The reflog messages when finishing a rebase hard code "rebase" rather
than using GIT_REFLOG_ACTION.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog message for every pick after running "rebase --skip" looks
like
rebase (skip) (pick): commit subject line
Fix this by not appending " (skip)" to the reflog action.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog message for a conflict resolution committed by "rebase
--continue" looks like
rebase (continue): commit subject line
Unfortunately the reflog message each subsequent pick look like
rebase (continue) (pick): commit subject line
Fix this by setting the reflog message for "rebase --continue" in
sequencer_continue() so it does not affect subsequent commits. This
introduces a memory leak similar to the one leaking GIT_REFLOG_ACTION
in pick_commits(). Both of these will be fixed in a future series that
stops the sequencer calling setenv().
If we fail to commit the staged changes then we error out so
GIT_REFLOG_ACTION does not need to be reset in that case.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use move_to_original_branch() when reattaching HEAD after a fast-forward
rather than open coding a copy of that code. move_to_original_branch()
does not call reset_head() if head_name is NULL but there should be no
user visible changes even though we currently call reset_head() in that
case. The reason for this is that the reset_head() call does not add a
message to the reflog because we're not changing the commit that HEAD
points to and so lock_ref_for_update() elides the update. When head_name
is not NULL then reset_head() behaves like "git symbolic-ref" and so the
reflog is updated.
Note that the removal of "strbuf_release(&msg)" is safe as there is an
identical call just above this hunk which can be seen by viewing the
diff with -U6.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Given the name of the option it is confusing if --keep-base actually
changes the base of the branch without --fork-point being explicitly
given on the command line.
The combination of --keep-base with an explicit --fork-point is still
supported even though --fork-point means we do not keep the same base
if the upstream branch has been rewound. We do this in case anyone is
relying on this behavior which is tested in t3431[1]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200715032014.GA10818@generichostname/
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As --keep-base does not rebase the branch it is confusing if it
removes commits that have been cherry-picked to the upstream branch.
As --reapply-cherry-picks is not supported by the "apply" backend this
commit ensures that cherry-picks are reapplied by forcing the upstream
commit to match the onto commit unless --no-reapply-cherry-picks is
given.
Reported-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Separate out calculating the merge base between 'onto' and 'HEAD' from
the check for whether we can fast-forward or not. This means we can skip
the fast-forward checks when the rebase is forced and avoid calculating
the merge-base between 'HEAD' and 'onto' when --keep-base is given.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge_base is not a very descriptive name, the variable always holds
the merge-base of 'branch' and 'onto' which is commit at the base of
the branch being rebased so rename it to branch_base.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using a struct commit rather than a struct oid to hold orig_head means
that we error out straight away if the branch being rebased does not
point to a commit. It also simplifies the code that handles finding
the merge base and fork point as it no longer has to convert from an
oid to a commit.
To avoid changing the behavior of "git rebase <upstream> <branch>" we
keep the existing call to read_ref() and use lookup_commit_object()
on the oid returned by that rather than calling
lookup_commit_reference_by_name() which applies the ref dwim rules to
its argument.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The state files for 'onto' and 'orig_head' should contain a full hex
oid, change the reading functions from get_oid() to get_oid_hex() to
reflect this. They should also name commits and not tags so add and use
a function that looks up a commit from an oid like
lookup_commit_reference() but without dereferencing tags.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Various error messages that talk about the removal of
"--preserve-merges" in "rebase" have been strengthened, and "rebase
--abort" learned to get out of a state that was left by an earlier
use of the option.
* po/rebase-preserve-merges:
rebase: translate a die(preserve-merges) message
rebase: note `preserve` merges may be a pull config option
rebase: help users when dying with `preserve-merges`
rebase.c: state preserve-merges has been removed
This is a user facing message for a situation seen in the wild.
Translate it.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `--preserve-merges` option was removed by v2.34.0. However
users may not be aware that it is also a Pull configuration option,
which is still offered by major IDE vendors such as Visual Studio.
Extend the `--preserve-merges` die message to also direct users to
the possible use of the `preserve` option in the `pull.rebase` config.
This is an additional 'belt and braces' information statement.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git would die if a "rebase --preserve-merges" was in progress.
