1
0

tex: rework conclusion

This commit is contained in:
leo 2023-05-26 07:53:23 +02:00
parent cd6431fe83
commit 18871cdcf6
Signed by: wanderer
SSH Key Fingerprint: SHA256:Dp8+iwKHSlrMEHzE3bJnPng70I7LEsa3IJXRH/U+idQ

@ -1727,39 +1727,46 @@ a testing instance; therefore, limits to prevent abuse might be imposed.
% =========================================================================== %
\nn{Conclusion}
This thesis opened by introducing common terminology and continued with a dive
into cryptography topics such as encryption, mentioned Diffie-Hellman key
distribution scheme and briefly mentioned TLS. Further, it discussed the inner
workings of browsers and the protocols that underpin them.
The objectives of the thesis have been to create the Password Compromise
Monitoring Tool aimed at security-conscious user in order to validate their
assumptions on the security of their credentials. The thesis opened by
introducing common terminology and continued with a dive into cryptography
topics such as encryption, Diffie-Hellman key distribution scheme and briefly
mentioned TLS. Furthermore, it discussed the inner workings of browsers and the
protocols that underpin them.
Additionally, security mechanisms such as Site Isolation and Content Security
Policy, that are commonly employed by mainstream browsers of today were
Policy, commonly employed by mainstream browsers of today, were
introduced and the reader learnt how Content Security Policy is easily and
dynamically configured.
The large part of the thesis then revolved around the practical part, described
everything from tooling used through application high-level-view architecture
to implementation of specific parts of the application across the stack.
An extensive body of the thesis then revolved around the practical part,
describing everything from tooling used through application high-level-view
architecture to implementation of specific parts of the application across the
stack.
Finally, the practical part concluded by extensively describing validation
methods used to verify the application worked correctly.
Finally, the practical part concluded by broadly depicting validation
methods used to verify if the application worked correctly.
Of course, there are things that the author wishes were done differently or
engineered better, but not everything could realistically be realised in the
limited timespan and scope that had to be imposed on the project to prevent
diverging. This constitutes clear candidates for future work that improves on
the existing state, for example accessibility-wise. Author's unfamiliarity with
the accessibility tooling sometimes compromising on the quality in this segment
of the application, but it is a known deficiency. Further, on the list of tasks
for the future also remained adding \emph{fuzzing} tests for the program,
producing Software Bill of Materials, utilising additional immutable database
or unifying the frontend design language across the pages.
The author would like to recognise that there are certain aspects of the thesis
in the need of further development. It is necessary to admit that not
everything could have realistically been realised in the limited timespan and
scope imposed on the project to prevent diverging. The concerns mentioned above
constitute clear candidates for future work of the author who intends to
improve on the existing state, for example accessibility-wise. The author's
unfamiliarity with the accessibility tooling sometimes compromised on the
quality in this segment of the application, but it is a known deficiency.
Furthermore, the list of tasks for the future may also contain adding
\emph{fuzzing} tests for the program, producing Software Bill of Materials,
utilising additional immutable database or unifying the frontend design
language across the pages.
The program does have a very solid core that for instance listens for OS
signals, handles graceful shutdown and supports structured logging but still
has room for improvements, despite the fact that its creation really was
best-effort. Due to the list of things mentioned earlier, it cannot really be
called a \emph{finished} project yet, but it can already serve a purpose.
has room for improvements, despite the fact that its creation has been
best-effort. Due to a number of reasons mentioned earlier, it should not be
called an utterly \emph{finished} project yet, but it can already serve a clear
purpose.
% =========================================================================== %