1
0

tex: extend frontend section

This commit is contained in:
surtur 2023-08-18 17:52:40 +02:00
parent 8795020ef2
commit cc511c602c
Signed by: wanderer
SSH Key Fingerprint: SHA256:MdCZyJ2sHLltrLBp0xQO0O1qTW9BT/xl5nXkDvhlMCI

@ -420,10 +420,11 @@ empirically allows for a rather quick UI prototyping. Tailwind was chosen
partially also because it \emph{looked} nice, had a reasonably detailed
documentation and offered built-in support for dark/light mode. The templates
containing the CSS classes need to be parsed by Tailwind in order to construct
its final stylesheet. Upstream provides the original CLI tool for that action
called \texttt{tailwindcss}. Overall, simple and accessible layouts had
preference over convoluted ones and data-backed effort was made to create
contrasting pages.
the final stylesheet. Upstream provides the original CLI tool called
\texttt{tailwindcss},which can be used exactly for that action. Overall, simple
and accessible layouts were preferred, a single page was rather split into
multiple when becoming convoluted, and data-backed efforts were made to create
reasonably contrasting pages.
\n{3}{Frontend experiments}
@ -432,7 +433,7 @@ project, but has ultimately scrapped the functionality in favour of the
entirely server-side rendered one. It is possible that it would get revisited
if the client-side dynamic functionality was necessary and performance
mattered. Even from the short experiments it was obvious how much faster
WebAssembly was compared to JavaScript.
WebAssembly was when compared to JavaScript.
\newpage