1
0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-09-22 11:21:15 +02:00
Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andy Parkins
46d409d0bf update-hook: remove e-mail sending hook.
The update hook's only job is to decide is a particular update
is allowed or not.  It was not the right place to send out
update notification e-mails from to begin with, as the final
stage of updating refs can fail after this hook runs.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-24 22:30:53 -07:00
Andy Parkins
0a0d080bdc update-hook: abort early if the project description is unset
It was annoying to always have the first email from a project be from
the "Unnamed repository; edit this file to name it for gitweb project";
just because it's so easy to forget to set it.

This patch checks to see if the description file is still default (or
empty) and aborts if so - allowing you to fix the problem before sending
out silly looking emails to every developer.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-22 03:02:31 -07:00
Andy Parkins
c47e6a43d3 update-hook: fix incorrect use of git-describe and sed for finding previous tag
Previously git-describe would output lines of the form
 v1.1.1-gf509d56
The update hook found the dash and stripped it off using
 sed 's/-g.*//'
The remainder was then used as the previous tag name.

However, git-describe has changed format.  The output is now of the form
 v1.1.1-23-gf509d56
The above sed fragment doesn't strip the middle "-23", and so the
previous tag name used would be "v1.1.1-23".  This is incorrect.

Since the hook script was written, git-describe now gained support for
"--abbrev=0", which it uses as a special flag to tell it not to output
anything other than the nearest tag name.  This patch fixes the problem,
and prevents any future recurrence by using this new flag rather than
sed to find the previous tag.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-14 09:14:51 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
4808bec6f9 Merge branch 'maint'
* maint:
  Fix quoting in update hook template
2007-03-02 16:57:53 -08:00
Gerrit Pape
b8ac23bcf8 Fix quoting in update hook template
By default allowunannotated is unset in the repo config, hence
$allowunannotated is empty, and must be quoted to not break the syntax.

Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-02 15:11:52 -08:00
Andy Parkins
3d84df43e1 Sample update hook: typofix and modernization to use "git log"
Instead of using antiquated "git-rev-parse | git-rev-list"
pipeline, it is easier to use "git-rev-list" or "git-log" these
days, as Linus points out.

While we are at it, fix the typo on variable name $newref that
should be $newrev.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-03-02 15:06:25 -08:00
Andy Parkins
9a894e8e7c The "table-of-contents" in the update hook script should match the body
44478d99ee introduced a filter using "git-rev-parse --not --all" to the
log display to prevent the display of revisions already in the
repository.  However, the table of contents generation didn't get that
same update.

This patch fixes that.  The table of contents before the log and the log
now both display the same list of revisions.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-02-14 10:14:26 -08:00
Andy Parkins
44478d99ee Only show log entries for new revisions in hooks--update
If you were issuing emails for two branches, and one merged the other,
you would get the same log messages appearing in two separate emails.

e.g. A working repository, where the last push to central was done at
     the revision marked "B", after which two branches were developed
     further.

  * -- B -- 1 -- 1 -- M (branch1)
        \           /
         2 -- 2 -- 2 (branch2)

Now imagine that branch2 is pushed to the email-generating repository;
an email containing all the "2" revisions would be sent.  Now, let's say
branch1 is pushed, the old update hook would run

 git-rev-list $newrev ^$baserev

Where $newrev would be "M" and $baserev would be "B".  This list
includes all the "2" revisions as well as all the "1" revisions.

This patch addresses this problem by using

 git-rev-parse --not --all | git-rev-list --stdin $newrev ^$baserev

To inhibit the display of all revisions that are already in the
repository.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-02-13 21:40:24 -08:00
Andy Parkins
72f627d2bc Fix potential command line overflow in hooks--update
In a repository with a large number of refs, the following command line
could easily overflow the command line size limitations

 git-rev-list $newref $(git-rev-parse --not --all)

Fortunately, git-rev-list already has the means to cope with this
situation with the --stdin switch

 git-rev-parse --not --all | git-rev-list --stdin $newref

Which is exactly what this patch does.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-02-13 09:33:09 -08:00
Pavel Roskin
3dff5379bf Assorted typo fixes
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-02-03 21:49:54 -08:00
Andy Parkins
829a686f1b Heavily expanded update hook to send more useful emails than the old hook
I know it's only an example, but having this might save someone else the
trouble of writing an enhanced version for themselves.

