error. For that test that checks the hash version
matches, we change the corrupted byte from "2" to "3" to ensure the test
fails for both hash algorithms.
Helped-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit-graph format reserved a byte among the header of the file to
store a "hash version". During the SHA-256 work, this was not modified
because file formats are not necessarily intended to work across hash
versions. If a repository has SHA-256 as its hash algorithm, it
automatically up-shifts the lengths of object names in all necessary
formats.
However, since we have this byte available for adjusting the version, we
can make the file formats more obviously incompatible instead of relying
on other context from the repository.
Update the oid_version() method in commit-graph.c to add a new value, 2,
for sha-256. This automatically writes the new value in a SHA-256
repository _and_ verifies the value is correct. This is a breaking
change relative to the current 'master' branch since 092b677 (Merge
branch 'bc/sha-256-cvs-svn-updates', 2020-08-13) but it is not breaking
relative to any released version of Git.
The test impact is relatively minor: the output of 'test-tool
read-graph' lists the header information, so those instances of '1' need
to be replaced with a variable determined by GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH. A
more careful test is added that specifically creates a repository of
each type then swaps the commit-graph files. The important value here is
that the "git log" command succeeds while writing a message to stderr.
Helped-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
sequencer's get_message() exists to provide good labels on conflict
hunks; see commits
d68565402a ("revert: clarify label on conflict hunks", 2010-03-20)
bf975d379d ("cherry-pick, revert: add a label for ancestor", 2010-03-20)
043a4492b3 ("sequencer: factor code out of revert builtin", 2012-01-11).
for background on this function. These labels are of the form
<commitID>... <commit summary>
or
parent of <commitID>... <commit summary>
These labels are then passed as branch names to the merge machinery.
However, these labels, as formatted, often also serve to confuse. For
example, if we have a rename involved in a content merge, then it
results in text such as the following:
<<<<<<<< HEAD:foo.c
int j;
========
int counter;
>>>>>>>> b01dface... Removed unnecessary stuff:bar.c
Or in various conflict messages, it can make it very difficult to read:
CONFLICT (rename/delete): foo.c deleted in b01dface... Removed
unnecessary stuff and renamed in HEAD. Version HEAD of foo.c left
in tree.
CONFLICT (file location): dir1/foo.c added in b01dface... Removed
unnecessary stuff inside a directory that was renamed in HEAD,
suggesting it should perhaps be moved to dir2/foo.c.
Make a minor change to remove the ellipses and add parentheses around
the commit summary; this makes all three examples much easier to read:
<<<<<<<< HEAD:foo.c
int j;
========
int counter;
>>>>>>>> b01dface (Removed unnecessary stuff):bar.c
CONFLICT (rename/delete): foo.c deleted in b01dface (Removed
unnecessary stuff) and renamed in HEAD. Version HEAD of foo.c left
in tree.
CONFLICT (file location): dir1/foo.c added in b01dface (Removed
unnecessary stuff) inside a directory that was renamed in HEAD,
suggesting it should perhaps be moved to dir2/foo.c.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are still a handful mentions of SHA-1 when we meant the
(hexadecimal) object names in end-user facing messages. Rewrite
them.
I was hoping that this can mostly be s/SHA-1/object name/, but
a few messages needed rephrasing to keep the result readable.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A new helper function has_object() has been introduced to make it
easier to mark object existence checks that do and don't want to
trigger lazy fetches, and a few such checks are converted using it.
* jt/has_object:
fsck: do not lazy fetch known non-promisor object
pack-objects: no fetch when allow-{any,promisor}
apply: do not lazy fetch when applying binary
sha1-file: introduce no-lazy-fetch has_object()
'todo_list_write_to_file' may overwrite the static buffer, originating
from 'find_unique_abbrev', that was used to store the short commit hash
'c' for "# Rebase a..b onto c" message in the todo editor. This is
because the buffer that is returned from 'find_unique_abbrev' is valid
until 4 more calls to `find_unique_abbrev` are made.
As 'todo_list_write_to_file' calls 'find_unique_abbrev' for each rebased
commit, the hash for 'c' is overwritten if there are 4 or more commits
in the rebase. This behavior has been broken since its introduction.
Fix by storing the short onto commit hash in a different buffer that
remains valid, before calling 'todo_list_write_to_file'.