Users could neither --quit, --abort, nor --continue the rebase.
Make the `rebase --abort` option available to allow users to remove
traces of any preserve-merges rebase, even if they had upgraded
during a rebase.
One trigger case was an unexpectedly difficult to resolve conflict, as
reported on the `git-users` group.
(https://groups.google.com/g/git-for-windows/c/3jMWbBlXXHM)
Other potential use-cases include git-experts using the portable
'Git on a stick' to help users with an older git version.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since feebd2d256 (rebase: hide --preserve-merges option, 2019-10-18)
this option is now removed as stated in the subsequent release notes.
Fix and reflow the option tip.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--keep-base rebases onto the merge base of the given upstream and the
current HEAD regardless of whether a branch is given. This is contrary
to the documentation and to the option's intended purpose. Instead,
rebase onto the merge base of the given upstream and the given branch.
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is an if statement where both if and else have the same
assignment of options.type to REBASE_MERGE. Simplify
it by getting that assigmnent out of the if.
Signed-off-by: Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rebase A B" where B is not a commit should behave as if the
HEAD got detached at B and then the detached HEAD got rebased on top
of A. A bug however overwrites the current branch to point at B,
when B is a descendant of A (i.e. the rebase ends up being a
fast-forward). See [1] for the original bug report.
The callstack from checkout_up_to_date() is the following:
cmd_rebase()
-> checkout_up_to_date()
-> reset_head()
-> update_refs()
-> update_ref()
When B is not a valid branch but an oid, rebase sets the head_name
of rebase_options to NULL. This value gets passed down this call
chain through the branch member of reset_head_opts also getting set
to NULL all the way to update_refs().
Then update_refs() checks ropts.branch to decide whether or not to switch
branches. If ropts.branch is NULL, it calls update_ref() to update HEAD.
At this point however, from rebase's point of view, we want a detached
HEAD. But, since checkout_up_to_date() does not set the RESET_HEAD_DETACH
flag, the update_ref() call will deference HEAD and update the branch its
pointing to. We want the HEAD detached at B instead.
Fix this bug by adding the RESET_HEAD_DETACH flag in
checkout_up_to_date if B is not a valid branch, so that once
reset_head() calls update_refs(), it calls update_ref() with
REF_NO_DEREF which updates HEAD directly intead of deferencing it
and updating the branch that HEAD points to.
Also add a test to ensure the correct behavior.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/YiokTm3GxIZQQUow@newk/
Reported-by: Michael McClimon <michael@mcclimon.org>
Signed-off-by: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Unify more messages to help l10n.
* ja/i18n-common-messages:
i18n: fix some misformated placeholders in command synopsis
i18n: remove from i18n strings that do not hold translatable parts
i18n: factorize "invalid value" messages
i18n: factorize more 'incompatible options' messages
Use an internal call to reset_head() helper function instead of
spawning "git checkout" in "rebase", and update code paths that are
involved in the change.
* pw/use-in-process-checkout-in-rebase:
rebase -m: don't fork git checkout
rebase --apply: set ORIG_HEAD correctly
rebase --apply: fix reflog
reset_head(): take struct rebase_head_opts
rebase: cleanup reset_head() calls
create_autostash(): remove unneeded parameter
reset_head(): make default_reflog_action optional
reset_head(): factor out ref updates
reset_head(): remove action parameter
rebase --apply: don't run post-checkout hook if there is an error
rebase: do not remove untracked files on checkout
rebase: pass correct arguments to post-checkout hook
t5403: refactor rebase post-checkout hook tests
rebase: factor out checkout for up to date branch
More "config-based hooks".