It basically does the same job as the old update hook, but with these
differences:
 * The recipients list is read from the repository config file from
   hooks.mailinglist
 * Updating unannotated tags can be allowed by setting
   hooks.allowunannotated
 * Announcement emails (via annotated tag creation) can be sent to a
   different mailing list by setting hooks.announcelist
 * Output email is more verbose and generates specific content depending
   on whether the ref is a tag, an annotated tag, a branch, or a
   tracking branch
 * The email is easier to filter; the subject line is prefixed with
   [SCM] and a project description pulled from the "description" file
 * It catches (and displays differently) branch updates that are
   performed with a --force

Obviously, it's nothing that clever - it's the update hook I use on my
repositories but I've tried to keep it general, and tried to make the
output always relevant to the type of update.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-01-28 14:38:11 -08:00
Andy Parkins
a69aba6af3 UNIX reference time of 1970-01-01 00:00 is UTC timezone, not local time zone
I got bitten because in the UK (where one would expect 1970-01-01 00:00
to be UTC 0) some politicians decided to mess around with daylight
savings time from 1968 to 1971; it was permanently BST (+0100).  That
means that on my computer the following is true:

	$ date --date="1970-01-01 00:00" +"%F %T %z (%Z)"
	1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0100 (BST)

This of course means that the --date argument to date is specified in
local time, not UTC.  So when the hooks--update script does this:

	date=$(date --date="1970-01-01 00:00:00 $ts seconds")

It's actually saying (in my timezone) "1970-01-01 01:00:00 UTC" + $ts.
Clearly this is wrong.  The UNIX epoch started at midnight UTC not 1am
UTC.

This leads to the tagged time in hooks--update being shown as one hour
earlier than the true tagged time (in my timezone).  The problem would
be worse for other timezones.  For a +1300 timezone on 1970-01-01, the
tagged time would be 13 hours earlier.  Oops.

The solution is to force the reference time to UTC, which is what this
patch does.  In my timezone:

	$ date --date="1970-01-01 00:00 +0000" +"%F %T %z (%Z)"
	1970-01-01 01:00:00 +0100 (BST)

Much better.

Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
2007-01-28 14:35:50 -08:00
Jim Meyering
b81ba57124 update hook: redirect _both_ diagnostic lines to stderr upon tag failure
Otherwise, sending the diagnostic to stdout would provoke a
protocol failure.

Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-12-28 14:12:48 -08:00
Eric Wong
3a895e0268 templates/hooks--update: replace diffstat calls with git diff --stat
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-07-08 03:11:16 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
41e79c9559 sample update-hook: sanely handle a new branch head.
Instead of showing all the history since the beginning of time
leading to the the branch head, show only the changes this new
branch brings to the world.

This originally came from Linus and tested by Andreas Ericsson.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-01-24 17:38:06 -08:00
Andreas Ericsson
8a3ee7c314 update-hook: Major overhaul (handling tags, mainly).
This is the update hook we use in all our git-repos.

It has some improvements over the original version, namely:
* Don't send every commit since dawn of time when adding a new tag.
* When updating an annotated tag, just send the diffs since the last tag.
* Add diffstat output for 'normal' commits (top) and annotated tags (bottom).
* Block un-annotated tags in shared repos.

I'm a bit uncertain about that last one, but it demonstrates how to
disallow updates of a ref which we use, so I kept it.

Note that git-describe is needed for the "changes since last annotated tag"
thing to work.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-01-24 17:27:33 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
60abce3c0f Fix hooks/update template.
Make the example address RFC2606 (aka BCP0032) compliant.  Also
fix a couple of shell script errors.

Noted and fixed by Matthew Wilcox and Andreas Ericsson.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-11-21 12:21:06 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
86b13da46c scripts: equality test '==' is not portable.
On NetBSD 3 we trigger an error:

    [: ==: unexpected operator

Double-equal is accepted by bash built-in '[' and bash(1) suggests
using '=' for strict POSIX compliance (test(1) from coreutils does not
mention '==').  Eradicate their uses everywhere.

[jc: Somebody with a pseudonym kindly sent a message to let
 me know about the problem privately; I do not have access to a NetBSD
 box.]

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-09-02 10:53:15 -07:00
Josef Weidendorfer
c65a9470fb [PATCH] Fixed/Extended example for update hook
Add sample code to distinguish --force rebased head and simple
fast-forward.  At the same time fixes a real bug; the "new ref"
path was using a wrong parameter.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-15 03:00:21 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
8d5afef0f9 Install sample hooks
A template mechanism to populate newly initialized repository
with default set of files is introduced.  Use it to ship example
hooks that can be used for update and post update checks, as
Josef Weidendorfer suggests.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2005-08-03 16:27:38 -07:00