1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git.git synced 2024-05-19 12:56:08 +02:00
git/git-request-pull.sh

153 lines
3.6 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
# Copyright 2005, Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
#
# This file is licensed under the GPL v2, or a later version
# at the discretion of Linus Torvalds.
USAGE='<start> <url> [<end>]'
LONG_USAGE='Summarizes the changes between two commits to the standard output,
and includes the given URL in the generated summary.'
SUBDIRECTORY_OK='Yes'
OPTIONS_KEEPDASHDASH=
OPTIONS_SPEC='git request-pull [options] start url [end]
--
p show patch text as well
'
. git-sh-setup
GIT_PAGER=
export GIT_PAGER
patch=
while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac
do
case "$1" in
-p)
patch=-p ;;
--)
shift; break ;;
-*)
usage ;;
*)
break ;;
esac
shift
done
base=$1 url=$2 head=${3-HEAD} status=0 branch_name=
headref=$(git symbolic-ref -q "$head")
if git show-ref -q --verify "$headref"
then
branch_name=${headref#refs/heads/}
if test "z$branch_name" = "z$headref" ||
! git config "branch.$branch_name.description" >/dev/null
then
branch_name=
fi
fi
tag_name=$(git describe --exact "$head^0" 2>/dev/null)
test -n "$base" && test -n "$url" || usage
baserev=$(git rev-parse --verify "$base"^0) &&
headrev=$(git rev-parse --verify "$head"^0) || exit
merge_base=$(git merge-base $baserev $headrev) ||
Improve request-pull to handle non-rebased branches This is actually a few different changes to request-pull, making it slightly smarter: 1) Minor cleanup of revision->base variable names, making it follow the head/headrev naming convention that is already in use. 2) Compute the merge-base between the two revisions upfront and reuse that selected merge-base to create the diffstat. 3) Refuse to generate a pull request for branches that have no existing relationship. These aren't very common and would mess up our diffstat generation. 4) Disable the PAGER when running shortlog and diff, as these would otherwise activate the pager for each command when git-request-pull is run on a tty. Instead users can get the entire output paged (if desired) using `git -p request-pull`. 5) Use shortlog rather than `git log | git shortlog` now that recent shortlog versions are able to run the revision listing internally. 6) Attempt to resolve the input URL using the user's configured remotes. This is useful if the URL you want the recipient to see is also the one you used to push your changes. If not a config-file remote could easily be setup for the public URL and request-pull could be passed that name instead. 7) Automatically guess and include the remote branch name in the body of the message. We list the branch name immediately after the URL, making it easy for the recipient to copy and paste the entire line onto a `git pull` command line. Rumor has it Linus likes this format, for exactly that reason. If multiple branches at the remote match $headrev we take the first one returned by peek-remote and assume it is suitable. If no branches are available we warn the user about the problem, but insert a static string that is not a valid branch name and would be obvious to anyone reading the message as being totally incorrect. This allows users to still generate a template message without network access (for example) and hand-correct the bits that cannot be verified. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-01 08:08:23 +02:00
die "fatal: No commits in common between $base and $head"
