1
0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-09-25 19:10:59 +02:00

apply: code simplification

Rewrite a bit hard-to-read ternary ?: expression into a cascade of
if/else.

Given that read-cache.c:add_index_entry() makes sure that the
.ce_mode member is filled with a reasonable value before placing a
cache entry in the index, if we see (ce_mode == 0), there is
something seriously wrong going on.  Catch such a bug and abort,
instead of silently ignoring such an entry and silently skipping
the check.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2023-12-26 15:32:18 -08:00
parent 01aff0ae85
commit 45b625142d

12
apply.c
View File

@ -3780,11 +3780,15 @@ static int check_preimage(struct apply_state *state,
}
if (!state->cached && !previous) {
if (!trust_executable_bit)
st_mode = (*ce && (*ce)->ce_mode)
? (*ce)->ce_mode : patch->old_mode;
else
if (*ce && !(*ce)->ce_mode)
BUG("ce_mode == 0 for path '%s'", old_name);
if (trust_executable_bit)
st_mode = ce_mode_from_stat(*ce, st->st_mode);
else if (*ce)
st_mode = (*ce)->ce_mode;
else
st_mode = patch->old_mode;
}
if (patch->is_new < 0)