* ab/config-based-hooks-2:
run-command: remove old run_hook_{le,ve}() hook API
receive-pack: convert push-to-checkout hook to hook.h
read-cache: convert post-index-change to use hook.h
commit: convert {pre-commit,prepare-commit-msg} hook to hook.h
git-p4: use 'git hook' to run hooks
send-email: use 'git hook run' for 'sendemail-validate'
git hook run: add an --ignore-missing flag
hooks: convert worktree 'post-checkout' hook to hook library
hooks: convert non-worktree 'post-checkout' hook to hook library
merge: convert post-merge to use hook.h
am: convert applypatch-msg to use hook.h
rebase: convert pre-rebase to use hook.h
hook API: add a run_hooks_l() wrapper
am: convert {pre,post}-applypatch to use hook.h
gc: use hook library for pre-auto-gc hook
hook API: add a run_hooks() wrapper
hook: add 'run' subcommand
At the start of a rebase, ORIG_HEAD is updated to the tip of the
branch being rebased. Unfortunately reset_head() always uses the
current value of HEAD for this which is incorrect if the rebase is
started with "git rebase <upstream> <branch>" as in that case
ORIG_HEAD should be updated to <branch>. This only affects the "apply"
backend as the "merge" backend does not yet use reset_head() for the
initial checkout. Fix this by passing in orig_head when calling
reset_head() and add some regression tests.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
move_to_original_branch() passes the message intended for the branch
reflog as `orig_head_msg`. Fix this by adding a `branch_msg` member to
struct reset_head_opts and add a regression test. Note that these
reflog messages do not respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION. They are not alone
in that and will be fixed in a future series.
The "merge" backend already has tests that check both the branch and
HEAD reflogs.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This function takes a confusingly large number of parameters which
makes it difficult to remember which order to pass them in. The
following commits will add a couple more parameters which makes the
problem worse. To address this change the function to take a struct of
options. Using a struct means that it is no longer necessary to
remember which order to pass the parameters in and anyone reading the
code can easily see which value is passed to each parameter.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If ORIG_HEAD is not set by passing RESET_ORIG_HEAD then there is no
need to pass anything for reflog_orig_head. In addition to the callers
fixed in this commit move_to_original_branch() also passes
reflog_orig_head without setting ORIG_HEAD. That caller is mistakenly
passing the message it wants to put in the branch reflog which is not
currently possible so we delay fixing that caller until we can pass
the message as the branch reflog.
A later commit will make it a BUG() to pass reflog_orig_head without
RESET_ORIG_HEAD, that changes cannot be done here as it needs to wait
for move_to_original_branch() to be fixed first.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The default_reflog parameter of create_autostash() is passed to
reset_head(). However as creating a stash does not involve updating
any refs the parameter is not used by reset_head(). Removing the
parameter from create_autostash() simplifies the callers.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This parameter is only needed when a ref is going to be updated and
the caller does not pass an explicit reflog message. Callers that are
only discarding uncommitted changes in the working tree such as such
as "rebase --skip" or create_autostash() do not update any refs so
should not have to worry about passing this parameter.
This change is not intended to have any user visible changes. The
pointer comparison between `oid` and `&head_oid` checks that the
caller did not pass an oid to be checked out. As no callers pass
RESET_HEAD_RUN_POST_CHECKOUT_HOOK without passing an oid there are
no changes to when the post-checkout hook is run. As update_ref() only
updates the ref if the oid passed to it differs from the current ref
there are no changes to when HEAD is updated.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The only use of the action parameter is to setup the error messages
for unpack_trees(). All but two cases pass either "checkout" or
"reset". The case that passes "reset --hard" would be better passing
"reset" so that the error messages match the builtin reset command
like all the other callers that are doing a reset. The case that
passes "Fast-forwarded" is only updating HEAD and so the parameter is
unused in that case as it does not call unpack_trees(). The value to
pass to setup_unpack_trees_porcelain() can be determined by checking
whether flags contains RESET_HEAD_HARD without the caller having to
specify it.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This code is heavily indented and it will be convenient later in the
series to have it in its own function.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move the pre-rebase hook away from run-command.h to and over to the
new hook.h library.
Since this hook needs arguments introduce a run_hooksl() wrapper, like
run_hooks(), but it takes varargs.
Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Even if some of these messages are not subject to gettext i18n, this
helps bring a single style of message for a given error type.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Noël Avila <jn.avila@free.fr>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "--preserve-merges" option of "git rebase" has been removed.