Found-by: Jussi Keränen <jussike@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Antti Keränen <detegr@rbx.email>
Acked-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The third part of the Fortran xfuncname regex wants to match the
beginning of a subroutine or function, so it allows for all characters
except `'`, `"` or whitespace before the keyword 'function' or
'subroutine'. This is meant to match the 'recursive', 'elemental' or
'pure' keywords, as well as function return types, and to prevent
matches inside strings.
However, the negated set does not contain the `!` comment character,
so a line with an end-of-line comment containing the keyword 'function' or
'subroutine' followed by another word is mistakenly chosen as a hunk header.
Improve the regex by adding `!` to the negated set.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The Fortran userdiff patterns, introduced in 909a5494f8 (userdiff.c: add
builtin fortran regex patterns, 2010-09-10), predate the test
infrastructure for xfuncname patterns, introduced in bfa7d01413 (t4018:
an infrastructure to test hunk headers, 2014-03-21).
Add tests for the Fortran xfuncname patterns. The test
't/t4018/fortran-comment-keyword' documents a shortcoming of the regex
that is fixed in a subsequent commit.
While at it, add descriptive comments for the different parts of the
regex.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After blame has finished but before we produce any output, we coalesce
groups of lines that were adjacent in the original suspect (which may
have been split apart by lines in intermediate commits which went away).
However, this can cause incorrect output if the lines are not also
adjacent in the result. For instance, the case in t8003 has:
ABC
DEF
which becomes
ABC
SPLIT
DEF
Blaming only lines 1 and 3 in the result yields two blame groups (one
for each line) that were adjacent in the original. That's enough for us
to coalesce them into a single group, but that loses information: our
output routines assume they're adjacent in the result as well, and we
output:
<oid> 1) ABC
<oid> 2) SPLIT
This is nonsense for two reasons:
- we were asked about line 3, not line 2; we should not output the
SPLIT line at all
- commit <oid> did not touch the SPLIT line at all! We found the
correct blame for line 3, but the bug is actually in the output
stage, which is showing the wrong line number and content from the
final file.
We can fix this by only coalescing when both the suspect and result
lines are adjacent. That fixes this bug, but keeps coalescing in cases
where want it (e.g., the existing test in t8003 where SPLIT goes away,
and the lines really are adjacent in the result).
Reported-by: Nuthan Munaiah <nm6061@rit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for adding more tests of blame's coalesce code, let's
split the setup out from the first test, and give each of the commits
a more meaningful name:
- $orig for the original source that added the lines
- $split for the version where they are split apart
- $final for the final version that re-joins them
That's not strictly necessary, but makes the follow-on tests less
brittle than relying on HEAD^, etc, to name the commits.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit f0cbe742f4 (blame: add a test to cover blame_coalesce(),
2019-06-20) added a test case where blame can usefully coalesce two
groups of lines. But since it relies on the normal blame output, it only
exercises the code and can't tell whether the lines were actually
joined into a single group.
However, by using --porcelain output, we can see how git-blame considers
the groupings (and likewise how the coalescing might have a real
user-visible impact for a tool that uses the porcelain-output
groupings). This lets us confirm that we are indeed coalescing correctly
(and the fact that this test case requires coalescing can be verified by
dropping the call to blame_coalesce(), causing the test to fail).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Nonbare repositories are special directories. Unlike normal directories
that we might recurse into to list the files they contain, nonbare
repositories must themselves match and then we always report only on the
nonbare repository directory itself and not on any of its contents.
Separately, when traversing directories to try to find untracked or
excluded files, we often think in terms of paths either matching the
specified pathspec, or not matching them. However, there is a special
value that do_match_pathspec() uses named
MATCHED_RECURSIVELY_LEADING_PATHSPEC which means "this directory does
not match any pathspec BUT it is possible a file or directory underneath
it does." That special value prevents us from prematurely thinking that
some directory and everything under it is irrelevant, but also allows us
to differentiate from "this is a match".
The combination of these two special cases was previously uncovered.
Add a test to the testsuite to cover it, and make sure that we return a
nonbare repository as a non-match if the best match it got was
MATCHED_RECURSIVELY_LEADING_PATHSPEC.
Reported-by: christian w <usebees@gmail.com>
Simplified-testcase-and-bisection-by: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is no such flag as --o; it is either --others or -o.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The component to respond to "git fetch" request is made more
configurable to selectively allow or reject object filtering
specification used for partial cloning.
