As afb31ad9 (t1010: fix unnoticed failure on Windows, 2021-12-11)
said:
On Microsoft Windows, a directory name should never end with a period.
Quoting from Microsoft documentation[1]:
Do not end a file or directory name with a space or a period.
Although the underlying file system may support such names, the
Windows shell and user interface does not.
[1]: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/naming-a-file
and the condition addressed by this change is exactly that. If the
platform is unable to properly create these sample patches about a
file that lives in a directory whose name ends with a SP, there is
no point testing how "git apply" behaves there on the filesystem.
Even though the ultimate purpose of "git apply" is to apply a patch
and to update the filesystem entities, this particular test is
mainly about parsing a patch on a funny pathname correctly, and even
on a system that is incapable of checking out the resulting state
correctly on its filesystem, at least the parsing can and should work
fine. Rewrite the test to work inside the index without touching the
filesystem.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git apply" uses the pathname parsed out of the "diff --git" header
to decide which path is being patched, but this is used only when
there is no other names available in the patch. When there is any
content change (like we can see in this patch, that modifies the
contents of "apply.c") or rename (which comes with "rename from" and
"rename to" extended diff headers), the names are available without
having to parse this header.
When we do need to parse this header, a special care needs to be
taken, as the name of a directory or a file can have a SP in it so
it is not like "find a space, and take everything before the space
and that is the preimage filename, everything after the space is the
postimage filename". We have a loop that stops at every SP on the
"diff --git a/dir/file b/dir/foo" line and see if that SP is the
right place that separates such a pair of names.
Unfortunately, this loop can terminate prematurely when a crafted
directory name ended with a SP. The next pathname component after
that SP (i.e. the beginning of the possible postimage filename) will
be a slash, and instead of rejecting that position as the valid
separation point between pre- and post-image filenames and keep
looping, we stopped processing right there.
The fix is simple. Instead of stopping and giving up, keep going on
when we see such a condition.
Reported-by: Han Young <hanyang.tony@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Clear the "boundary_commits" object_array in release_revisions(). This
makes a few more tests pass under SANITIZE=leak, including
"t/t4126-apply-empty.sh" which started failed as an UNLEAK() in
cmd_format_patch() was removed in a preceding commit.
This also re-marks the various tests relying on "git format-patch" as
passing under "SANITIZE=leak", in the preceding "revisions API users:
use release_revisions() in builtin/log.c" commit those were marked as
failing as we removed the UNLEAK(rev) from cmd_format_patch() in
"builtin/log.c".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for having the "log" family of functions make wider use
of release_revisions() let's have them call it just before
exiting. This changes the "log", "whatchanged", "show",
"format-patch", etc. commands, all of which live in this file.
The release_revisions() API still only frees the "pending" member, but
will learn to release more members of "struct rev_info" in subsequent
commits.
In the case of "format-patch" revert the addition of UNLEAK() in
dee839a263 (format-patch: mark rev_info with UNLEAK, 2021-12-16),
which will cause several tests that previously passed under
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" to start failing.
In subsequent commits we'll now be able to use those tests to check
whether that part of the API is really leaking memory, and will fix
all of those memory leaks. Removing the UNLEAK() allows us to make
incremental progress in that direction. See [1] for further details
about this approach.
Note that the release_revisions() will not be sufficient to deal with
the code in cmd_show() added in 5d7eeee2ac (git-show: grok blobs,
trees and tags, too, 2006-12-14) which clobbers the "pending" array in
the case of "OBJ_COMMIT". That will need to be dealt with by some
future follow-up work.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/220218.861r00ib86.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Broken &&-chains in the test scripts have been corrected.
* es/test-chain-lint:
t6000-t9999: detect and signal failure within loop
t5000-t5999: detect and signal failure within loop
t4000-t4999: detect and signal failure within loop
t0000-t3999: detect and signal failure within loop
tests: simplify by dropping unnecessary `for` loops
tests: apply modern idiom for exiting loop upon failure
tests: apply modern idiom for signaling test failure
tests: fix broken &&-chains in `{...}` groups
tests: fix broken &&-chains in `$(...)` command substitutions
tests: fix broken &&-chains in compound statements
tests: use test_write_lines() to generate line-oriented output
tests: simplify construction of large blocks of text
t9107: use shell parameter expansion to avoid breaking &&-chain
t6300: make `%(raw:size) --shell` test more robust
t5516: drop unnecessary subshell and command invocation
t4202: clarify intent by creating expected content less cleverly
t1020: avoid aborting entire test script when one test fails
t1010: fix unnoticed failure on Windows
t/lib-pager: use sane_unset() to avoid breaking &&-chain
"git apply" has been taught to ignore a message without a patch
with the "--allow-empty" option. It also learned to honor the
"--quiet" option given from the command line.
* jz/apply-quiet-and-allow-empty:
git-apply: add --allow-empty flag
git-apply: add --quiet flag
Some users or scripts will pipe "git diff"
output to "git apply" when replaying diffs
or commits. In these cases, they will rely
on the return value of "git apply" to know
whether the diff was applied successfully.
However, for empty commits, "git apply" will
fail. This complicates scripts since they
have to either buffer the diff and check
its length, or run diff again with "exit-code",
essentially doing the diff twice.
Add the "--allow-empty" flag to "git apply"
which allows it to handle both empty diffs
and empty commits created by "git format-patch
--always" by doing nothing and returning 0.
Add tests for both with and without --allow-empty.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhang <jerry@skydio.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Take advantage of test_write_lines() to generate line-oriented output
rather than using for-loops or a series of `echo` commands. Not only is
test_write_lines() a natural fit for such a task, but there is less
opportunity for a broken &&-chain.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Mark some tests that match "*apply*" as passing when git is compiled
with SANITIZE=leak. They'll now be listed as running under the
"GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" test mode (the "linux-leaks" CI
target).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test did "reset --hard" (where the HEAD commit has an empty
blob at path "empty") followed by "> empty", expecting that
the index does not notice the file _changed_ since git wrote
it out upon "reset" if the redirection is done quickly enough.
There was no need to do the emptying, and it gave a wrong result
if "reset --hard" happened on time T and then ">empty" happened on
the next second T+1. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we see no context nor deleted line in the patch, we used to declare
that the patch creates a new file. But some people create an empty file
and then apply a patch to it. Similarly, a patch that delete everything
is not a deletion patch either.
This commit corrects these two issues. Together with the previous commit,
it allows a diff between an empty file and a line-ful file to be treated
as both creation patch and "add stuff to an existing empty file",
depending on the context. A new test t4126 demonstrates the fix.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Junio C Hamano
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Jerry Zhang
Eric Sunshine