# $head is the token given from the command line, and $tag_name, if
# exists, is the tag we are going to show the commit information for.
# If that tag exists at the remote and it points at the commit, use it.
# Otherwise, if a branch with the same name as $head exists at the remote
# and their values match, use that instead.
#
# Otherwise find a random ref that matches $headrev.
find_matching_ref='
sub abbr {
my $ref = shift;
if ($ref =~ s|^refs/heads/|| || $ref =~ s|^refs/tags/|tags/|) {
return $ref;
} else {
return $ref;
}
}
my ($tagged, $branch, $found);
while (<STDIN>) {
my ($sha1, $ref, $deref) = /^(\S+)\s+(\S+?)(\^\{\})?$/;
next unless ($sha1 eq $ARGV[1]);
$found = abbr($ref);
if ($deref && $ref eq "tags/$ARGV[2]") {
$tagged = $found;
last;
}
if ($ref =~ m|/\Q$ARGV[0]\E$|) {
$exact = $found;
}
}
if ($tagged) {
print "$tagged\n";
} elsif ($exact) {
print "$exact\n";
} elsif ($found) {
print "$found\n";
}
'
ref=$(git ls-remote "$url" | perl -e "$find_matching_ref" "$head" "$headrev" "$tag_name")
url=$(git ls-remote --get-url "$url")
Improve request-pull to handle non-rebased branches This is actually a few different changes to request-pull, making it slightly smarter: 1) Minor cleanup of revision->base variable names, making it follow the head/headrev naming convention that is already in use. 2) Compute the merge-base between the two revisions upfront and reuse that selected merge-base to create the diffstat. 3) Refuse to generate a pull request for branches that have no existing relationship. These aren't very common and would mess up our diffstat generation. 4) Disable the PAGER when running shortlog and diff, as these would otherwise activate the pager for each command when git-request-pull is run on a tty. Instead users can get the entire output paged (if desired) using `git -p request-pull`. 5) Use shortlog rather than `git log | git shortlog` now that recent shortlog versions are able to run the revision listing internally. 6) Attempt to resolve the input URL using the user's configured remotes. This is useful if the URL you want the recipient to see is also the one you used to push your changes. If not a config-file remote could easily be setup for the public URL and request-pull could be passed that name instead. 7) Automatically guess and include the remote branch name in the body of the message. We list the branch name immediately after the URL, making it easy for the recipient to copy and paste the entire line onto a `git pull` command line. Rumor has it Linus likes this format, for exactly that reason. If multiple branches at the remote match $headrev we take the first one returned by peek-remote and assume it is suitable. If no branches are available we warn the user about the problem, but insert a static string that is not a valid branch name and would be obvious to anyone reading the message as being totally incorrect. This allows users to still generate a template message without network access (for example) and hand-correct the bits that cannot be verified. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-01 08:08:23 +02:00
git show -s --format='The following changes since commit %H:
%s (%ci)
are available in the git repository at:
' $merge_base &&
echo " $url${ref+ $ref}" &&
git show -s --format='
for you to fetch changes up to %H:
%s (%ci)
----------------------------------------------------------------' $headrev &&
if test -n "$branch_name"
then
echo "(from the branch description for $branch_name local branch)"
echo
git config "branch.$branch_name.description"
fi &&
if test -n "$tag_name"
then
if test -z "$ref" || test "$ref" != "tags/$tag_name"
then
echo >&2 "warn: You locally have $tag_name but it does not (yet)"
echo >&2 "warn: appear to be at $url"
echo >&2 "warn: Do you want to push it there, perhaps?"
fi
git cat-file tag "$tag_name" |
sed -n -e '1,/^$/d' -e '/^-----BEGIN PGP /q' -e p
echo
fi &&
if test -n "$branch_name" || test -n "$tag_name"
then
echo "----------------------------------------------------------------"
fi &&
git shortlog ^$baserev $headrev &&
git diff -M --stat --summary $patch $merge_base..$headrev || status=1
if test -z "$ref"
then
echo "warn: No branch of $url is at:" >&2
git show -s --format='warn: %h: %s' $headrev >&2
echo "warn: Are you sure you pushed '$head' there?" >&2
status=1
fi
Improve request-pull to handle non-rebased branches This is actually a few different changes to request-pull, making it slightly smarter: 1) Minor cleanup of revision->base variable names, making it follow the head/headrev naming convention that is already in use. 2) Compute the merge-base between the two revisions upfront and reuse that selected merge-base to create the diffstat. 3) Refuse to generate a pull request for branches that have no existing relationship. These aren't very common and would mess up our diffstat generation. 4) Disable the PAGER when running shortlog and diff, as these would otherwise activate the pager for each command when git-request-pull is run on a tty. Instead users can get the entire output paged (if desired) using `git -p request-pull`. 5) Use shortlog rather than `git log | git shortlog` now that recent shortlog versions are able to run the revision listing internally. 6) Attempt to resolve the input URL using the user's configured remotes. This is useful if the URL you want the recipient to see is also the one you used to push your changes. If not a config-file remote could easily be setup for the public URL and request-pull could be passed that name instead. 7) Automatically guess and include the remote branch name in the body of the message. We list the branch name immediately after the URL, making it easy for the recipient to copy and paste the entire line onto a `git pull` command line. Rumor has it Linus likes this format, for exactly that reason. If multiple branches at the remote match $headrev we take the first one returned by peek-remote and assume it is suitable. If no branches are available we warn the user about the problem, but insert a static string that is not a valid branch name and would be obvious to anyone reading the message as being totally incorrect. This allows users to still generate a template message without network access (for example) and hand-correct the bits that cannot be verified. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-05-01 08:08:23 +02:00
exit $status