* tb/upload-pack-filters:
t5616: use test_i18ngrep for upload-pack errors
upload-pack.c: introduce 'uploadpackfilter.tree.maxDepth'
upload-pack.c: allow banning certain object filter(s)
list_objects_filter_options: introduce 'list_object_filter_config_name'
The final leg of SHA-256 transition.
* bc/sha-256-part-3: (39 commits)
t: remove test_oid_init in tests
docs: add documentation for extensions.objectFormat
ci: run tests with SHA-256
t: make SHA1 prerequisite depend on default hash
t: allow testing different hash algorithms via environment
t: add test_oid option to select hash algorithm
repository: enable SHA-256 support by default
setup: add support for reading extensions.objectformat
bundle: add new version for use with SHA-256
builtin/verify-pack: implement an --object-format option
http-fetch: set up git directory before parsing pack hashes
t0410: mark test with SHA1 prerequisite
t5308: make test work with SHA-256
t9700: make hash size independent
t9500: ensure that algorithm info is preserved in config
t9350: make hash size independent
t9301: make hash size independent
t9300: use $ZERO_OID instead of hard-coded object ID
t9300: abstract away SHA-1-specific constants
t8011: make hash size independent
...
The test added by e5256c82e5 (refs: fix interleaving hook calls with
reference-transaction hook, 2020-08-07) uses hard-coded sha1 object ids
in its expected output. This causes it to fail when run with
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_HASH=sha256.
Let's make use of the oid variables we define earlier, as the rest of
the nearby tests do.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --batch-size=<size> option of 'git multi-pack-index repack' is
intended to limit the amount of work done by the repack. In the case of
a large repository, this command should repack a number of small
pack-files but leave the large pack-files alone. Most often, the
repository has one large pack-file from a 'git clone' operation and
number of smaller pack-files from incremental 'git fetch' operations.
The issue with '--batch-size' is that it also _prevents_ the repack from
happening if the expected size of the resulting pack-file is too small.
This was intended as a way to avoid frequent churn of small pack-files,
but it has mostly caused confusion when a repository is of "medium"
size. That is, not enormous like the Windows OS repository, but also not
so small that this incremental repack isn't valuable.
The solution presented here is to collect pack-files for repack if their
expected size is smaller than the batch-size parameter until either the
total expected size exceeds the batch-size or all pack-files are
considered. If there are at least two pack-files, then these are
combined to a new pack-file whose size should not be too much larger
than the batch-size.
This new strategy should succeed in keeping the number of pack-files
small in these "medium" size repositories. The concern about churn is
likely not interesting, as the real control over that is the frequency
in which the repack command is run.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t6425 was very picky about the exact output message produced by a
rename/delete conflict, in a way that just scratches the surface of the
mess that was built into merge-recursive. The idea was that it would
try to find the possible combinations of different conflict types, and
when more than one was present for one path, it would try to provide a
combined message that covered all the cases.
There's a lot to unravel here...
First, there's a basic conflict type known as modify/delete, which is a
content conflict. It occurs when one side deletes a file, but the other
modifies it.
There is also a path conflict known as a rename/delete. This occurs
when one side deletes a path, and the other renames it. This is not a
content conflict, it is a path conflict. It will often occur in
combination with a content conflict, though, namely a modify/delete. As
such, these two were often combined.
Another type of conflict that can exist is a directory/file conflict.
For example, one side adds a new file at some path, and the other side
of history adds a directory at the same path. The path that was "added"
could have been put there by a rename, though. Thus, we have the
possibility of a single path being affected by a modify/delete, a
rename/delete, and a directory/file conflict.
In part, this was a natural by-product of merge-recursive's design.
Since it was doing a four way merge with the contents of the working
tree being the fourth factor it had to consider, it had working tree
handling spread all over the code. It also had directory/file conflict
handling spread everywhere through all the other types of conflicts.
And our testsuite has a huge number of directory/file conflict tests
because trying to get them right required modifying so many different
codepaths. A natural outgrowth of this kind of structure is conflict
messages that combine all the different types that the current codepath
is considering.
