1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-05-18 04:16:10 +02:00

Revert "split-index: add and use unshare_split_index()"

This reverts commit f9d7abec2ad2f9eb3d8873169cc28c34273df082;
see public-inbox.org/git/CAP8UFD0bOfzY-_hBDKddOcJdPUpP2KEVaX_SrCgvAMYAHtseiQ@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2017-06-24 12:02:39 -07:00
parent de950c5773
commit 64719b115d
3 changed files with 21 additions and 47 deletions

View File

@ -1877,9 +1877,15 @@ int discard_index(struct index_state *istate)
{
int i;
unshare_split_index(istate, 1);
for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++)
for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
if (istate->cache[i]->index &&
istate->split_index &&
istate->split_index->base &&
istate->cache[i]->index <= istate->split_index->base->cache_nr &&
istate->cache[i] == istate->split_index->base->cache[istate->cache[i]->index - 1])
continue;
free(istate->cache[i]);
}
resolve_undo_clear_index(istate);
istate->cache_nr = 0;
istate->cache_changed = 0;

View File

@ -73,17 +73,10 @@ void move_cache_to_base_index(struct index_state *istate)
int i;
/*
* If "si" is shared with another index_state (e.g. by
* unpack-trees code), we will need to duplicate split_index
* struct. It's not happening now though, luckily.
* do not delete old si->base, its index entries may be shared
* with istate->cache[]. Accept a bit of leaking here because
* this code is only used by short-lived update-index.
*/
assert(si->refcount <= 1);
unshare_split_index(istate, 0);
if (si->base) {
discard_index(si->base);
free(si->base);
}
si->base = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*si->base));
si->base->version = istate->version;
/* zero timestamp disables racy test in ce_write_index() */
@ -282,41 +275,11 @@ void finish_writing_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
istate->cache_nr = si->saved_cache_nr;
}
void unshare_split_index(struct index_state *istate, int discard)
{
struct split_index *si = istate->split_index;
int i;
if (!si || !si->base)
return;
for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[i];
struct cache_entry *new = NULL;
if (!ce->index ||
ce->index > si->base->cache_nr ||
ce != si->base->cache[ce->index - 1])
continue;
if (!discard) {
int len = ce_namelen(ce);
new = xcalloc(1, cache_entry_size(len));
copy_cache_entry(new, ce);
memcpy(new->name, ce->name, len);
new->index = 0;
}
istate->cache[i] = new;
}
}
void discard_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
{
struct split_index *si = istate->split_index;
if (!si)
return;
unshare_split_index(istate, 0);
istate->split_index = NULL;
si->refcount--;
if (si->refcount)
@ -365,8 +328,14 @@ void add_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
{
if (!istate->split_index)
return;
discard_split_index(istate);
istate->cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED;
if (istate->split_index) {
/*
* can't discard_split_index(&the_index); because that
* will destroy split_index->base->cache[], which may
* be shared with the_index.cache[]. So yeah we're
* leaking a bit here.
*/
istate->split_index = NULL;
istate->cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED;
}
}

View File

@ -33,6 +33,5 @@ void finish_writing_split_index(struct index_state *istate);
void discard_split_index(struct index_state *istate);
void add_split_index(struct index_state *istate);
void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate);
void unshare_split_index(struct index_state *istate, int discard);
#endif