doc: Explain more reasons for commit revocation.
* doc/contributing.texi (Commit Revocation): Expound.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d475134245
commit
d3d6d1c6eb
@ -1466,6 +1466,27 @@ key removed from @file{.guix-authorizations} after 12 months of
|
||||
inactivity; they can ask to regain commit access by emailing the
|
||||
maintainers, without going through the vouching process.
|
||||
|
||||
Maintainers@footnote{See @uref{https://guix.gnu.org/en/about} for the
|
||||
current list of maintainers. You can email them privately at
|
||||
@email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org}.} may also revoke an individual's
|
||||
commit rights, as a last resort, if cooperation with the rest of the
|
||||
community has caused too much friction---even within the bounds of the
|
||||
project's code of conduct (@pxref{Contributing}). They would only do so
|
||||
after public or private discussion with the individual and a clear
|
||||
notice. Examples of behavior that hinders cooperation and could lead to
|
||||
such a decision include:
|
||||
|
||||
@itemize
|
||||
@item repeated violation of the commit policy stated above;
|
||||
@item repeated failure to take peer criticism into account;
|
||||
@item breaching trust through a series of grave incidents.
|
||||
@end itemize
|
||||
|
||||
When maintainers resort to such a decision, they notify developers on
|
||||
@email{guix-devel@@gnu.org}; inquiries may be sent to
|
||||
@email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org}. Depending on the situation, the
|
||||
individual may still be welcome to contribute.
|
||||
|
||||
@subsection Helping Out
|
||||
|
||||
One last thing: the project keeps moving forward because committers not
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user