However, if we want to make the different conflict types orthogonal and
avoid repeating ourselves and getting very brittle code, then we need to
split the messages from these different conflict types apart. Besides,
trying to determine all possible permutations is a _royal_ mess. The
code to handle the rename/delete/directory/file conflict output is
already somewhat hard to parse, and is somewhat brittle. But if we
really wanted to go that route, then we'd have to have special handling
for the following types of combinations:
* rename/add/delete:
on side of history that didn't rename the given file, remove the file
instead and place an unrelated file in the way of the rename
* rename/rename(2to1)/mode conflict/delete/delete:
two different files, one executable and the other not, are renamed
to the same location, each side deletes the source file that the
other side renames
* rename/rename(1to2)/add/add:
file renamed differently on each side of history, with each side
placing an unrelated file in the way of the other
* rename/rename(1to2)/content conflict/file location/(D/F)/(D/F)/:
both sides modify a file in conflicting way, both rename that file
but to different paths, one side renames the directory which the
other side had renamed that file into causing it to possibly need a
transitive rename, and each side puts a directory in the way of the
other's path.
Let's back away from this path of insanity, and allow the different
types of conflicts to be handled by separate pieces of non-repeated code
by allowing the conflict messages to be split into their separate types.
(If multiple conflict types affect a single path, the conflict messages
can be printed sequentially.) Start this path with a simple change:
modify this test to be more flexible and accept the output either merge
backend (recursive or the new ort) will produce.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Much like the last commit accepted 'add/add' and 'rename/add'
interchangably, we also want to do the same for 'add/add' and
'rename/rename'. This also allows us to avoid the ambiguity in meaning
with 'rename/rename' (is it two separate files renamed to the same
location, or one file renamed on both sides but differently)?
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive treats an add/add conflict where one of the adds came
from a rename as a separate 'rename/add' type of conflict. However, if
there is not content conflict after the content merge(s), then the file
is not considered to be conflicted. That suggests the conflict type is
really just add/add. Other merge engines might choose to print messages
to the console that just refer to these as add/add conflicts; accept
both types of output.
Note: it could help to notify users if the three-way content merge of
the rename had content conflicts, because when we then go to two-way
merge THAT with the conflicting add we can get nested conflict markers.
merge-recursive, unfortunately, doesn't do that, but other merge engines
could.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I had long since forgotten the idea behind this test and why it failed,
and took a little while to figure it out. To prevent others from having
to spend a similar time on it, add an explanation in the comments.
However, the reasoning in the explanation makes me question why I
considered it a failure at all. I'm not sure if I had a better reason
when I originally wrote it, but for now just add commentary about the
possible expectations and why it behaves the way it does right now.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test had multiple issues causing it to fail for the wrong
reason(s):
* rename/rename(1to2) conflicts have always left the original source
path present in the working directory and index (at stage 1). Thus,
the triple rename/rename(1to2) should result in 9 unstaged files,
not 6.
* It messed up the three-way content merge for checking the results of
merging for one of the renames, accidentally turning it into a
two-way merge.
* It got the contents of the base files it was using to compare
against wrong, due to an off-by-one error, and overwrite-redirection
('>') instead of append-redirection ('>>').
* It used slightly too-long conflict markers
* It didn't include filenames in the conflict marker hunks (granted,
that was a shortcoming of the merge-recursive backend for rename/add
and rename/rename(2to1) conflicts, but since it's
test_expect_failure anyway we might as well make it expect our
preferred behavior rather than some compromise that we can't yet
reach anyway).
Fix these issues so that a merge backend which correctly handles these
kinds of nested conflicts will pass the test.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit da1e295e00 ("t604[236]: do not run setup in separate tests",
2019-10-22) removed approximately half the tests (which were setup-only
tests) in t6043 by turning them into functions that the subsequent test
would call as their first step. This ensured that any test from this
file could be run entirely independently of all the other tests in the
file. Unfortunately, the call to the new setup function was missed in
two of the test_expect_failure cases. Add them in.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apparently I don't know how to count untracked files, and since the
tests in question were marked as test_expect_failure, no one ever
noticed it until now. Correct the count, as these tests clearly create
three untracked files ('out', 'err', and 'file_count').
(I believe this problem arose because earlier incarnations counted lines
via a pipe to 'wc -l'. Reviewers asked that it be replaced by writing
the output to a file and using test_line_count, but when the temporary
output was added to a separate file, the count of untracked files should
have increased.)
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano
René Scharfe
Derrick Stolee
Elijah Newren
Antti Keränen
Philippe Blain
Jeff King
Sergey Organov