* js/retire-preserve-merges:
sequencer: restrict scope of a formerly public function
rebase: remove a no-longer-used function
rebase: stop mentioning the -p option in comments
rebase: remove obsolete code comment
rebase: drop the internal `rebase--interactive` command
git-svn: drop support for `--preserve-merges`
rebase: drop support for `--preserve-merges`
pull: remove support for `--rebase=preserve`
tests: stop testing `git rebase --preserve-merges`
remote: warn about unhandled branch.<name>.rebase values
t5520: do not use `pull.rebase=preserve`
"git rebase <upstream> <tag>" failed when aborted in the middle, as
it mistakenly tried to write the tag object instead of peeling it
to HEAD.
* pw/rebase-of-a-tag-fix:
rebase: dereference tags
rebase: use lookup_commit_reference_by_name()
rebase: use our standard error return value
t3407: rework rebase --quit tests
t3407: strengthen rebase --abort tests
t3407: use test_path_is_missing
t3407: rename a variable
t3407: use test_cmp_rev
t3407: use test_commit
t3407: run tests in $TEST_DIRECTORY
A rebase started with 'git rebase <A> <B>' is conceptually to first
checkout <B> and run 'git rebase <A>' starting from that state. 'git
rebase --abort' in the middle of such a rebase should take us back to
the state we checked out <B>.
This used to work, even when <B> is a tag that points at a commit,
until Git 2.20.0 when the command was reimplemented in C. The command
now complains that the tag object itself cannot be checked out, which
may be technically correct but is not what the user asked to do.
Fix this old regression by using lookup_commit_reference_by_name()
when parsing <B>. The scripted version did not need to peel the tag
because the commands it passed the tag to (e.g 'git reset') peeled the
tag themselves.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
peel_committish() appears to have been copied from the scripted rebase
but it duplicates the functionality of
lookup_commit_reference_by_name() so lets use that instead.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git uses −1 to signal an error. The builtin rebase converts these to
+1 all over the place using !! (presumably because the in the scripted
version an error was signalled by +1). This is confusing and clutters
the code, we only need to convert the value when the function returns.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The run-command API has been updated so that the callers can easily
ask the file descriptors open for packfiles to be closed immediately
before spawning commands that may trigger auto-gc.
* js/run-command-close-packs:
Close object store closer to spawning child processes
run_auto_maintenance(): implicitly close the object store
run-command: offer to close the object store before running
run-command: prettify the `RUN_COMMAND_*` flags
pull: release packs before fetching
commit-graph: when closing the graph, also release the slab
Various mergy operations have been prepared to work efficiently
with the sparse index.
* ds/mergies-with-sparse-index:
sparse-index: integrate with cherry-pick and rebase
sequencer: ensure full index if not ORT strategy
t1092: add cherry-pick, rebase tests
merge-ort: expand only for out-of-cone conflicts
merge: make sparse-aware with ORT
diff: ignore sparse paths in diffstat
"git rebase" by default skips changes that are equivalent to
commits that are already in the history the branch is rebased onto;
give messages when this happens to let the users be aware of
skipped commits, and also teach them how to tell "rebase" to keep
duplicated changes.
* js/advise-when-skipping-cherry-picked:
sequencer: advise if skipping cherry-picked commit
The hard work was already done with 'git merge' and the ORT strategy.
Just add extra tests to see that we get the expected results in the
non-conflict cases.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before spawning the auto maintenance, we need to make sure that we
release all open file handles to all the `.pack` files (and MIDX files
and commit-graph files and...) so that the maintenance process has the
freedom to delete those files.
So far, we did this manually every time before calling
`run_auto_maintenance()`. With the new `close_object_store` flag, we can
do that implicitly in that function, which is more robust because future
callers won't be able to forget to close the object store.
Note: this changes behavior slightly, as we previously _always_ closed
the object store, but now we only close the object store when actually
running the auto maintenance. In practice, this should not matter (if
anything, it might speed up operations where auto maintenance is
disabled).
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We no longer support `--preserve-merges`, therefore it does not make
sense to keep mentioning that option, even in code comments.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that we no longer have a `--preserve-merges` backend, this comment
needs to be adjusted.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It was only used by the `--preserve-merges` backend, which we just
removed.
Helped-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This option was deprecated in favor of `--rebase-merges` some time ago,
and now we retire it.
To assist users to transition away, we do not _actually_ remove the
option, but now we no longer implement the functionality. Instead, we
offer a helpful error message suggesting which option to use.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
